• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A) Explain what Aristotle meant by the final cause.

Extracts from this document...


Aristotle A Grade Essay A) Explain what Aristotle meant by the final cause. 25 Marks Aristotle was an empiricist. His epistemology was based on experience rather than rational thinking, as opposed to Plato who was a rationalist. Aristotle understood that the world around us is transient and after studying and exploring he concluded everything could be explained with 4 causes with the final cause being the most important. Aristotle believes that in order for us to understand the world we need to know what things are made of, look like, come from and most importantly its purpose. The material cause is the matter , so a table's material cause is wood and metal, The next cause is the formal cause, this is the way in which it is expressed; its characteristics. So a table's formal cause would be a flat top and four legs. The efficient cause is the agent that brought it about. So the efficient cause of a table would be the carpenter. ...read more.


Aristotle acknowledged that all things in our universe are always trying to achieve perfection, which is reflected by everything always having potentiality. This then led to think that everything in the universe forever desires perfection and we are drawn to a prime mover. Aristotle believed that the prime mover was the ultimate final cause, as it is perfect and we all are drawn to it, by always having potentiality, and always aspiring to perfection. The prime mover is pure actuality and has no potentiality. It exists necessarily and is transcendent. Aristotle emphasises the importance of the final cause because this links with idea of the prime mover and explains how it is the cause of movement for everything in the universe. Everything is always changing and part of the telos/final cause of all things is to seek perfection. The final cause is the main cause out of the four as it shows us a things purpose and reason for existing. The concept has been very influential on Christianity because of its implications of cause and purpose and how Christians see a purpose in life. ...read more.


He single most damaging criticism of Aristotle's ideas is from Plato. Plato says that empirical knowledge is useless to us because our sense data cannot be trusted and is easily manipulated. If you base your ideas on the physical world then you are not a true philosopher and cannot truly understand concepts like goodness, or understand the true purpose of things. The whole idea that the universe has a purpose is flawed according to Russell and Dawkins, who believe that the universe is random. However Aristotle's prime mover does at least attempt to explain why the universe exists as it does, rather than saying the is no reason at all. Aristotle would argue that without a telos there would be no point in things existing. Why would an acorn exist if it didn't have the purpose of growing into an oak tree? It is this idea that it cannot be explained why things exists at all without referring to their purpose that I believe the statement to be incorrect. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Plato versus Aristotle on well being

    actions is misunderstood and crucified for being unjust and his reputation soiled. Is Plato saying even in this case it is still better to be the just man? Plato explicitly maintains that yes it is, and uses this example to show that if it is the most beneficial and right

  2. Explain what Plato meant by the Form of the Good?

    This all leads to Plato's inevitable rejection of empiricism. He thought that propositions derived from sensory experience have, at most, a degree of probability; they are not certain. Pure knowledge may only be derived from certain, permanent facts. The argument is really that not only do the things we perceive

  1. Utopia - The Impossibility of Perfection

    "So long as private property remains, there is no hope at all of effecting a cure and restoring society to good health" (More, 29) Utopia has no currency, no use for precious metals or luxury of any sort, and most importantly abolishes private ownership.

  2. Discuss the usefulness of studying philiosophy.

    Mathematics has often been referred to as "the language of science5", while history can be used to closely trace the development of literature over time. The key reason as to why Philosophy contains such tremendous flexibility is because of its very nature.

  1. Evaluate plato and aristotle on well being

    things are not in the right balance then it becomes a matter of damaging your mental health. Plato believes that justice is gratifying in itself not merely because of its consequences. The purpose of human life is to live virtuously.

  2. The Final Cause - Aristotle was a philosopher; he worked with Plato and ...

    The final cause helps to distinguish what something is, it's identity, in the same way that Plato suggests the ideal form of a 'thing' tells you what it is. None of the other causes would exist if it weren't for the final cause.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work