• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The concept of God is incoherent. Discuss

Extracts from this document...


"The concept of God is incoherent. Discuss" God is conceived of as a (supernatural) being that is eternal, omnipresent, omnipotent, omniscient, all good, all just and all merciful. These attributions appear to create logical difficulties, sometimes singly, sometimes when taken together, though it is in some cases necessary to add facts about the world (such as the existence of evil) to create the incoherence. In such cases, it is the whole picture of the nature of God plus aspects of reality that is held to be incoherence. Firstly God is Omnipotence. Omnipotence by definition means that God is all powerful. If God were all powerful, he would be able to do anything, which would include any act which he can overcome with his own power. ...read more.


In such a proposition, no act has really been described. Omnipotence does create problems in other areas. In addition another problematic attribute of God is his omniscience. Omniscience means all knowing. The claim is that if God is all knowing. However this creates a problem, if God knows everything then surely that must indicted that we as human do not have 'free will.' For example suppose I am going to be going on holiday in March God would know that this was going to happen. (God's foreknowledge) In some way God had already planned what would happen next. Therefore it hardly seems to be 'my' act. However on the other hand if I was to commit a bad act that I am planning to carry out surely in this case we can apply the same method as the first illustration. ...read more.


However, I think the theist can give a plausible answer to this particular accusation of Incoherence. If I am free, my doing a particular action X makes it the case that God knows that I have done it, so that the causal relation runs the opposite way from that claimed in the objection. This does not imply that I can make it the case that God knew it before the time when I did X, and therefore that I can affect the past. For God is usually thought of as existing outside of time. (It is perhaps only in this sense that he can correctly be described as 'eternal'-he never begins or ceases to exist.) Of course, it must be God's decision to give us freedom to perform one act rather than another. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. The concept of disembodied existence is coherent - Discuss

    To argue the case for materialism, we can make a distinction between two separate worlds. The physical world is populated by material objects and is accessible by observation to everybody. In contrast, the mental world is populated by thoughts which are inaccessible to other people and seem to inhabit a universe of their own.

  2. We do not possess any genuine freedom to act ethically Discuss

    recognises that there are external factors which can affect our moral decisions and ability to live ethically.

  1. Conscience is the voice of God - discuss

    Also, in Aquinas' view, any act can be morally justified only if 'informed' by the Church. If the Christian teachings accurately portray the voice of God, then your conscience becomes, by default, the voice of God. If however the Church is wrong, then your conscience is not the voice of God.

  2. To what extent is the omnipotence of God a logically coherent concept?

    that God ought to be able to do what is logically impossible? Aquinas argued that logical impossible actions, such as 2+2 = 5, are not actions at all. They are not ?proper things? that one can or cannot do. Also there are theological problems with God?s omnipotence being a logically

  1. To what extent is the omnipotence of God a logically coherent concept

    By this Descartes means that for us humans it is impossible to imagine and understand a notion as illogical as a square circle, however God created everything, including logic. Thus for Descartes it is coherent for God to be able to do such things.

  2. The Concept of Life After Death is Incoherent - Discuss.

    Buddhism also teaches a different meaning of karma; they interpret it as the process of working through the effects of ethically significant past actions. These actions are not however passed on to the next life although they do influence it. The other main concept of life after death is resurrection.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work