• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the claim that Free Will and Determinism are compatible

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Critically assess the claim that Free Will and Determinism are compatible [35] There is an important relationship between freedom and moral responsibility. I should be ready to accept the blame for the things that I freely do wrong. If I'm made to commit an immoral action, then I?m not blameworthy. If I'm forced at gunpoint to drive a getaway vehicle from a bank robbery, then it isn't my fault. Even if I'm forced at gunpoint to give money to charity, I'm not praiseworthy. Moral blame/praise can only be attributed to actions that are freely taken. Freedom is defined as the power to act, speak or think as one wishes. In general terms, Determinism is the view that all events and actions in the universe are the effects of other causes. Hard determinism relies heavily on the credence that as we are not free at all to act in a different way, we cannot be held morally responsible for our actions. As Aristotle maintained, "nothing happens without a reason". Honderich develops on this but relies on principles of Physics, namely Quantum Physics, to argue that determinism is much more complex - for instance, people may migrate across the planet and undergo profound social changes, yet their values dont seem to alter. ...read more.


Hume states it is not God who determines the limits of human beings' free will, it is nature that is in ultimate control of human destiny. Events are determined because of a causal link between objects (CONSTANT UNION OF OBJECTS). If you are wanting to travel to a particular destination by plane, and your journey is delayed due to extreme weather conditions - this delay was always predetermined. The individuals' response to this situation, leads onto human free will - the individual may choose to change form of transport, perhaps commuting by train, or may choose to not travel and delay the trip altogether. The individual is free to make the choice, Hume calls this INTERFERENCE OF THE MIND. Hume's compatabilist thinking counteracts three particular ideas: The first is Libertarianism, which states that human beings are entirely free. The next is hard determinism, which asserts that everything a human being does is predetermined. The last idea that Hume rejects is the idea of chance, or what ethicists sometimes call moral luck. The latter is regarded as nonsense by Hume, simply because events are determined. They are not random; take a scenario where an individual is confronted by a robber. ...read more.


In a similar example , The Queen of England holds a right to 'kill' anybody she so wishes and not be put under trial - arguably, she too has been conditioned to believe she is superior and more important than others, yet she chooses not to exercise this superiority out of free will, because it is against the norms and values of society - and also because murder is wrong. Leob and Leopold are no different. Libertarianism also comes under scrutiny as it becomes more complicated in its comprehension of what true freedom is. In real life, we will always be governed by the laws of the land, as well as in everyday scenarios. In that case, does this mean our very reality restricts us from true freedom? Even in institutions such as the Media, we are made to think in a certain way. Arguably then, it is impossible to be truly free. Another criticism that a geneticist may put forward, contrary to the Libertarian Sartre, is that infact our essence precedes our existence - as our essence is prevalent in our genetic makeup - some may be genetically gifted athletes, whilst others were born with genetic deformities. I would argue Soft Determinism, in this day and age is the most sensible and accurate form of moral decision making. It presents the balance of being both free and predestined and is coherent in its reasoning. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. "It is impossible to reconcile any kind of determinism with the concept of freewill." ...

    Freewill comprises choices not caused by, and independent of antecedent factors. Freewill tries to account for is our introspective conviction that we are in control of many of our choices, and thus our destiny - that we are free to think and decide.

  2. Ethical Criticism of McDonalds

    McDonald's also 'annually produces over a million tons of packaging used for just a few minutes before being discarded' (McSpotlight.org: Environment, 2005). Traditionally a number of ozone depleting gasses were used in polystyrene foam packaging. In the 21st century, McDonald's uses almost all recycled packaging.

  1. Consider the view that humans have no free will.

    if they were under the influence of drugs/alcohol or some kind of influence that caused the brain to act outlandishly) and they then commit an immoral action, they would not be fully morally responsible, although someone who has had a few too many may start a fight and things get

  2. The 21st century has raised more problems for equality than it has solved. Examine ...

    an intrinsic moral evil, and thus the inclination itself must be seen as an objective disorder'. Pope Benedict also stated that 'a person engaging in homosexual behaviour therefore acts immorally'. On the other hand, despite his strong belief against homosexual acts, the Pope called for empathy and compassion from followers.

  1. Humans are Eternal Beings

    Descartes believed, as another dualist, that both mind and body were separate. To understand Descartes' need for certainty, and his subsequent statement of 'cogito ergo sum', it is important to contextualise him. The 16th century was a time of great upheaval; the many paradigm shifts of the scientific community, and the morality-inducing Thirty Years War had many questioning their morality.

  2. Free essay

    Hard Determinism Negates Free Will, Discuss

    For example, a murderer cannot be held morally responsible for his/hers actions or receive any punishment .In addition the hard determinism theory makes all human beings to be just complicated machines. A Libertarian would argue that Determinist rely on contingent truths.

  1. Hard determinism and the religious approach to ethical living are not compatible"

    If are life's were predestined then there would be no temptation to sin or the need to repent our sins, more importantly Jesus "saving of our sins" and making us one with god again would have no purpose .Further, the idea of determinism completely undermines the religious understanding of judgement

  2. Compare hard determinism and Libertarianism.

    The challenge between the two then is that determinism speaks of the illusion of freedom and thus the absence of moral blame whereas Libertarianism disagrees. For hard determinists this idea of personality is completely unsatisfactory.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work