• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Asses the claim that humans are not free to make moral decisions

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Assess the claim that human beings are not really free to make moral choices Whether or not humans are free to make moral decision or have ?free will? is one that has produced much controversy over the many years it has been debated. There are 3 main stances to this argument, those being ?Hard? Determinism, ?Weak? Determinism and Libertarianism, all of which will be discussed in the following essay. Strict determinists, such as Baron Holbach, perceive the idea of free will as an illusion due to the determined outcomes that could be predicted by the right knowledge of the causes that affect us however Libertarians such as Roderick Chisholm perceive our freedom as requiring a self, which intervenes in our decision-making. ...read more.

Middle

are able to go unpunished, which consequently would make the world in which we live an incredibly unsafe place. In my opinion I believe in the weak determinism theory that suggests some things of what we do is predetermined but we still do make choices. This is because a lot of what we do is determined on our up bringing our phenotype etc which produces a limited choice, but still a choice nonetheless. Hard Determinism is the belief that a determinate set of conditions can only produce one possible outcome given fixed laws of nature. ...read more.

Conclusion

For example we can say if someone is thirsty they will try to find a drink, but this is not always true, they may be fasting for example, there is no way of listing all the possible outcomes meaning that there is not just one possible outcome, even with something as basic as thirst. Another issue is that genes do not, on their own determine a unique effect, they only ever have an effect through interaction with the environment, for example, someone may have a gene for being tall, but how tall they become depends on their diet. Lastly, the same could be said about our upbringing, just because we are brought up to behave in one way it doesn?t mean that we always will. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. All of our Choices are Predetermined

    to explain the consistency and successes of this particular scientific discipline if we do not accept that our choices are determined in some way.

  2. Our freedom to make ethical choices is an illusion Discuss

    Furthermore they would argue about our freedom and use the argument of Intuition. They believe that unlike robots we have a mind, and having a mind is necessary to have free will. Peter van Inwagen used the analogy of choosing which branch to go down when travelling along a road,

  1. Assess the claim 'Our lives are determined'

    Fatalism does not deal with the causal necessity that determinism does. Going back to the idea of the water on the floor, a determinist would say this is only possible if the water pipe had burst. A fatalist on the other hand would simply say the water will be on the floor regardless of what happens prior to the event.

  2. Was J.S.Mill Right to Claim that Suppressing an Opinion is 'Robbing Mankind'

    If there is no truth outside of our beliefs or opinions then his second reason for the non-suppression of opinions is not tenable, as one opinion cannot be 'improved' by incorporating the truth from another opinion. In this case an opinion being suppressed does not 'rob' mankind, as it is not stealing from them the opportunity of anything.

  1. Sartre is a very strong proponent of strong determinism, that is, he does not ...

    My thoughts seem to directly influence what physically ends up on this paper. On the same token, my limbs do not move involuntarily. At least they do not seem to move independent of my desires, they move where I tell them to, when I tell them to under perfectly normal circumstances.

  2. Do humans have innate knowledge?

    available to children learning a language, and therefore that this knowledge is supplemented with some sort of innate linguistic capacity. Chomsky has maintained that much of this knowledge is innate, implying that children need only learn certain parochial features of their native languages and are assisted by LAD?s, which are metaphorical language acquisition devices in our brains.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work