• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Analyse the key concepts of religious experience as an argument for the existence of God and evaluate the view that this argument supports the probability of the existence of God.

Extracts from this document...


Analyse the key concepts of religious experience as an argument for the existence of God and evaluate the view that this argument supports the probability of the existence of God. (40) The phenomenon of religious experience is described as contact between an individual and a transcendental reality. For many, such direct experience provides definite proof for the existence of God, so that the argument in this form is certainly a posteriori. Religious experiences are varied in both form and intensity, and are largely seen as positive and subjective; that is, such encounters are open to individual interpretation. Most are termed as 'mystical' in that there is an element of spiritual recognition of truths beyond normal understanding involved. Experiences including prayer to life-changing conversion are grouped under this category, and indeed there have been many famous examples throughout history. Most forms of religious experience are referred to as 'mystical'. ...read more.


James recognised through his work the importance of separating genuine experiences to those perhaps induced by consumption of alcohol or drugs, since after taking such the mystic feels a greater depth of understanding, leaving a profound feeling even when the effects have faded. However, at a similar time to James, F.C. Happold claimed that rather than establishing set criteria to identify religious experiences, it would be more sensible to provide a context in which to think about them. In his book 'Mysticism - A Study and an Anthology', he divides experiences in to two groups: those of love and union, and those of knowledge and understanding. By setting out a context in which we might consider different religious experiences, we are aiming therefore to prove the validity of such incidences. The main problem for using them as an argument for the existence of God is the problem of validation. ...read more.


Consequently, religious experience would have to be found to be life-enhancing to be worth of our credence. In other words, a genuine religious experience would need to affect the individual in a positive, life-enhancing way. Another key weakness in using religious experience to prove God is the fact that such incidences will always be subjective; that is, they are open to interpretation and this interpretation will vary from person to person. No objective criteria can be applied to them in order to judge their merit or authenticity. While one person may interpret the need to convert and indeed do so, another person may not do so. It would seem then that religious experience as an argument for the existence of God is only applicable for the individual concerned, and may well do much to strengthen the existing faith of the believer, as highlighted by C.S. Evans. However, it is perhaps appropriate to conclude that the argument is probably of value to the non-believer only in as much as it points to another area of human life that might involve a divine being. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess Empiricism. In this essay I intend to seek the values of Empiricism ...

    4 star(s)

    If Empiricists were to say that you could form the concept of the missing shade - which seems plausible - it means that it is possible to form a concept which has no corresponding impression. However, this goes against the Empiricist principle that nothing can exist in the mind that hasn't come through the senses.

  2. Examine the main strengths and weakness of the Cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    explanation of the universe cannot likewise be as easy and minimal as the Cosmological argument claims. The Cosmological argument seeks to find a complete explanation or "sufficient reason" (Gottfried Leibniz) for the existence of the universe. The argument reaches the conclusion that God is the ultimate and complete explanation for the universe.

  1. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    first cause of which this cannot be said, then all the things which exist will only be caused by what shares with them the need to be accounted for with reference to a cause.43 The cosmological argument seems to be saying that there cannot be an infinite series of causes; that the buck, so to speak, stops somewhere.

  2. Assess whether religious experience demonstrates the existence of God?

    The sceptics retort to this argument is how can we trust our empirical methods of justification. One could be hallucinating, the only reason St. Paul saw God was because he was deprived of water and had social pressures from the rising Christian religion.

  1. The Goodness of God

    Then why call him a God?" There is an obvious tension between the existence of evil and God's attributes of being omnipotent and omnibenevolent. As Epicurus summed up, an omnipotent being would be able to get rid of evil and an omnibenevolent being would want to get rid of evil.

  2. Explain Descartes(TM) wax argument and evaluate the conclusions he draws

    Descartes says that we therefore know the wax through our intellect (mind). The only characteristics that remain after the change of the wax are that it is extended, flexible and changeable. We learn this through our intellect and it "is perceived from the mind alone."

  1. Assess the view that the design argument provides a convincing proof for the existence ...

    The classical idea of God is that he is benevolent; therefore he is the only being that fits the requirements of the designer. One also notices that objects within the universe seem to be working towards an end purpose, much like the fact 'humans are goal orientated' (1)

  2. Outline the teleological proof of the existence of God

    This argument is very similar to Paley's approach, but it seems to me that his argument is a very unsatisfying answer. So Philo (Hume) reduced this argument to absurdity by saying that there could be possibly be more than one god.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work