• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Religious Experience presents a convincing argument for the existence of God. Analyse this claim.

Extracts from this document...


"Religious Experience presents a convincing argument for the existence of God." Analyse this claim. The argument from religious experience is an a posteriori, inductive argument for the existence of God. A religious experience is an encounter with the divine, and for believers, this makes religious experience the most convincing proof of God's existence. According to Saint Therese of Avila, "God establishes himself in the interior of this soul in such a way, that when I return to myself, it is wholly impossible for me to doubt that I have been in God and God in me." The question is: How does one move from the conviction that a person has experienced God to the claim that he or she actually did experience God? I will argue that although the argument from religious experience demonstrates a likely probability that God exists, the evidence is not enough for it to be a proof. Scholars have defined religious experience in many ways. Ninian Smart, in The Religious Experience of Mankind, said that "A religious experience involves some kind of 'perception' of the invisible world, or a perception that some visible person or thing is a manifestation of the invisible world." Martin Buber argues that God reveals himself to people on a personal level as they experience him through life and in the world. He wrote, in I and Thou, that everyday human relationships are of a simple level, which he calls "I-it". ...read more.


Although, there are considerable, convincing problems with this type of argument. First of all, an experience of God does not always indicate the reality of God. Our regular experiences can easily be mistaken, for example you are walking down the street when you see your friend on the other side of the road, you call out their name but when they don't turn around you realise that it is just a person who looks like them. And since regular experiences are easily mistaken, is it not fair to say that an experience of the divine must be even more ambiguous. Because the argument itself is inductive, meaning that is dealing only in probabilities. The conclusion cannot be sustained simply on the basis of the claims made in the premises. Richard Swinburne argues inductively in favor of the argument from religious experience. He states that it is reasonable to believe that God is loving and personal and would seek to reveal himself: "An omnipotent and perfectly good creator will seek to interact with his creatures and in particular, human persons capable of knowing him". Swinburne attempts to solve the problem of moving from the conviction that a person has experienced God to the claim that he or she actually did experience God, or "bridge the internal/external gap", with The Cumulative Argument for the existence of God. This argument is based on the view that if one takes all the different arguments for the existence of God, then they are more convincing than one argument alone. ...read more.


In particular, the issue with the consistency of religious experiences is a strong deciding factor when considering the existence of God. There are thousands of testimonies of religious experience, with God as the source of them all. It is undeniable that there are common themes to religious experience, but surely there would be a greater similarity between them all? Anthony Flew puts forward a strong argument, claiming that the character of religious experience "seems to depend on the interests, background and expectations of those who have them rather than anything separate or autonomous". He implies that it is strangely convenient that a vision of the Virgin Mary would occur not to a "Hindu at Bewares" but to a "Roman Catholic of Lourdes". Flew clearly puts forward an argument more credible than that used by Caroline Franks Davies in an attempt to justify it. She rejects his challenge on the basis that it applies largely to visions and also claims that people will tend to use the language and ideas of their beliefs in order to describe their experiences. Ultimately, the argument from religious experience fails to provide a definite proof of God's existence. The argument relies on the authenticity of such experiences, and while they may be convincing for those who have had them, we cannot be sure unless we experience it ourselves. Caroline Franks Davies suggests that we take all the arguments in favor of God's existence and when we add in religious experience, the scales have tipped in its favor. However, a collection of bad arguments do not equal a good one. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Compare and contrast arguments for and against belief in life after death.

    However there are a number of explanations for the phenomenon including hoaxes or elaborate tricks, which could convince people they had seen a ghost whereas in actuality they had not. Secondly there is the 'stone tape' theory which suggests that just as a magnetic tape is able to record events

  2. Moot-court Reflective Report.

    I prepared my whole speech well in advance, so I would have time to familiarise myself with my speech, so I would not just have to read it out when I had to perform it, so I would be able to make eye contact with the judge.

  1. Religious experience presents a convincing argument to prove the existence of God. Analyse this ...

    The principle of testimony, also set out by Swinburne, also supports this argument as in the absence of special consideration, it is reasonable to believe that the experience of others are probably as they report the. This means that we should believe what people tell us unless we have good reason not to.

  2. Compare and contrast the contributions of Descartes and Humes on the issue of the ...

    than Descartes because it attempts to prove it is poosible to conceive God as not conceiving. His 2nd form came about as a reply to the objection that it is self-contradictory to conceive of something which nothing greater can be thought yet to deny that that something exists.

  1. In what ways may suffering create philosophical problems for religious believers? Outline two solutions ...

    However, there is a huge amount of criticism in Augustine's argument, with Schleiermacher arguing that there is a contradiction in the argument, as that a perfectly created world, designed by god, has gone wrong, and if the world were perfect, which is what Augustine argued, it would mean that evil created itself out of nothing.

  2. Analyse the key strengths for the arguments of the existence of God based on ...

    However, although there may seem to be similarities, if all the experiences are that of God surely they would be more similar, for example why don't Hindus see the Virgin Mary? The argument from quantity is also known as the cumulative argument whereby there are simply too many experiences recorded

  1. Assess whether religious experience demonstrates the existence of God?

    David Hume and A.J. Ayer are well known empiricists. They would argue that unless something empirically verified it should not be deemed meaningful so if I was to see God that should be seen as meaningful as it is empirically verified. If I were to see a cat walking across a street I would

  2. Philosophers have proved conclusively that religious language is meaningful. Discuss

    ground, religious language isn?t univocal and therefore the meaning may be unclear, religious language is equivocal language because it is talking about the realm of infinite existence, the result is different interpretations and understandings of the words used. A J Ayer was a logical positivist, he believed that empirical methods

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work