• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Analyse the key concepts of religious experience as an argument for the existence of God and evaluate the view that this argument supports the probability of the existence of God.

Extracts from this document...


Analyse the key concepts of religious experience as an argument for the existence of God and evaluate the view that this argument supports the probability of the existence of God. (40) The phenomenon of religious experience is described as contact between an individual and a transcendental reality. For many, such direct experience provides definite proof for the existence of God, so that the argument in this form is certainly a posteriori. Religious experiences are varied in both form and intensity, and are largely seen as positive and subjective; that is, such encounters are open to individual interpretation. Most are termed as 'mystical' in that there is an element of spiritual recognition of truths beyond normal understanding involved. Experiences including prayer to life-changing conversion are grouped under this category, and indeed there have been many famous examples throughout history. Most forms of religious experience are referred to as 'mystical'. ...read more.


James recognised through his work the importance of separating genuine experiences to those perhaps induced by consumption of alcohol or drugs, since after taking such the mystic feels a greater depth of understanding, leaving a profound feeling even when the effects have faded. However, at a similar time to James, F.C. Happold claimed that rather than establishing set criteria to identify religious experiences, it would be more sensible to provide a context in which to think about them. In his book 'Mysticism - A Study and an Anthology', he divides experiences in to two groups: those of love and union, and those of knowledge and understanding. By setting out a context in which we might consider different religious experiences, we are aiming therefore to prove the validity of such incidences. The main problem for using them as an argument for the existence of God is the problem of validation. ...read more.


Consequently, religious experience would have to be found to be life-enhancing to be worth of our credence. In other words, a genuine religious experience would need to affect the individual in a positive, life-enhancing way. Another key weakness in using religious experience to prove God is the fact that such incidences will always be subjective; that is, they are open to interpretation and this interpretation will vary from person to person. No objective criteria can be applied to them in order to judge their merit or authenticity. While one person may interpret the need to convert and indeed do so, another person may not do so. It would seem then that religious experience as an argument for the existence of God is only applicable for the individual concerned, and may well do much to strengthen the existing faith of the believer, as highlighted by C.S. Evans. However, it is perhaps appropriate to conclude that the argument is probably of value to the non-believer only in as much as it points to another area of human life that might involve a divine being. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess Empiricism. In this essay I intend to seek the values of Empiricism ...

    4 star(s)

    If Empiricists were to say that you could form the concept of the missing shade - which seems plausible - it means that it is possible to form a concept which has no corresponding impression. However, this goes against the Empiricist principle that nothing can exist in the mind that hasn't come through the senses.

  2. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    Such a question may be beyond reach of science and shows the point at which philosophy must take over. Effectively it labels the explanation for the existence of the Big Bang as 'God'.48 Conclusion: Like the teleological argument, the cosmological argument suffers from our uncertainty of whether or not the

  1. Examine the main strengths and weakness of the Cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    explanation of the universe cannot likewise be as easy and minimal as the Cosmological argument claims. The Cosmological argument seeks to find a complete explanation or "sufficient reason" (Gottfried Leibniz) for the existence of the universe. The argument reaches the conclusion that God is the ultimate and complete explanation for the universe.

  2. Religious experience presents a convincing argument to prove the existence of God. Analyse this ...

    Many people argue that encountering God is a like a sense experience in that just as you can encounter a table, you can also encounter God. Saying this it is also argued that the two things are still very different.

  1. Compare and contrast the contributions of Descartes and Humes on the issue of the ...

    This is the very thing the fork says is impossible. One could conclude that Hume's 'Fork' is to weak to be able to object to Descartes ontological argument. An objection to Hume's theory of causation that is used to object to Descartes cosmological argument is that surely not all constant conjunctions are causes.

  2. The Goodness of God

    even if God does command it. These problems in Exodus leave us with an ongoing problem today - how can a good and loving God expose mankind to the sheer amount of undeserved suffering that they experience?

  1. Outline the teleological proof of the existence of God

    Male and female maybe, even a whole society of gods that could be born and eventually die. There could be even institutions of gods learning how to make a universe and that ours was a "rude attempt of some infant deity who then abandoned it, ashamed of his lame performance".

  2. What are they key features of the design argument for the existence of God?

    Taylor maintains that mind or intelligence is required in order to explain how this improbable state of affairs could arise. Human beings plan ahead and nature gives evidence of similar planning. It is then argued that mind cannot be explained by evolution, as evolution itself requires a mind in order to impose it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work