• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Analyse the key strengths for the existence of God based on religious experience

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

A2 Religious Std - Existence of God based on Religious Experiences Analyse the key strengths for the existence of God based on religious experience. (18 marks) To debate whether religious experiences can be used as a proof for God's existence we must first decide what constitutes the term. A religious experience is unique and occurs when an individual has a personal encounter with the divine; the occurrence is non-empirical and is often perceived to be supernatural. Such experiences can be brought about by different means: they are either spontaneous, such as the conversation of St Paul in the Acts of Apostles as well as being a result of intense religious training and discipline, such as the practices of Sufi orders of Islam as well as various Christian sects and cults. ...read more.

Middle

Critics often discredit religious experiences as a means of universally proving God's existence by suggesting that such experiences are limited to the recipient and no one else; hence as long as one has not experience God, they cannot believe in God nor can they trust the accounts of those who claimed they have. This argument has been successfully rebutted by Swinburne along with other scholars put forward the Principle of Credulity, arguing that unless we have evidence to prove against recipients, we cannot say that they are untrue accounts and therefore must accept it. He states that "In the absence of special considerations the experiences of others are as they report them." ...read more.

Conclusion

The Principle of Credulity adds strengths to the argument as it successfully counters one of the main skepticism of religious experience thereby forcing us to have a serious philosophical debate on this matter. God revealing himself to human thereby connecting with believers, it is logical for him to want to seek out with believers The profound effect of religious experience proves that there was an experience in the first place which in terms prove God's existence. (Nikki Cruse) Experiences are spiritual and unique hence irrationality should not be used as an argument against religious experience but rather a feature of it. ?? ?? ?? ?? Jason Wong (Housman) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    Brian Davies takes the position that the cosmological argument cannot stand alone as proof for the existence of God, and would have to be supported by other evidence. b.) To what extent do the weaknesses of this argument limit its effectiveness?

  2. Moot-court Reflective Report.

    The judge had noticed this, as when I got feedback on my moot, it said that my argument was too scripted and I was not ready to answer questions. This is because I was very nervous, but after doing the moot I realised it was not that bad.

  1. Religious Experience presents a convincing argument for the existence of God. Analyse this claim.

    The experient is able to recall what happened to them when they "died" after they have been resuscitated. A corporate experience is where a large group of people witness events that they perceive to be religious. Examples of these include the Toronto Blessing and the Florida Outpouring.

  2. Analyse the key strengths for the arguments of the existence of God based on ...

    The argument takes the form that experience of X indicates the reality of X, experience of God indicates the reality of God, it is possible to experience God and therefore God exists (ie is really present). This faces many criticisms; an example is Ayre who maintains moving from an individual

  1. Assess whether religious experience demonstrates the existence of God?

    David Hume and A.J. Ayer are well known empiricists. They would argue that unless something empirically verified it should not be deemed meaningful so if I was to see God that should be seen as meaningful as it is empirically verified. If I were to see a cat walking across a street I would

  2. Proof and Probability in Arguing for God's Existence.

    Either God exists or 7+5=14 (2) It is false that 7+5=14 (3) Therefore God exists This is a valid deductive argument in that the conclusion follows from the premises. If the premises are true, the conclusion is certainly true. But it is not a 'good' deductive argument.

  1. Examine the strengths and weaknesses of the argument for the existence of God based ...

    A further argument that attempts to prove religious experiences to be true and therefore proving the existence of God, is one that focuses on the subjective testimonies of individuals who claim to have had religious experiences. It attempts to find similar characteristics and draw from these a general conclusion that

  2. Discuss the issue that it is pointless to analyse religious experience

    But there is a large amount of doubt that should go hand in hand with this. As Kierkegaard writes, ??doubt is conquered by faith, just as it is faith which has brought doubt into this world??. If this is the case, then there is little point in analysing religious experience

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work