• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A coherent account of Plato's concept of the body/soul distinction.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Scott Bissett L6Du A] Give a coherent account of Plato's concept of the body/soul distinction. B] Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of Plato's Dualism. A: Plato believed that humans could be broken down into 3 parts: the body, the mind and the soul. The body is the physical part of the body that is only concerned with the material world, and through which we are able to experience the world we live in. it wants to experience self-gratification. It is mortal, and when it dies, it is truly dead. The mind is directed towards the heavenly realm of Ideas, and is immortal. It is with our minds that we are able to understand the eternal world of the Forms. ...read more.

Middle

B: Plato's dualism was a combination of the key ideas from both Materialism and Idealism. His theory that we had both a physical body, and a soul/mind and that the soul/mind is a thinking being, complete in itself, and capable of living without the body. A strength of Plato's Dualism is that it says there is more to living than just what we are always aware of, as just because the physical world seems hard, there are other ways of living. Another strength is that he doesn't deny the existence of the physical world as an idealist might, but just says that the physical world isn't as importance, that we should be seeking to understand the world of Forms. ...read more.

Conclusion

Modern neuroscience can show the dependence of the mind on the soul empirically, which Plato's theory of a simple immortal soul cannot be verified. If, as Plato claims, the mind is a non-material body that cannot affect the body, then there is no explanation for why footballers chase after a ball. The body has no reason to do this, except that it is told to do so by the mind. The body is not entirely dependant on the mind, as after death the body can continue to work for a few seconds, until the muscles etc stop receiving electrical impulses. Plato says that a person's mind is what creates their identity, however people recognise each other by their body, not by their mind. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Theories of the resurrection of the body are logically coherent.

    4 star(s)

    These are dilemmas to which we simply do not have the scientific knowledge with which to answer them yet, however, this does not make the idea of bodily resurrection illogical, or even, improbable. I believe that this version of the replica theory is much simpler and, thus, much more effective than Hick's own.

  2. Explain Plato's and Aristotle's ideas of form, body, knowledge and soul.

    From looking at the information I have written about Plato and Aristotle's beliefs on the theory of forms, body, soul and knowledge we can see that both their ideas differ. Aristotle had many criticisms of Plato's theory of forms. He argued that, pushed to its logical conclusion, Plato's theory of forms appears slightly ridiculous.

  1. Body soul destinction

    This is a way of preserving personal identity after death. The evidence for religious materialism is based on the resurrection of Jesus. Some accounts during the new testament describe Jesus after the resurrection and was recognised by followers before ascension.

  2. Theories of Resurrection of the body are logically coherent - Discuss

    Another approach to resurrection is that taken by John Hick; he wrote how bodily resurrection is 'logical' in his book 'Death and Eternal Life'. Hick is a materialist who believes that the soul and body are 'psycho-physically' unified, and interprets Paul's referencing of 'spiritual resurrection' to believe in a bodily resurrection after death.

  1. Plato & The Soul

    of sleep to a state of being awake, one can do the opposite. Plato argued that if this were the case, then the same should apply to life and death.

  2. The concept of disembodied existence is coherent - Discuss

    This challenge has been met in an interesting article by H. H. Price (Price 1953). Price spells out, in considerable detail, a notion of disembodied souls existing in a "world" of something like dream-images - images, however, that would be shared between a number of more or less like-minded, and telepathically interacting, souls.

  1. The Concept of Life After Death is Incoherent - Discuss.

    Does it contain any experimental reasoning, concerning matter of fact or existence? No. Commit it to the flames: for it can contain nothing but sophistry and illusion. - Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. There is obviously no internal logic in such an argument about life after death and

  2. Give an account of the teachings of materialism and dualism with regard to life ...

    To quote Philip Pecorino, ?There have been numerous examples of people who have had their basic behaviour change as a result of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work