• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'A belief in the life after death solves the problem of evil' Discuss

Extracts from this document...


'A belief in the life after death solves the problem of evil' Discuss The word evil has a broad definition. There are two main types of evil; Moral evil and Natural evil. Moral evil covers the willful acts of human beings such as murder and rape. Natural evil refers to natural disasters such as famines and floods. We can divide these two types further into another two types of evil; Physical evil and metaphysical evil. Physical evil means bodily pain or mental anguish for example fear, illness, grief and war. Metaphysical evil refers to such things as imperfection and chance for instance criminals going unpunished and deformities. But how does this problem get solved by a belief in the life after death. The problem of evil comes about because of certain qualities that religious people believe God to have. A religious believer would not want to deny God of being Omni benevolent, omnipotent and omniscient. To say that there is evil in the world is to doubt that God is Omni benevolent; omnipotent and omniscient as God create the world. Irenaeus proposed that God did not create a perfect world. He chose not to create a perfect world because he knew we had to choose to do good in order to become a flawless human being. ...read more.


When we die a replica body will be created and our personality would be transferred to that body. The replica would have memories of dying. The only difference would be that the replica would have new experiences of what will happen. We will have memory and psychological continuation, not physical continuation. For this to happen there must be a minimum of two worlds. The universal conscious God sees both. I only see one, the one I am in. There could be more than two worlds. John Hick also goes onto say that we are all recreated in heaven and hell. If we are good we will go to heaven and if we are bad then we will go to hell. John Hick shares a similar view to the Christian View. Christians believe that there is a heaven and hell. When we die Christians believe that there will be a judgment. In this, everyone's life will be evaluated. We will either go to heaven or hell. Hell, in Christian beliefs is a place in which the soul suffers the consequences of sin. Hell is defined as the place or state of punishment. Christianity views hell as a place of eternal torment. Hell is for those who have been bad in this life. Heaven is the opposite of hell. ...read more.


You will learn from you mistakes and will try achieving goodness in the next life. For Irenaeus, us, ourselves will eventual solve the problem of evil, therefore a life after death will not solve the problem of evil. We just live in an imperfect world that we will have to work towards making a perfect world. A belief in the life after death can solve the problem of evil in some ways because people who believe in a life after death will know that they will have been good in this life in order to be rewarded in the next life. The better they are in this life the better the reward. This therefore means that the person will have to commit little evil in order to get the rewards. This will consequently mean that evil will be reduced. Also Christianity will solve the problem of evil because Christians believe in heaven and hell. If you are good in this life you will have a good after life. If you are bad in this life you will be punished and sent to hell in the after life. The idea of heaven and hell also solves the problem of evil for John Hick as he also believes that you are recreated in heaven and hell. Richard Dawkins said that there is no God and therefore there is no problem. This is the world. We should help the world and create a stronger world. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. The Goodness of God

    The main argument for the non-acceptance of a perfect God, or even any God at all is the existence of evil in the world. There are of course two types of evil; moral or human evil and natural evil. Epicurus raised the point "Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?

  2. Compare and contrast arguments for and against belief in life after death.

    Therefore a human will have a human soul. Aristotle defines the body and soul as being inseparable. The soul develops the person's skills, character or temper, but it cannot survive death. When the body dies, the soul ceases to exist, as they are one. This would appear to be materialistic at first but Aristotle believed that the body and soul were different.

  1. An embodied life in heaven is entirely possible. Discuss.

    The Bible conveys that when Jesus returns to earth, he will physically raise all those who have died, giving them back the bodies they lost at death. These will be the same bodies people had in earthly life, but the resurrected bodies cannot die, and the virtuous will be transformed into a glorified state, freed from suffering and pain.

  2. problem of evil

    The conclusions drawn from this are that either God is not omnipotent and cannot stop evil from existing, or that God is not all-loving and chooses not to stop evil existing, or that in fact God does not exist. This can be used as an argument for the non-existence of God.

  1. Problem of evil

    Thus we are left to conclude that God's existence is not compromised by God. However, we must ask whether this view holds up to second version of the problem. The second problem is the Evidential Problem of Evil (advocated by Rowe, Darwin and Hume)

  2. Introduction to Philosophy.

    Criticized the trail of Socrates as he tried o teach not like the Sophists, but by means of reason. He was a true wise man and this is what led him to his death. > The ideal truth for Plato was: The universal as it is the essence so it is superior to the particular reality/ truth.

  1. The Concept of Life After Death is Incoherent - Discuss.

    The next major problem that we may encounter whilst arguing for life after death is what exactly happens after death? if our disembodied soul arrives in the after life there is no way that we know where or what that is, this only means that there is no firm evidence for anyone to give on life after death.

  2. Conscience is innate. Discuss

    following the good and avoiding the bad. The conscienta is the choice to follow an action based upon the principles and right reasoning of the synderesis. Both of parts of Aquina?s conscience enable us to decide between good and evil and then use ?right reason? to follow the good action and make a moral decision.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work