• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

animal experimentation

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

EXAMINE AND CONSIDER RELIGIOUS AND ETHICAL RESPONSES TO ANIMAL EXPERMINATATIONS In this Essay I will be examining and considering religious and ethical responses to animal experimentation reviewing whether the argument for or against outweighs the other. One of the questions facing society today is whether animals should be used in scientific experimentation. Animal experimentation is widely used to develop a range of medicines and to test the safety of them and other products. But many of theses experiments cause pain and suffering upon animals and some end up with a reduced quality of life. If it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer then experimenting on animals produces serious moral problems. Animal experimenters are very aware of this ethical problem and acknowledge that experiments should be made as humane as possible. They also agree that it's wrong to use animals if alternative testing methods would produce equally valid results. More than 2.7 million live animal experiments were authorised in Great Britain in 2002 is this ethically and religiously moral? The number of testing on animals has halved in the last 30 years as the laws and restrictions have become tighter, the British law requires that any new drug that has been produced must be tested on at least two different species of live mammal. One must be a large non-rodent however UK regulations are considered some of the most rigorous in the world and the Latest figures show Animal experimentation is up overall by 3.2% to 12.1 million in 2005. This is despite European Commission and member state's individual promises to reduce and replace the use of animals in experiments. ...read more.

Middle

However, for our discussion on animals it is important to understand that the animals are to be used by men for our needs. In Genesis 1:26-27 it says that Then God said, "Let us make man in our image, in our likeness, and let them rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, over the livestock, over all the earth, and over all the creatures that move along the ground." So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them In Genesis 9 there is a change between man and animal. Up until this point in history animals were not used as food. However, God now puts certain animals in the diet of mankind. God also puts fear into the animals, so that they fear mankind. Again animals are used as to fill the needs of men. However, God continues His command in verse 2 to watch over these animals. One of the most important names in respect of animal Rights and Christianity is Peter Singer who wrote the book animal liberations starts of by noting that, for some, the idea of Animal Liberation might seem like a joke, or parody of other "proper" liberation and freedom movements. This is similar to the way that Andrew Linzey begins Animal Theology - by saying that some people would seriously question the idea of an animal theology. Peter Singer therefore begins this work with an examination of the case for the equality of women. ...read more.

Conclusion

Christian philosopher Andrew Linzey feels that Animals should have some rights because of their status as creatures of God. Their position comes from their position of vulnerability. He believes one fundamental Christian principle of the duty of the strong to help the weak, as animals do not have a chocie wheather to participate in animal testing I would regard them as weak, in order to be a good Christian it would make sense to protect the weak and claim an end to animal testing. (Linzey, 1990) For my conclusion in my opinion I feel that overall the Pros for Animal experiment heavily overweigh the cons both from a religious and secular point of view. In order for the human race to continue their needs to be sacrifices and animals are one of these, it makes sense that if millions of animals are being slaughtered across the world for food and skin it provides a valid excuse to use them in experiments that benefit the human race. I would rather work for a ban on animals being used as meat and fur that for animal experimentation as we can have alternative food but there is no alternative especially for medical science that can provide the accuracy than animal testing provides. This decisioin was based after examining and considering ethical responses from secular and non secular views drawing up the image that human structure, rights, values and emotions are far more perplex than those of an animal. Books I have used www.defra.gov.uk Internet forum, 2008 http://www.peta.org/ 1. The bible 2. Animal Liberation by Peter Singer 1975 3. Animal Rights and Wrongs by Roger Scruton 1997 4. Animal Theology by Andrew Linzey 1994 5. The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique", 6. The Case for Animal Rights ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Examine the differences in ethical and Christian views concerning homosexuality

    The fact that humans can punish other humans for doing nothing but expressing their sexuality seems morally wrong in itself. To punish someone for something which they cannot help and did not choose is a far greater and unchristian way of dealing with the issue than allowing them to be homosexual in the privacy of their own homes etc.

  2. Consider the arguments for and against paid organ donation.

    from blood2" in the Bible to mean that blood transfusion between humans is wrong. If some religions mean particular people cannot participate in organ transplants, it would be unfair to offer the option of this money to some of society and not others for a religious belief that they hold.

  1. 'Euthanasia should be legalised. Agree or Disagree?'

    While oppressing voluntary euthanasia, people have developed caring and sensitive environments for the terminally ill within the hospice movement. Therefore it is possible that legalisation of voluntary euthanasia would effect the culture in which that approach to care has been developed.

  2. The Ethical Debate Concerning Cloning.

    This was the primitive God of the Gaps-the God whose role was to fill in the gaps in man's knowl- 2 J. Fletcher, "Ethics and Euthanasia," American Journal of Nursing, 73 (April, 1973),670-675. 3 Boston Evening Globe, April 13, 1973.

  1. The 21st century has raised more problems for equality than it has solved. Examine ...

    However, the Wolfenden Report was very much debated and consequently on 12th May 1958, the Homosexual Law Reform Society was founded to campaign for the implementation of the Wolfenden Committee's recommendations. In the 21st century, views on homosexuality still differ and create some confusion, due to developing and changing laws and attitudes.

  2. animal experimentation

    (Bentham, 2005) However in contrast to the views of Bentham and Singer many people feel that animal testing is the right way forward as it provides many benefits for the human race. Most medical advances such as vaccines against diseases like rabies, polio, measles, mumps, rubella and TB and antibiotics

  1. Utilitarianism.After Bentham had established that pleasure and pain were the important factors in determining ...

    Bentham was an act utilitarian; an act utilitarian believes that a person should apply the principle of utility when ever possible, the principle of utility must be directly applied in any situation. An act utilitarian believes that a person must never judge a situation in an empirical way and must treat every event in it's own way.

  2. The Dreamings as being fundamental to Aboriginal cultures & societies

    belief systems & society. ( 1788 ( Terra Nulius conveniently adopted ( Eur. believed Abor. to be primitive w/ no laws or beliefs ( 1789 ( Culture conflict: Abor. start to resist, unsanctioned killings of Abor. ( 1800 ( Policy of 'Civilisatn' ( 1820s ( Ch.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work