• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The evangelist included the signs in order to make people believe. Assess this claim. (20 marks)

Extracts from this document...


'The evangelist included the signs in order to make people believe.' Assess this claim. (20 marks) There is much speculation from scholars as to why John chose to include the signs, which are unique to the fourth gospel. Broadly speaking, there are two main views. The first is that the signs were intended purely to be accurate accounts of Jesus' miracles, featuring historically and topographically factual details. The second, and perhaps more widely held, is that John had an evangelistic purpose in mind when he wrote the signs: he wanted to make his readers believe. John chooses to use the word 'semeia', meaning 'signs', rather than the 'dunameis' ('mighty act', used in the synoptics) to denote the miracles that Jesus performs. Whereas 'act' is a word firmly rooted in a particular place and timeframe, the word 'sign' evokes the idea of the miracles pointing to something else, or foretelling a future event. ...read more.


For example, neither the third or fourth sign ends with true faith from those involved. In the third sign, the Healing at the Pool, the crippled man does not embrace Christ's teachings but instead goes straight to the Jewish authorities, and even tries to shift blame onto Jesus for disregarding the rules of the Sabbath. At the end of the fourth sign, the Feeding of the 5,000, the crowd tries to make Jesus king by force. They do not understand that, as Sanders and Mastin put it, 'Jesus was a king, but...his kinship was not of this world'. Both signs three and four end in the same way: with Jesus quietly leaving the scene, because he has failed to inspire people to faith as he had hoped. Although these signs do result in negative outcomes, they are quite possibly a tool John has deliberately employed to help his readers understand the nature of faith. ...read more.


For example, Marsh suggests that the 38 years could be a deliberate parallel to the 40 days that Moses spent wandering the desert. This parallel might be intended as a subtle message to the reader that Christ has fulfilled Judaism, making it good, just as Jesus makes the crippled man better in the sign. The details that John includes in the signs may also be a way of validating them and convincing the reader that Jesus' miracles did take place. It seems that the title claim is justified, and that John's main purpose for the signs was in fact to make his readers believe. Not only is it explicitly stated in John 20:31, but there is evidence for it throughout the signs. Whilst it appears at first that the gospel being a theological piece of writing and it being an accurate account are mutually exclusive, the two attributes do overlap. As Marsh notes, the historical and topographical details in John often give rise to symbolism and provoke theological thought, and can be just as important as the fictitious component of the signs in encouraging faith in the reader. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Christianity section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Christianity essays

  1. The Gospel was written to prove to non-believers that Jesus Christ is the Son ...

    the law , and he must be killed and on the third day be raised to life" Throughout Luke's Gospel Jesus tells parables to people , heals the sick and preaches the good news He showed his divinity as the Son of God by doing miracles like walking on water and calming a storm.

  2. Discuss and assess the view that according to the author of Lukes gospel it ...

    Additionally Jesus' disciples were all sinners from the start. When Jesus ate with tax collectors and other sinners after he called Levi to be his disciple the Pharisees questioned him why he was doing so. Jesus claimed that "it is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick.

  1. Key people

    They are seen as 2nd class citizens and often faced opposition. The widow at Nain for example was classed as an outcast because she had no male representative. Likewise Bridgit encountered opposition from her father in deciding to dedicate her life to God.

  2. Assess the view that the signs in Johns Gospel are actually early Christian theology. ...

    Marsh suggests that Jesus is presented as a 'New Moses' in the Feeding of the 5000, which is a metaphor for Christ superseding Judaism. It should be noted that Dodd disagrees that there is any significance to the fact that Jesus sat on a mountain, believing it to be purely of topographical significance.

  1. Outline and explain the issues included in uncovering the historical Patrick (30 Marks)

    There have been many unsuccessful attempts to agree on the location of the birth of Patrick; however there has been an agreement on three basic points that must be taken into account when trying to determine the location. The first of these is that it would have to be in the West of Britain.

  2. Why were the signs so controversial at that time? John uses the term ...

    She told Jesus "They have no more wine" (John 2:3). These words symbolise the fact that Judaism no longer had the "Wine" of salvation. No one could enter a wedding without being purified and this was done with water filled stone jars.

  1. Give an account of the missionary outreach of the Celtic Church in Britain? ...

    for Aidan, and it is said he even went and retrieved the head of his beloved Oswald from the battlefield, and laid him to rest at Lindesfarne. Aidan "transcended the political basis of his mission...and managed to cross the divide between two feuding dynasties" (Charles Edwards.)

  2. With reference to the topics you have ...

    Finally, St Paul says, that ?flesh and blood cannot inherit the Kingdom of God? because they are part of the perishable body, whereas it is an imperishable body that rises to new life. Yet these arguments have been outright rejected by the majority of scholars, who favour the idea that St Paul did actually believe in a bodily resurrection.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work