• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Absolutist Rules Always Good or Sometimes Bad?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Absolutist rules - always good or sometimes bad? Absolute morality remains true in all situations. This is not always the right approach; however, sometimes such a resolute view is necessary. There are many occasions in which absolute rules are good. The fact that they are unchanging, no matter the circumstance, has many benefits. In some cases, people are unsure as to what is right, and so a constant rule would enabled them to make guided decisions. For example, if someone is murdered but had provoked their attacker, then some may argue that the murderer was not entirely at fault and that the punishment should be reduced, whereas others, such as absolutists, would state that murder is murder, and that no compassion should be shown. ...read more.

Middle

In many circumstances, it is not always possible to do the right thing, and on occasions, people are forced to do bad things. For instance, if a woman was being raped and accidently killed her attacker out of self-defence, then she cannot be convicted of murder. They also allow no room for improvement or differences in culture. In many countries or religions, what we regard as wrong, may be completely acceptable, and vice versa. For instance, we as a culture believe that the Death Penalty should only be used as the very last of resorts in the most extreme of circumstances, such as genocide, whereas as places such as North Korea are very liberal with condemning people to the Capital Punishment. ...read more.

Conclusion

For some Christians, say, the Bible's Ten Commandments are absolute, and must be used to help govern one's choices on a daily basis. Conversely, for many other Christians, the Ten Commandments are merely guidelines, and they believe that, at the end of the day, God is merciful, and would not, for instance, condemn a homeless man who stole shoes from a shop to clothe his child. And so, for some, Absolutist rules are always right because they show the ways of 'Goodness', yet for others, they are unsympathetic and do not take into consideration the moral intentions behind an act. Even if a man's actions are what is commonly regarded as wrong, if his intention was to help another who is in distress, then morally, the man is not a bad person. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Capital Punishment

    'image' and by insulting or harming a human being they are in result harming or insulting God. Christians believe that humans do not specifically have the 'image' of God in their visual appearance, but rather that we have the God image in our nature, which makes us special.

  2. Arguing against the death penalty. Truly there is no purpose to the Death Penalty ...

    As many great thinkers have said, our laws are too often directed at the results of social problems rather than the problems themselves. People don't care anymore. They don't care about their religion, their government, their laws, or each other.

  1. `Always tell the truth and Always keep your promises' Kant's Categorical Imperative.

    without considering that as rational beings they ought always to be esteemed also as ends, that is, as beings who must be capable of containing in themselves the end of the very same action.' (pp. 47-8) We can clearly see the connection between the second formulation of the categorical imperative and the second discussion of the promise-keeping maxim.

  2. Should capital punishment be reinstated?

    It has also been proved that capital punishment does not deter crime but increases them. Some believe that it is because people will not have to live with the memories of the crime. Another reason, that is often overlooked, is the distress the innocent family and friends of criminals must

  1. If ethics are an individual's belief about what is right or wrong or good ...

    A code of ethics should provide guidance but does not intimidate employees. Being a moral person does not necessarily equate to one becoming a moral manager and it is not enough to assume that one's employees will observe these qualities based on the limited interaction that occurs between manager and employee.

  2. Abortion and Religions.

    Churches like the Church of England,and Islam think that abortion is sometimes a "necessary evil", and should not be used for trivial reasons. Buddhism, Sikhism and Quakers believe that there is no written law on abortion, they believe that abortion is a sin as they pregnancy increases but they do

  1. Capital Punishment - analyse the views of Ernest van den Haag and Hugo Adam ...

    However, personally I would have to say that I take a much harsher and tougher stand in capital punishment. One that is not discussed by either philosopher. Of course in a perfect world murder would not exist and capital punishment would not be needed, but in this world murder and those who commit murder are very much real.

  2. DNA and capital punishment

    Eventually, the police and prosecutors settled on the wrong suspects: Rolando Cruz and Alejandro Hernandez. Even though their convictions and death sentences were repeatedly overturned on appeal, the prosecutors continued to retry them. They were not officially cleared and released until 1995.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work