• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Absolutism and Relativism

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Absolutism and Relativism Objective moral truths In certain moral situations, it is thought by absolutists that a moral truth is objective, which is that it is thought that certain moral situations are either intrinsically right or wrong. This moral truth is universal and unchanging in all circumstances, cultures, times and places. Plato was an absolutist and he thought that as well as things being inherently right and wrong, he thought that goodness itself really exists beyond this world. The highest form, the form of goodness provoked the question of 'What is goodness itself?". Plato thought that goodness itself was the highest form of reality, which is an objective or absolute thing that existed eternally, beyond our limited world. He valued goodness very highly, comparing it to having the same importance that the sun has. Plato thought that every moral situation was either right or wrong, and that our minds which were "distorted between pleasure and pain" could not perceive circumstances correctly, because we could not comprehend goodness itself, and therefore could not judge on which situations were right or wrong. ...read more.

Middle

A relativist would say that just because they think that euthanasia is wrong does not mean that others think the same and will carry out their lives based on your beliefs. They know that different people will react differently to different circumstances and that although one thing might be right for one person, it can be wrong for another. Another form of relativism is cultural relativism. This is where that in one culture certain activities would be socially condemned, whereas in another they would be praised. For example, in some countries polygamy is not only praised but necessary, whereas in countries such as England, polygamy is illegal and only monogamy is carried out. Relativists such as J.L. Mackie believes that "there are no objective values" and he thinks the fact that there have been so many different views and values in different times, places, cultures and countries that one set of morals cannot possibly exist and is shown through this. ...read more.

Conclusion

They maintain that some things are intrinsically right and other things are intrinsically wrong, and that these things are fixed for all time and all people and no one is exceptional. Absolutism means that there is no double standards, no unfairness from circumstances and there are moral codes which are set in stone in reinforced. An absolute set of moral truths cannot be determined by humans as human society is always changing and therefore so will be their perceptions on moral situations. The biggest argument for relativism is that it seems to be the most lenient and least extreme way of dealing with certain issues. Relativists live in a more tolerant society and it is in these circumstances that all types of people can live together and get on with each other. Relativists understand an absolutist's point of view, but have a different one themselves and make judgements based on individual circumstances and their own personal moral compass. This means that no one gets unfairly pigeon-holed and treated the same as someone from a completely different background. Relativists understand that because everyone is unique, so are their moral truths. Laura Keane ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Explain the difference between moral relativism and cultural relativism

    Lastly, it would allow prejudices to come in. If people are allowed to make their own decisions then there will always be someone who disagree with them. This would result in prejudice that could have a large negative impact on the state of the world. One of a cornucopia of reasons people find relativist theories are fair is utilitarianism.

  2. RE euthanasia for and against

    Bentham clearly expresses this when he states, "The principle of utility is meant to... augment or diminish the happiness of the party in question"12. This is the greatest good for the greatest number and it can be argued that perhaps terminating someone's life might be the greatest good as their loved ones no longer have to see the patient suffer.

  1. Moral absolutism. Moralism seems to be an essential component of American conservatism, whose adherents ...

    which is ever changing and no place for such rigid beliefs such as this. Secondly the theory of moral relativism upholds that there are no universally valid moral principles, opposing the theory of moral absolutism. Relative morals can change according to the situation, where as absolutism leaves no flexibility for certain situations.

  2. Ethical Issues Involved In The Legislation of Euthanasia?

    Our value as human beings does not depend on anything else. Nor does it depend on whether we are having a good life that we enjoy, or whether we are making other people's lives better. We exist, so we have value.

  1. Expalin the concept of Moral Relativism

    After this ask if it would work out as the most loving thing. Finally, Fletcher says that something being right or wrong depends on the situation. If an action will bring about an end that serves love the most then it is good.

  2. Moral Relativism

    Moral Relativism allows people to choose their own code of behaviour as long as it is within the law of society, an act may be good for one person but bad for another, or good in one cultural setting but bad in another, but cannot be either good or bad alone.

  1. Considering the claims of both absolutism and relativism, discuss the importance of situation ethics ...

    Therefore situation ethics is a relativistic approach but it has only one absolute, and that is to do what best serves love. Joseph Fletcher, a relativist, expands on situation ethics and the relativistic approach. His work diverges significantly from traditional Christian ethics and has criticised by tradition Christian moralists, but

  2. Explain the differences between Cultural Relativism and Cultural Absolutism

    and Yemen, it is very dangerous to women?s health but some people in the country would try to justify it by saying that because it has been happening for many years, it is tradition, and cultural relativism would say that we could not disagree with that, therefore, some people think

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work