• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the claim that Free Will and Determinism are compatible

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Critically assess the claim that Free Will and Determinism are compatible [35] There is an important relationship between freedom and moral responsibility. I should be ready to accept the blame for the things that I freely do wrong. If I'm made to commit an immoral action, then I?m not blameworthy. If I'm forced at gunpoint to drive a getaway vehicle from a bank robbery, then it isn't my fault. Even if I'm forced at gunpoint to give money to charity, I'm not praiseworthy. Moral blame/praise can only be attributed to actions that are freely taken. Freedom is defined as the power to act, speak or think as one wishes. In general terms, Determinism is the view that all events and actions in the universe are the effects of other causes. Hard determinism relies heavily on the credence that as we are not free at all to act in a different way, we cannot be held morally responsible for our actions. As Aristotle maintained, "nothing happens without a reason". Honderich develops on this but relies on principles of Physics, namely Quantum Physics, to argue that determinism is much more complex - for instance, people may migrate across the planet and undergo profound social changes, yet their values dont seem to alter. ...read more.

Middle

Hume states it is not God who determines the limits of human beings' free will, it is nature that is in ultimate control of human destiny. Events are determined because of a causal link between objects (CONSTANT UNION OF OBJECTS). If you are wanting to travel to a particular destination by plane, and your journey is delayed due to extreme weather conditions - this delay was always predetermined. The individuals' response to this situation, leads onto human free will - the individual may choose to change form of transport, perhaps commuting by train, or may choose to not travel and delay the trip altogether. The individual is free to make the choice, Hume calls this INTERFERENCE OF THE MIND. Hume's compatabilist thinking counteracts three particular ideas: The first is Libertarianism, which states that human beings are entirely free. The next is hard determinism, which asserts that everything a human being does is predetermined. The last idea that Hume rejects is the idea of chance, or what ethicists sometimes call moral luck. The latter is regarded as nonsense by Hume, simply because events are determined. They are not random; take a scenario where an individual is confronted by a robber. ...read more.

Conclusion

In a similar example , The Queen of England holds a right to 'kill' anybody she so wishes and not be put under trial - arguably, she too has been conditioned to believe she is superior and more important than others, yet she chooses not to exercise this superiority out of free will, because it is against the norms and values of society - and also because murder is wrong. Leob and Leopold are no different. Libertarianism also comes under scrutiny as it becomes more complicated in its comprehension of what true freedom is. In real life, we will always be governed by the laws of the land, as well as in everyday scenarios. In that case, does this mean our very reality restricts us from true freedom? Even in institutions such as the Media, we are made to think in a certain way. Arguably then, it is impossible to be truly free. Another criticism that a geneticist may put forward, contrary to the Libertarian Sartre, is that infact our essence precedes our existence - as our essence is prevalent in our genetic makeup - some may be genetically gifted athletes, whilst others were born with genetic deformities. I would argue Soft Determinism, in this day and age is the most sensible and accurate form of moral decision making. It presents the balance of being both free and predestined and is coherent in its reasoning. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. "It is impossible to reconcile any kind of determinism with the concept of freewill." ...

    our ability to think and of the consequences of our choices - we can claim responsibility for our actions. These are the meaningful differences that give rise to the concept of freewill. God is said to be capable of acting in the world only through persuasion, and not by coercion.

  2. Consider the view that humans have no free will.

    if they were under the influence of drugs/alcohol or some kind of influence that caused the brain to act outlandishly) and they then commit an immoral action, they would not be fully morally responsible, although someone who has had a few too many may start a fight and things get

  1. Free essay

    Hard Determinism Negates Free Will, Discuss

    For example, a murderer cannot be held morally responsible for his/hers actions or receive any punishment .In addition the hard determinism theory makes all human beings to be just complicated machines. A Libertarian would argue that Determinist rely on contingent truths.

  2. The 21st century has raised more problems for equality than it has solved. Examine ...

    Although, the owner of the Bed and Breakfast also stated; 'I have nothing against gay people and we have some friends who are gay. If they want to do that then it is up to them, but I object to it under my roof'.

  1. Compare hard determinism and Libertarianism.

    The liberationist concludes then that since we all make decisions we must all believe that was can make choices, that we are free. In this way determinism, which rejects the existence of free will, it itself rejected by the universal experience of decision- making.

  2. Hard determinism and the religious approach to ethical living are not compatible"

    If are life's were predestined then there would be no temptation to sin or the need to repent our sins, more importantly Jesus "saving of our sins" and making us one with god again would have no purpose .Further, the idea of determinism completely undermines the religious understanding of judgement

  1. Humans are Eternal Beings

    The soul belongs to a higher level of reality than the body, and is a substance, is immortal, and it remembers its life in the spiritual realm, where you gain innate knowledge. Plato has a theory of forms to explain his views on knowledge.

  2. Modern life-prolonging technologies have sharpened some ancient dilemmas on the value of life.

    Because SL studiously disregards the quality, condition, or circumstances of a life, it must insist on heroic measures for vegetative patients just because they are alive.[Note 8] Because this duty is unbending, or because the value of life is overriding, SL proponents must divert resources away from secondary values, such

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work