• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the claim that the value of art lies in its ability to represent the world in some way.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Assess the claim that the value of art lies in its ability to represent the world in some way The claim in the question reflects the philosophical theory of art as representation, in which it is argued that good art should illuminate our experience, reveal ?truths?, articulate a ?vision?, be epiphanic, portray authentically or at least imitate or represent its subject convincingly. This theory has been influential throughout the ages, dating back to the Greek philosopher, Aristotle, who argued that good art can convey truths about the world through representation. This was in contrast to his teacher, Plato, who argued that art is twice removed from reality, being a copy of a material object, which itself is a copy of a transcendental ?Form?. However, Aristotle rejected this, instead arguing that art can play a valuable role in allowing the audience to encounter truths of reality. He used the example of tragic drama, through which the audience is able to face up to the tragic nature of life but in a distanced way ? we are always aware that it is a drama, not real, and so we avoid becoming overwhelmed by despair or grief. ...read more.


Supporters of expression theory claim that good art is moving or captures a mood or feeling. This is reflected in the fact that we describe and judge it using an emotional vocabulary. The Russian novelist and philosopher, Leo Tolstoy, argued that art is good if it is able to infect the audience with the emotions and feelings of the artist. For Tolstoy, good art is universally accessible and conveys moral feelings to the audience. Expression theory does seem to be a strong explanation for why we value art. After all, don?t we appreciate art when it is able to move our emotions, feeling joyful listening to Beethoven?s ?Ode to Joy? or sad when watching a film such as ?Schindler?s List?? Perhaps this is more important to the value of a work of art than simply whether it looks like or represents an object in the world? However, expression theory faces its own problems. Firstly, the genetic fallacy can be used to criticise the theory as it seems to value the art on where it came from (the emotions of the artist) ...read more.


He argued that ever object in the universe has some kind of form but it is only with the successful arrangement of component parts that form becomes ?significant? and can then stir in us an aesthetic appreciation of this form. However, the theory of form also has problems. Critics have pointed out that the qualities of form such as elegance, harmony etc. are vague and ambiguous, whilst others have branded the theory elitist ? there are those who ?get? the form and everyone else. As such, Nigel Warbuton argued the theory was unfalsifiable, i.e. there would be no possible situation in which the theory could be shown to be false. In conclusion, the claim that the value of art lies in its ability to represent is subject to the challenges of expression theory and form theory. However, these theories have themselves faced unresolved criticisms. When considering the three criterion of representation, expression, and form, it does seem that they all have appeal. With this in mind, it may be more productive to consider the perspective that it is a combination of all three, which frequently gives value to a work of art, rather than the futile attempt to prove that it is one of the three which gives art its essential value. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. An embodied life in heaven is entirely possible. Discuss.

    Often, the term 'Cartesian dualism' is used to refer to the general class of substance dualist theories. Substance dualists hold that mind and matter are different kinds of substances. Cartesian interactionist dualism is a particular kind of substance dualism supported by Descartes in which these two different kinds of substance can causally interact.

  2. Deontology has many strengths but it is justifiable to reject it. Clarify and assess ...

    because it follows logically that, if we accept God to be the creator of all things including morality, then we ought to do what he tells us to do. The Bible contains a consistent message that we should obey God's commands.

  1. How convincing is the claim that 'because art is informative, we value it'? (30)

    us according to Plato as it is deceiving, it is the most effective form of art. Another way of looking at the informative value of art is to think about the message that an artwork portrays, and how this can help us to illuminate our lives.

  2. Philosophy - analysis of Nietzsche, Sartre and Tolstoy

    entail for how we should think about our lives? Explain why you do, or don?t, find his views plausible. EXISTENCE PRECEDES ESSENCE: 1. When Sartres says that existence precedes essence, there was no set plan for humans 2. When we?re born, our lives weren?t planned out prior to our existence 3.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work