• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Asses the claim that it is the definition of human life that lies at the heart of the abortion debate.

Extracts from this document...


Asses the claim that it is the definition of human life that lies at the heart of the abortion debate. There are many religious arguments associated with abortion, arguing that sanctity of life and the commandment "you shall not kill", prevent abortion from being morally acceptable. However, this is dependent on when the ball of cells inside the mother can be defined as an individual human life, and not just an extension of the mother's body. Some people believe that life begins at contraception, for example Catholics, yet at this stage the fertilised ovum is just a clump of cells, and it is not even possible to define which cells will go on to form human cells, and which will form the cells of the placenta, surely this cannot be considered a human life? ...read more.


On the other hand I do not think that just because cells are recognisable as human, it means that the embryo is a human being. Judith Javis-Thompson argued that although an acorn has all the potential to be an oak tree, there is a continuous growth from an acorn to an oak tree, and an acorn is not an oak tree. Similarly, an embryo is not yet a human person, but will slowly become one over time. I agree with this as I think it is inconsistent that an embryo should be an extension of the mother's body one day, and a human being the next. ...read more.


However, there are other issues involved in the abortion debate that focus more on the balance of rights between the mother and the foetus than on the definition of human life. For example, if the mother's life is in danger, most people would agree that the mother's rights to life come before that of the child, as the mother has dependants. Yet, if a Catholic believed very strongly that a foetus is a human life and abortion is murder, then the mother would have the same rights to life as the foetus, and the mother may feel obliged to put her life in danger to save the foetus. Therefore, ultimately, even issues involving rights are dependent on the definition of human life and at what stage a foetus is considered to be a human. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Consider the arguments for and against paid organ donation.

    other circumstances; therefore, an absolutist, utilitarian or relativist could argue that there would be little difference in costs because so few people would come forward to donate an organ anyway, and other negative effects of the paid system would create a worse situation than without the system.

  2. The Ethical Debate Concerning Cloning.

    Typically Roman Catholic view of reproductive technologies is negative. In condemning cloning, the Roman Catholic Church stressed that every human has "the right to be born in a human way" and Pope John Paul II called for an unconditional worldwide ban on the use of cloning.

  1. Discussion of abortion

    If someone did have an abortion a catholic would respond with 'Condemn the sin but not the sinner'. Therefore Catholics would forgive the woman, as they believe that all people can be forgiven, however Catholics will never accept an abortion because it is wrong.

  2. is abortion justified to save the mother's life

    This list undermines the right that any human being feels that they might have, in ending that of another human being. It follows: life, knowledge, play, aesthetic experience (or beauty), sociability (or friendship), practical reasonableness and religion. Finnus makes clear that these are good which constitute a valuable life, and so abortion is a great moral evil.

  1. Christian beliefs about abortion and contraception

    There are certain medical procedures that pregnant women can undergo which, indirectly, result in the death of the embryo or fetus. Under some circumstances, the church regards these as a moral choice. These involve an ethical principle called "double effect."

  2. How are religious and ethical principles used in the abortion debate?

    Modern day Utilitarian Peter Singer maintains that whether or not a foetus is actually a person or not is irrelevant to the morality of abortion, and thus while a human foetus may possess sanctity of life or a soul this does not make abortion immoral.

  1. Assess the claim that Free Will and Determinism are compatible

    Kant states we are determined in so far as animals, conditioned by the material world. Both Libertarianism and Hard Determinism fail to accept that sometimes in moral decision making there needs to be a compromise; If rain ruins your plans to travel, you are free to find alternate means as Hume upholds.

  2. Explore some of the arguments in favour of abortion

    Ethicists such as Singer have a utilitarian view of abortion. Singer hold to Preference Utilitarianism which promotes that the preferences of individuals are taken into account except where they come into direct conflict with the preferences of others. For example, if the foetus was diagnosed with a fatal abnormality abortion

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work