• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Religious Experience presents a convincing argument for the existence of God. Analyse this claim.

Extracts from this document...


"Religious Experience presents a convincing argument for the existence of God." Analyse this claim. The argument from religious experience is an a posteriori, inductive argument for the existence of God. A religious experience is an encounter with the divine, and for believers, this makes religious experience the most convincing proof of God's existence. According to Saint Therese of Avila, "God establishes himself in the interior of this soul in such a way, that when I return to myself, it is wholly impossible for me to doubt that I have been in God and God in me." The question is: How does one move from the conviction that a person has experienced God to the claim that he or she actually did experience God? I will argue that although the argument from religious experience demonstrates a likely probability that God exists, the evidence is not enough for it to be a proof. Scholars have defined religious experience in many ways. Ninian Smart, in The Religious Experience of Mankind, said that "A religious experience involves some kind of 'perception' of the invisible world, or a perception that some visible person or thing is a manifestation of the invisible world." Martin Buber argues that God reveals himself to people on a personal level as they experience him through life and in the world. He wrote, in I and Thou, that everyday human relationships are of a simple level, which he calls "I-it". ...read more.


Although, there are considerable, convincing problems with this type of argument. First of all, an experience of God does not always indicate the reality of God. Our regular experiences can easily be mistaken, for example you are walking down the street when you see your friend on the other side of the road, you call out their name but when they don't turn around you realise that it is just a person who looks like them. And since regular experiences are easily mistaken, is it not fair to say that an experience of the divine must be even more ambiguous. Because the argument itself is inductive, meaning that is dealing only in probabilities. The conclusion cannot be sustained simply on the basis of the claims made in the premises. Richard Swinburne argues inductively in favor of the argument from religious experience. He states that it is reasonable to believe that God is loving and personal and would seek to reveal himself: "An omnipotent and perfectly good creator will seek to interact with his creatures and in particular, human persons capable of knowing him". Swinburne attempts to solve the problem of moving from the conviction that a person has experienced God to the claim that he or she actually did experience God, or "bridge the internal/external gap", with The Cumulative Argument for the existence of God. This argument is based on the view that if one takes all the different arguments for the existence of God, then they are more convincing than one argument alone. ...read more.


In particular, the issue with the consistency of religious experiences is a strong deciding factor when considering the existence of God. There are thousands of testimonies of religious experience, with God as the source of them all. It is undeniable that there are common themes to religious experience, but surely there would be a greater similarity between them all? Anthony Flew puts forward a strong argument, claiming that the character of religious experience "seems to depend on the interests, background and expectations of those who have them rather than anything separate or autonomous". He implies that it is strangely convenient that a vision of the Virgin Mary would occur not to a "Hindu at Bewares" but to a "Roman Catholic of Lourdes". Flew clearly puts forward an argument more credible than that used by Caroline Franks Davies in an attempt to justify it. She rejects his challenge on the basis that it applies largely to visions and also claims that people will tend to use the language and ideas of their beliefs in order to describe their experiences. Ultimately, the argument from religious experience fails to provide a definite proof of God's existence. The argument relies on the authenticity of such experiences, and while they may be convincing for those who have had them, we cannot be sure unless we experience it ourselves. Caroline Franks Davies suggests that we take all the arguments in favor of God's existence and when we add in religious experience, the scales have tipped in its favor. However, a collection of bad arguments do not equal a good one. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. In what ways may suffering create philosophical problems for religious believers? Outline two solutions ...

    This could only have come from God. In both cases here, Schleiermacher is pointing out internal contradictions in Augustine`s theodicy. Both result in him arguing that evil originated with God. In addition, Schleiermacher`s observations are given support by looking at the concept of Hell in Augustine`s theodicy.

  2. Religious Experience - Edexel A2

    Anthony Flew is also well-known for his objection to religious experiences, the vicious circle. Whilst perhaps the most relevant objections for long-term corporate experiences, the vicious circle challenge is one which questions the nature of the experience itself. As Flew says, the nature of religious experiences "seems to depend on

  1. Examine the argument from religious experience for the existence of God. To what extent ...

    The first of these is Ineffability; which is a state of experience that is difficult to describe as it is unlike any other. The second being Noetic Quality; which is said to be where the experience reveals insights that are beyond the scope of normal human reason.

  2. Analyse the key strengths for the arguments of the existence of God based on ...

    emotions eg happiness, fear and wonder all directed at the divine resulting in a feeling of joyful desire to belong to God. How else would these be feelings similar if they were not all similar experiences that were the work of God?

  1. Evaluate the claim that corporate religious experience is no more than an illusion

    When he visited the Toronto Airport Church, ?the Blessing? seemed to be passed onto this church and has remained there since. Common effects of ?the Blessing? working on a person are falling backwards (sometimes gently, other times violently, with those falling having a tendency to lose consciousness), uncontrollable laughter (referred

  2. Does Religious Experience offer a convincing argument for God

    This experience also offering a convincing argument for the existence of God as people may believe that these messages of wounds were personal messages from God to let people know he exists and that he is doing it for a specific reason.

  1. Philosophers have proved conclusively that religious language is meaningful. Discuss

    Logical positivists regarded religious language as meaningless because it is used to consider things beyond human experience and this leads to problems in understanding the meaning of assertions being made, the problems arise because of four reasons: any discussion that relates to God and belief can?t be based on common

  2. Critically assess with reference to William James the arguments from religious experience.

    If this is the case, there is still no objective way to differentiate between religious experiences, drug induced visions and hallucinations and James? argument is further weakened. In addition many people claim that the common core of religious experiences do reveal a consistent picture of God, for example, visions and voices reveal a God who communicates with his people.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work