• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Abosolute and Relative morality

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Absolute & Relative Morality In order to discuss the differences between the two and their strengths and weaknesses in conjunction with cultural relativism, we first must determine what they are. An absolutist would say that a rule, prohibition or command is the same for all time, no matter the situation or time. They have the belief that if it is wrong from an objective point of view; and not from yours or mine. They say that immoral acts or intrinsically wrong, which means they are wrong within themselves, the situation and outcome of said situation is irrelevant; an act is wrong if it breaks a moral rule. A relativist approach is that no two situations are the same, and that a persons choice is related the unique set of circumstances set out in their lives; and it ...read more.

Middle

From this perspective the judicial system is undoubtedly relative. However this is where the absolute beliefs come into play when considering the judicial system, the beliefs of a relative is that it is pointless to find moral rules is contradicted; this is because we know the law and what we can do by the law. Kant says that we should act according to maxims that we would want to see as universal laws. These laws are absolutist, we can work them out logically prior to experience; they are not verified through experience; otherwise known as 'a priori'. In a case of an abortion debate, if the question 'is it right to abort a foetus' arises. An absolutist would say categorically yes or categorically no. ...read more.

Conclusion

From my understanding so far cultural relativism (developed by Franz Boas) is the principle that an individual's human beliefs and activities should be understood in their own culture. Basically, no matter what your own personal beliefs are you should accept the fact that others have made decisions that may conflict with your own beliefs. Cultural Relativism fits almost perfectly in today's society. We live in a multi-cultural society and we are surround by people of other philosophies, religion and beliefs. We may not notice it on a conscious level but everyday we are living the cultural Relativism by letting people have their own beliefs that affect them personally. This is not true however for some certain things like politics; where people will force theirs beliefs and undermine the beliefs of others as they think it is for the greater good. Sean Tomlinson. Ethics. Ms. N. Mckenna ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. "Humanitarian intervention, which is ruled out by realism and the morality of states, can ...

    The varying stances of realism have differing views on the topic of humanitarian intervention. Interpretive realism argues that states always pursue only their own national interest, national interest being the interest of the citizens of that state. Hence humanitarian intervention should never occur, as it needs a humanitarian motive.

  2. Examine and comment on Christian beliefs about homosexuality

    But, since the Church still regards the main purpose of sex to be procreation, they insist that any sexual act must be open to conception in order to be ethical. On this basis, they do not condone the use of artificial methods of birth control, and consider any sexual behaviour

  1. Religion and Morality

    There are theories in concurrence with Autonomy which allow still for a good, firm morality without dependency on religion such as Utilitarianism (greatest good for greatest number)

  2. Examine what is meant by natural law with reference to morality and analyse and ...

    Both the purpose and the aim explains why the statue is as it is. In the case of the child growing into an adult, the final cause would be the adult that the child grows into. Aristotle also believed that everything had a final 'good' which is achieved by fulfilling the purpose for which it was designed for, i.e.

  1. Examine the key ideas of one critique of the link between religion and morality. ...

    good action or to refrain from a morally wrong action is because it conforms to the will of God.

  2. Explain the differences between absolute and relative morality. 'Relativist theories give no convincing reason ...

    This is a straightforward description of what the world really is like - in England, now, in 2012, it is illegal to commit active euthanasia as it is seen as morally wrong. In Switzerland it is legal as it is seen as morally acceptable.

  1. Explain the differences between Cultural Relativism and Cultural Absolutism

    This shows that because of their need to survive, their morality is different to ours. However, there are also problems with cultural relativism. There are lots of barbaric practises found in other cultures, for example FGM, and cultural relativism would suggest that we would accept that as a difference in cultural norms and that we could not criticise it.

  2. Explain the difference between Absolute and Relative Morality

    The difference, though, is that each of these morals must have a rational basis. They must, in other words, be shown true in most cases, either logically or perhaps from past experience. Another important difference is that these morals are general guidelines, but not one-size-fits-all mandates.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work