• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Arguing against the death penalty. Truly there is no purpose to the Death Penalty other than vengeance, yet it seems that our society has sunk to such a level that even vengeance is acceptable to most.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Against the Death Penalty The Death Penalty is, undeniably, one of the most controversial issues of our day. Emotional tensions are high between those who hold human life above justice and those who hold justice above all human life. The Death Penalty, along with all other forms of criminal punishment, is barbaric. This form of punishment, indeed all forms of criminal justice, truly shows the level to which society has sunk. When people stand outside prisons and cheer as prisoners are murdered, there is a problem. When personal bloodlust is held above moral ideologies, there is a problem. When human life is assigned a value and weighed against other alternatives, there is a problem. The state speaks of Justice, but this word is only a reflection of the confusion, anger, and hatred that has fermented within this country, indeed within the very foundations of human society itself. Truly there is no purpose to the Death Penalty other than vengeance, yet it seems that our society has sunk to such a level that even vengeance is acceptable to most. The state, though, mimics every abhorrent quality of a punishable act of murder; a murder committed in anger is punished with an execution committed in anger; a cold, calculated, murder committed with pleasure is met with the same form of execution. The end result is the same and the feeling with which it is carried out is the same. ...read more.

Middle

How can one justify something through anger and hatred? One might argue a disbelief in this ideology, but it's advocate must reply that he lacks a belief in the ideology of this form of justice; an ideology of hatred; an ideology which, its moral standing presently under heated debate, is still being used to affect, direct, and, ultimately, exterminate human lives. When one or more of our numbers, from the depths of pain and loss, drowning in a sea of hatred, falling into the abyss of their own despair, raises up their voice from the midst of their delusions and screams, cries out, begs for vengeance in a way only the tortured soul can, will we listen? A tear slides down the human face and falls into the dirt. We cannot follow it. A human tear, when mixed with the dirt, becomes something vile; a human mind, when mixed with the dirt, becomes something evil. Save for religion there are few other ideals people adhere to so fanatically as criminal justice. Among all other social concepts justice is unparalleled with respect to the level of effort which is expended in the pursuit of its fulfillment. It seems that the supporters of this barbarity are willing to hold it above all else. America has been rampantly executing immigrants from other nations without ever contacting their embassies, in complete defiance of international law. We have watched people burned alive in the electric chair in Florida. ...read more.

Conclusion

Orwell needed only one Goldstein to maintain his tyrannicism; the American government needs millions. Perhaps, in the Death Penalty as well as all other forms of criminal justice, our society finds an outlet of savagery and barbarity, a method by which we can legally lower ourselves to a point that has long been socially forbidden. The problem with falling so low so often though, is that, eventually, we will reach a level too low to return; a level so low as to merit the loss of the term human. Reciprocal Punishment is not the solution. This antiquated and barbaric eye-for-an-eye form of Justice is a primitive, savage, and ultimately mindless way of addressing the problem of crime. If law is supposed to be objective and independent from religion why is it based on these ancient and barbaric doctrines of a God that is more evil than divine? How can we defeat violence with violence? How can we defeat murder with murder? How can we defeat anger with anger? In doing so we merely assist the propogation of circumstances, the existence of which we claim we are trying to end, in our own actions and in our own minds. Have these foolish practices solved any of our problems? What of peace? Why, still, must people die? Perhaps if we go to the trouble of finding out we can end the problem, instead of having to delude ourselves into believing that murder will save the world. The road to peace is not paved with blood. Mankind must realize that peace bought with murder is not peace at all; it is merely the silence of death. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Essay on Law vs. Justice

    "The culture at Enron became one that rewarded cleverness."[3] Enron's former President and Chief Executive Officer Jeffry Skilling actively cultivated a culture that would push limits- Do it right, do it now and do it better was his motto. He encouraged employees to be independent, innovative and aggressive.

  2. Should capital punishment be reinstated?

    the USA, 116 people who were sentenced to death have been found innocent since 1973 and released from death row. The average time on death row before these pardons was 9 years. It is also hypocritical for the government to say that one person cannot kill another but they can legally.

  1. Contraception. In this essay I will be analysing and examining whether the use of ...

    It is them alone to point out what we ought to do, as well as to determine what we shall do' (Bentham, 1789, Chapter I, I)3. Bentham believed that all human beings pursued pleasure and sought to avoid pain. In other to apply Utilitarianism philosophy to the concept of a

  2. Shakespeare's Purpose in Subverting the "Moral Universe" in Hamlet, Measure for Measure, and the ...

    Other instances of inverted "moral universe" are: the mother marrying the uncle in haste, friends betraying each other, the wrongful murder of Polonius, and the King sentencing Prince Hamlet to death. These situations proceeded from the act of murder of Hamlet Senior.

  1. Modern life-prolonging technologies have sharpened some ancient dilemmas on the value of life.

    has not only relieved untold suffering, but has made many previously intractable ethical problems simply disappear. A dramatic example is the effect of antiseptic surgery, which first made possible Caesarean sections which were safe for the mother. Before the 19th century, if a fetus were hydrocephalic or for any other

  2. Moral absolutism. Moralism seems to be an essential component of American conservatism, whose adherents ...

    While this type of morality may seem at first harsh and unneeded the strengths which it can deposit in people is an undeniable factor in why religion employs it in its practices. For example, the 10 commandments are supposed to be Christianities moral guide's, they are their unbreakable moral

  1. Capital Punishment

    The protestant view of Capital Punishment was derived into factors where it is equally diverse. St Paul favours the death penalty and tends to take the New Testament into disagreement. The utilitarian approach is bound to regard punishment itself as undesirable, epically in the founding of Jeremy Bentham.

  2. Examine and comment on Christian beliefs about homosexuality

    There is enough evidence within the Bible to suggest God condemns it and therefore it is sinful and should not be done. The Protestant Church believes from a Biblical stance that homosexuality is wrong; thus condemning the activity. The Anglican community is unsure on their stance on homosexuality, they are

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work