• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

animal experimentation

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

EXAMINE AND CONSIDER RELIGIOUS AND ETHICAL RESPONSES TO ANIMAL EXPERMINATATIONS In this Essay I will be examining and considering religious and ethical responses to animal experimentation reviewing whether the argument for or against outweighs the other. One of the questions facing society today is whether animals should be used in scientific experimentation. Animal experimentation is widely used to develop a range of medicines and to test the safety of them and other products. But many of theses experiments cause pain and suffering upon animals and some end up with a reduced quality of life. If it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer then experimenting on animals produces serious moral problems. Animal experimenters are very aware of this ethical problem and acknowledge that experiments should be made as humane as possible. They also agree that it's wrong to use animals if alternative testing methods would produce equally valid results. More than 2.7 million live animal experiments were authorised in Great Britain in 2002 is this ethically and religiously moral? The number of testing on animals has halved in the last 30 years as the laws and restrictions have become tighter, the British law requires that any new drug that has been produced must be tested on at least two different species of live mammal. One must be a large non-rodent however UK regulations are considered some of the most rigorous in the world and the Latest figures show Animal experimentation is up overall by 3.2% to 12.1 million in 2005. This is despite European Commission and member state's individual promises to reduce and replace the use of animals in experiments. ...read more.

Middle

However, for our discussion on animals it is important to understand that the animals are to be used by men for our needs. In Genesis 1:26-27 it says that Then God said, "Let us make man in our image, in our likeness, and let them rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, over the livestock, over all the earth, and over all the creatures that move along the ground." So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them In Genesis 9 there is a change between man and animal. Up until this point in history animals were not used as food. However, God now puts certain animals in the diet of mankind. God also puts fear into the animals, so that they fear mankind. Again animals are used as to fill the needs of men. However, God continues His command in verse 2 to watch over these animals. One of the most important names in respect of animal Rights and Christianity is Peter Singer who wrote the book animal liberations starts of by noting that, for some, the idea of Animal Liberation might seem like a joke, or parody of other "proper" liberation and freedom movements. This is similar to the way that Andrew Linzey begins Animal Theology - by saying that some people would seriously question the idea of an animal theology. Peter Singer therefore begins this work with an examination of the case for the equality of women. ...read more.

Conclusion

Christian philosopher Andrew Linzey feels that Animals should have some rights because of their status as creatures of God. Their position comes from their position of vulnerability. He believes one fundamental Christian principle of the duty of the strong to help the weak, as animals do not have a chocie wheather to participate in animal testing I would regard them as weak, in order to be a good Christian it would make sense to protect the weak and claim an end to animal testing. (Linzey, 1990) For my conclusion in my opinion I feel that overall the Pros for Animal experiment heavily overweigh the cons both from a religious and secular point of view. In order for the human race to continue their needs to be sacrifices and animals are one of these, it makes sense that if millions of animals are being slaughtered across the world for food and skin it provides a valid excuse to use them in experiments that benefit the human race. I would rather work for a ban on animals being used as meat and fur that for animal experimentation as we can have alternative food but there is no alternative especially for medical science that can provide the accuracy than animal testing provides. This decisioin was based after examining and considering ethical responses from secular and non secular views drawing up the image that human structure, rights, values and emotions are far more perplex than those of an animal. Books I have used www.defra.gov.uk Internet forum, 2008 http://www.peta.org/ 1. The bible 2. Animal Liberation by Peter Singer 1975 3. Animal Rights and Wrongs by Roger Scruton 1997 4. Animal Theology by Andrew Linzey 1994 5. The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique", 6. The Case for Animal Rights ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Examine the differences in ethical and Christian views concerning homosexuality

    He says "The idea that we may punish offenders against a moral code, not to prevent harm or suffering or even repetition of the offence but simply as a means of venting or emphatically expressing moral condemnation, is uncomfortably close to human sacrifice as an expression of religious worship."

  2. Consider the arguments for and against paid organ donation.

    There are some religions with views against general organ transplantation. Jehovah's Witnesses and Gypsies in particular are against organ transplantation, with Gypsies believing that in their after-life, their soul maintains a physical shape which must remain in tact. Jehovah's Witnesses do not agree with blood transfusion, having interpreted "keep abstaining

  1. 'Euthanasia should be legalised. Agree or Disagree?'

    It is also questionable as to whether doctors can be sure that they know and understand all the facts. It could also be possible that they may fear a future which will not be realised. Thus any euthanasia process would have to establish, beyond any doubt, the true intentions of

  2. The Ethical Debate Concerning Cloning.

    Let me list some, only by title. What are we to do or not do, morally regarded, about such matters as truthtelling in medical diagnosis and disclosures of medical records; voluntary sterilization; transplants and implants; intensive care and resuscitation; defective newborns and high-risk pregnancies; in vitro fertilization in embryology and

  1. The 21st century has raised more problems for equality than it has solved. Examine ...

    Sexual pleasure is often pursued in egotistical way, meaning that freedom of the individual is the main principle. However, the acceptance of homosexuality has only really been recognised within the 21st century and some form of equality can be proven through acts, laws and rights introduced.

  2. Utilitarianism.After Bentham had established that pleasure and pain were the important factors in determining ...

    The benefit of act utilitarianism is that it has flexibility, in that it can be changed to suit a new situation at any moment. Bentham past away and he's ideas where challenged without any one to respond on the behalf of Bentham, that was until the young child prodigy John Stuart Mill was born.

  1. TQM (total quality management).

    * Whistle blowing also forces customers to question the organization that is accused. Consumers may wonder if there are more unethical practices that are being performed by the organization and not just the one made public. * Whistle blowing usually results in law suits, or legal investigations which are unfavorable to the organization.

  2. Modern life-prolonging technologies have sharpened some ancient dilemmas on the value of life.

    QL, SL proponents need not believe their theory is weakened by its failure to solve it. If lives are equally valuable, then it is a sign of the tragedy of life, not the weakness of the theory of equality, that some decisions are unmakeable.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work