• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Aristotles final cause

Extracts from this document...


Explain what Aristotle meant by the final cause. The 'final cause', the most important aspect of Aristotle's theory, is the theory that all objects have an ultimate reason for there existence, an ultimate purpose, ends, or goal. For example, the final cause for a statue is that the sculptor wants to create a beautiful object for decorative or memorial reasons. The final cause is the most important as the material, efficient and formal causes would be pointless under logical without a final cause. When we do something it is for a reason. Causes of all four sorts are necessary elements in any adequate account of the existence and nature of the thing, Aristotle believed, since the absence or modification of any one of them would result it the existence of a thing of some different sort. No matter how intriguing the object is if it does not answer to the question what is it for? then your interest will fade. ...read more.


What are its characteristics (For example, a table has four legs and a flat surface on the top - it belongs to the "furniture" group) -Final: the purpose of the object. What is it for? (For example, A table is a useful surface to put things on) This theory argues that the Prime Mover (for Aristotle) or God (for Aquinas/Christians) is the final cause of the universe. Aristotle believed that all movement (by which he meant change) requires a mover (a 'changer'). If A changes (and everything in the world does change), then it must have been changed by B. Aristotle argued that this chain must eventually lead to something that causes change but is itself unchanged or unmoved. Aristotle did not just mean that something must have started the chain in time. He believed that there was a kind of change that was 'outside time' or eternal. ...read more.


It makes sense to say that man-made things have a final cause (purpose) e.g. the final cause of an axe is to chop. But how do we establish the final cause/purpose of natural (non-artificial) things (e.g. suns, trees, people)? And it's an untrue statement that we will loose interest if things don't have a purpose. Why does there have to be a beginning to a connecting chain? Couldn't the existence of events be compatible with no beginning? Some critics maintain that Aristotle's Unmoved/Prime Mover is incoherent. His argument seems to depend on the idea that nothing can cause itself but then contradicts itself by saying that 'God' does exactly what it just claimed was impossible. On the other hand, most things in this universe do have a purpose, and it would be a fair statement saying such a thing. It is a believable theory that with scientific evidence could easily be an accepted statement. But in modern times, without sufficient evidence people are reluctant to believe in pretty much anything. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Plato versus Aristotle on well being

    So to be virtuous one must practice at it; human well being for Aristotle involves 'living well' and exercising virtue is a necessary condition of this. Aristotelian virtue ethics are more specific than Plato's, he talks of virtue in a more systematic sense.

  2. A) Explain what Aristotle meant by the final cause.

    From this idea, Aristotle understood that everything physical is transient, that if something was to move, then another thing must have caused it and so on, so he tries to figure out the cause of movement.

  1. Describe Aristotle's teaching about the difference between the final cause and the other sorts ...

    possible to The Prime Mover, so it is also like a Final Cause. The reason for Aristotle believing The Final Cause to be the most important one makes a lot of sense. The first question that springs to mind when seeing something is usually "What does it do?"

  2. Explain Plato's and Aristotle's ideas of form, body, knowledge and soul.

    Many, and a human problem; he had to battle against the sophists. Sophists were professional philosophers who lived in Athens at the time of Plato. They were sceptics, who believed that there was no such thing as certain knowledge. Plato spoke out against them.

  1. Describe Aristotle's teaching about the differences between the final cause and other sorts of ...

    The other three causes could be leading to anything but the final cause expresses the reason for the object's existence. It is the end or purpose for which a thing exists. The final cause tells you whether the object has for filled its purpose.

  2. Aristotle - Forms of Cause and Causality

    and formal cause (e.g. the head goes on the neck) have all been actualised ! In this way, they have fulfilled their purpose and any other connections are now obsolete. For example, once a baby is born, the mother's womb will never serve any purpose to the child ever again.

  1. Explain Aristotles idea of the four causes.

    For example; what does the heart do? We know scientifically but why do we have to live like this? He came to the conclusion that nature itself did not have a conscious mind. The purpose that the object is trying to achieve is somehow inside the object already without knowing.

  2. Comapring Aristotle's Prime Mover and the Judeo-Christian God

    in the Bible in the Parable of the Sheep and the Goats. Aristotle believed that the Prime Mover was the Final Cause, and therefore all our actions are directed at him, another way of thinking about this is that everything in the universe is drawn to the Prime Mover like a magnet.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work