• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

We have consented to be governed so we are obliged to obey the government Discuss this statement.

Extracts from this document...


"We have consented to be governed so we are obliged to obey the government" The question is related to the matter of political obligation and the social contract we belong in under the government. I feel that we are obliged to obey the government because we have all been educated, all been helped by a governmental service (police, fire brigade, health service) and some of us choose to vote which I feel automatically means we should live under their control for our own good. We, at the moment, live under a social contract. The only other options would to let some people live under the governmental control or have a complete Anarchist country. I think that we should feel obliged to obey the government because we live in a predominately democratic world and after thousands of years of civilisation it has become the most successful way of living. If we did not obey the government then all control would be lost and towns and cities would be overturned. ...read more.


This reason may be criticised because if a small amount of the population live under their own rule then this will undoubtedly have an effect on the rest of the country because people that call themselves 'anarchists' could steal and murder and get away with it because the government have no real control over them. This would cause massive uproar because of the drastic change included. The change would allow people to rebel properly for the first time without any consequences. An example of a scaled-down version of this would be the London riots that happened earlier in the year. As soon as people started to get a feeling of that freedom then everything became out of control. I feel that this would happen but in a larger scale. This argument still stands because there would be no realistic way of allowing any Anarchism into our country without drastic consequences. For this reason alone, I still think that we should all be governed and everyone should feel obliged to obey the law and government otherwise havoc would occur. ...read more.


For this reason, an explicit view on this matter would not work and the argument still stands. After summarising the possible arguments, I feel that living in a 100% anarchist country could not work because of the situation we are in now and the change and consequences would be too great to handle. On the other hand, living in an explicit country where people could choose if they wanted to be governed would also not work in my opinion because of more specific problems such as major problems in day to day society and the problem that our country would undoubtedly split into two separate countries, one being the Anarchists and the other; people who wanted to be ruled. To conclude, we have consented to be governed because we live on governmental land and we follow governmental laws and should therefore feel the consequences if we break these laws. Consequently, people who believe that they are above the government should either leave the country completely or feel the consequences otherwise there would be no control and therefore no society or community. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Science Solves All The Problems About Where We Come From Discuss

    time in creation: "even animals that have since become extinct - such as dinosaurs - were made on the fifth and sixth days of the creation week". Morris feels that science cannot possibly have solutions to the origins of humanity as the answers to everything that we can ever question

  2. Social Contract

    giving a justification for us to be moral (as well as the existence of societies). However, there seems to remain one problem. By saying that societies develop morality and that there is no morality independent of this, it leaves us with the problem of cultural relativism.

  1. Can computers think?

    He even goes so far as to say that even if you would "Imagine a robot with a brain-shaped computer lodged in its cranial cavity, imagine the computer programmed with all the synapses of a human brain, imagine the whole behavior of the robot is indistinguishable from human behavior, and

  2. A Small Excerpt From My Autobiography

    structural and materialistic things around me must have seemed an insignificant notion to have. I could not think about, let alone analyse, anything beyond my own tormented feelings of sheer pain, anguish, neglect, betrayal and above all anger. Yes anger!

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work