• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Abosolute and Relative morality

Extracts from this document...


Absolute & Relative Morality In order to discuss the differences between the two and their strengths and weaknesses in conjunction with cultural relativism, we first must determine what they are. An absolutist would say that a rule, prohibition or command is the same for all time, no matter the situation or time. They have the belief that if it is wrong from an objective point of view; and not from yours or mine. They say that immoral acts or intrinsically wrong, which means they are wrong within themselves, the situation and outcome of said situation is irrelevant; an act is wrong if it breaks a moral rule. A relativist approach is that no two situations are the same, and that a persons choice is related the unique set of circumstances set out in their lives; and it ...read more.


From this perspective the judicial system is undoubtedly relative. However this is where the absolute beliefs come into play when considering the judicial system, the beliefs of a relative is that it is pointless to find moral rules is contradicted; this is because we know the law and what we can do by the law. Kant says that we should act according to maxims that we would want to see as universal laws. These laws are absolutist, we can work them out logically prior to experience; they are not verified through experience; otherwise known as 'a priori'. In a case of an abortion debate, if the question 'is it right to abort a foetus' arises. An absolutist would say categorically yes or categorically no. ...read more.


From my understanding so far cultural relativism (developed by Franz Boas) is the principle that an individual's human beliefs and activities should be understood in their own culture. Basically, no matter what your own personal beliefs are you should accept the fact that others have made decisions that may conflict with your own beliefs. Cultural Relativism fits almost perfectly in today's society. We live in a multi-cultural society and we are surround by people of other philosophies, religion and beliefs. We may not notice it on a conscious level but everyday we are living the cultural Relativism by letting people have their own beliefs that affect them personally. This is not true however for some certain things like politics; where people will force theirs beliefs and undermine the beliefs of others as they think it is for the greater good. Sean Tomlinson. Ethics. Ms. N. Mckenna ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Examine what is meant by natural law with reference to morality and analyse and ...

    is absolutely and universally morally wrong. If morality is purely subjective, one societies moral code can be no better than another. Therefore, without absolute morals, one could not condemn terrorism or prevent Suttee. Natural law enables people to establish common rules to structure communities.

  2. "Humanitarian intervention, which is ruled out by realism and the morality of states, can ...

    But this point is arguable, as there can be mixed motives in the use of humanitarian intervention. It is a widely held belief that, had there not been any oil in Kuwait, the international community would not have acted as decisively as they did.

  1. Religion and Morality

    is imprisoned for allowing a teddy to be named after the prophet Muhammad. If not for religion, these arguably ridiculous acts would never be justifiable. Hume said on the subject, 'the errors in religion are dangerous; those in philosophy only ridiculous.

  2. Examine and comment on Christian beliefs about homosexuality

    7 This decision by the Anglican Church to allow Gene Robinson to continue preaching shows how the religious acceptance of homosexuality is slowly changing through the denominations. The Roman Catholic views on homosexuality are summarised in the catechism paragraphs (2357-2359).

  1. Is there a link between Morality and Religion?

    No, you probably wouldn't - this then mean maybe morality is opposed to religion "God involves a total, unqualified commitment to obey his commands and that such a commitment is not appropriate for a moral agent, since to be a moral agent is to be autonomous or self-directed agent" Rachel

  2. Explain the differences between absolute and relative morality. 'Relativist theories give no convincing reason ...

    This is a straightforward description of what the world really is like - in England, now, in 2012, it is illegal to commit active euthanasia as it is seen as morally wrong. In Switzerland it is legal as it is seen as morally acceptable.

  1. Explain the difference between Absolute and Relative Morality

    The difference, though, is that each of these morals must have a rational basis. They must, in other words, be shown true in most cases, either logically or perhaps from past experience. Another important difference is that these morals are general guidelines, but not one-size-fits-all mandates.

  2. Explain the differences between Cultural Relativism and Cultural Absolutism

    As Randall Terry said ?You have relativism...you have anything. How long before child pornography is mainstream?? Cultural absolutism aims to solve this problem, it is the idea that although there are differences in culture, and we should accept those,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work