• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

I might believe that an action is morally right, but this does not give me a motive to perform it. Discuss. (30)

Extracts from this document...


'I might believe that an action is morally right, but this does not give me a motive to perform it.' Discuss. (30) Psychological egoism claims that human nature is such that we cannot help but pursue our self-interest, we are biologically and psychologically disposed to behave in this way. It is a fact that we automatically act to promote our own interest and we cannot do otherwise. This theory highlights a strength of egoism as a whole, and it also explains ethical motivation. I act morally because it benefits me, and furthers my own life. It places human actions firmly and consistently within the natural world: like all plants and creatures, we seek or own good. This is a convincing answer to the question - 'why be moral?', and this theory also agreements with the statement expressed in the question. Psychological egoism claims that even if something is morally right, we have no motive to perform it unless it benefits us and furthers our own life. However, it could be argued that being moral simply requires us to conform with moral rules or be a 'virtuous character' - and there is nothing to specifically say that following moral rules or being virtuous will not be of benefit for us. An example could be used is the moral rule that it is wrong for us to steal - a psychological egoist may ...read more.


They believe this because virtue ethics claims that our main aim in life is to be truly happy, but we will only be able to do this if we are completely balanced. Our true happiness comes with the conviction that by being moral we will achieve a flouring and fulfilling life, as well as the knowledge that we are contributing to a flourishing community. They believe we are happier around positive and supportive people but an egoist would not be able to do this. For Aristotle, there is an aim (or telos in Greek) for everything that we do. Like by me writing this essay, my telos is that you will gain a clear understanding of whether something being moral gives you a motive to perform it. According to Aristotle, we have two types of aims: superior aims and subordinate aims. An illustration that could be used is that attending my lessons at college (which is my subordinate aim) will get me good A-level results and those results will help me to get into the university of my choice which will help me to be happy, and for Aristotle everyone's final, superior aim is happiness. However the word we should use for happiness in Aristotle's theory is eudaimonia, which could be described as 'living well' or 'flourishing', not just for yourself but for society. ...read more.


Egoism provides a better theory as to explaining why we are motivated to do things. Although virtue ethics provides a better explanation as to why the soldier may give up his life for others, it seems more plausible that we do things to benefit ourselves as opposed to others in most other situations. It cannot be denied that at that specific moment, the soldier was put in to a position where he could not think properly about the situation and the implications it may have - although technically he could have been being 'virtuous' or 'altruistic', in another way you could say he was not being altruistic at all as his family and friends back home would be affected negatively by the decision he made. It appears that a large majority of people would not act morally just because it is the right thing to do, when put in the situation that the soldier was put in it is most likely that a majority of people who still had something to live for (e.g. family, wealth etc.) would allow somebody else to give up their life rather than them giving up theirs. As stated earlier, egoism provides a better theory as to explaining why we are motivated to do things) - it is human nature that we will do things to benefit ourselves and allow ourselves to carry on living. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Outline the main features of virtue ethic

    any list of virtues will be relative to the culture in which it is being drawn up, and as everybody will have a different perception to what their virtues would be and how to act in different religions and cultures is totally different so no one could exactly agree on one list of virtues that would be set in stone.

  2. How might we combat the Gettier Problem? In giving your answer set forth two ...

    However that knowledge is false. Because the key he has will still open that lock, however that lock is no longer in his door and therefore he is wrong to believe that key will open the door to his home.

  1. What are the principles of natural law? Every adult has the right to become ...

    The motive must coincide with the cardinal virtues and to lack any of them is to lack the ability to make a moral judgement. So, for an act to be moral it must be the right kind of action, in the right circumstance, involving the right people and with the right intention.

  2. 'It pays to be moral.' Discuss. (30)

    Ethical egoism is the doctrine that all persons should act from their own self-interest, which suggests a life of extreme selfishness but this is not so - it does not necessarily mean a life of short-term pleasure although it might.

  1. Evaluate plato and aristotle on well being

    One of the most crucial points Aristotle makes is that although virtue is necessary for 'well-being' it is in fact not sufficient. In order to be truly happy one must have three things. 1. A good character. 2. One must be active in living virtuously 3.

  2. Sartre is a very strong proponent of strong determinism, that is, he does not ...

    If the universe is in a way created by man, then that same universe must follow laws created by man as well. The first premise of the determinist argument comes apart if this view is accepted. The second, and perhaps more important of the purposes, is to combat skepticism.

  1. Leaving home - a corrected essay.

    If one cannot come up with a reasoned answer as to why he or she should obey, then there is no place for obligation to exist. (this is good to put in ur intro to describe the meaning of obligation in the eyes of the author...if not, put it in

  2. Is active citizenship necessary to the achievement of eudaimonia?

    This is permitted through the accomplishment of self-sufficiency by the state, something that neither family nor village units could fully provide. Thus if we take Aristotle's famous assertion that 'man is by nature a political animal' and that the goal of the state, itself a natural institution, is the achievement

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work