• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the claim that we can have synthetic a priori knowledge

Extracts from this document...


Assess the claim that we can have synthetic a priori knowledge Intro Before we can consider the claim that we can have synthetic a priori knowledge we must elaborate on the distinction of a priori/posteriori and analytic and synthetic knowledge. A priori knowledge is knowledge that does not depend on experience and a posteriori knowledge is knowledge that strictly does depend on experience. Referring to Kant's Analytic-Synthetic Distinction, an analytic knowledge is a proposition whose predicate concept is contained in its subject concept. For example 'all brothers are male'. The concept "brother" contains the concept "male"; the concept "male" is part of the definition of the concept "brother." Therefore we can say that all analytic knowledge is always true and saying otherwise is a self-contradiction making it a necessary truth. Synthetic knowledge on the other hand is a proposition whose predicate concept is not contained in its subject concept. For example 'all brothers are evil' in contrast to analytic truth the concept "evil" is not part of the concept "brother" even though it is possible that all brothers are evil it can be otherwise, making it a 'contingent truth'. Considering the debate between rationalism and empiricism it is hard to give a definitive answer to whether we can have synthetic a priori knowledge. Rationalism insists that we can have synthetic a priori knowledge though reason and logic and empiricism strictly the idea of it entirely. ...read more.


In terms of synthetic knowledge, you must understand the concept before you can grant the contingency of the idea. Empiricists would argue that all a priori knowledge is based on analytic propositions and therefore synthetic a priori knowledge is impossible. However once a rationalist can understand simple concepts, one can create a new idea which can be interpreted as synthetic a priori knowledge. Empiricism As an Empiricist, you are to believe that all knowledge comes from experience; in contrast to a rationalist you do not consider that there is innate a priori knowledge, nothing that gives you any understanding of the world given to you from birth. Empiricists are strictly a posteriori. John Locke claims that at birth we are void of all knowledge. This is known as Tabula Rasa; meaning that we are all born as a 'blank slate' which he claims we have no a priori knowledge of anything. With this being said we are therefore led to believe that we can only grasp knowledge of the world through our sense impressions; an external experience using our five senses of touch, taste, sight, smell and sound that are so forceful and vivid it is impressed upon us 'like a stamp'. These stamps 'furnish' our blank minds as we go through life. David Hume, also an empiricist, claims that our ideas are not our own, they are merely copies of an original sense impression, for example an idea of 'hard' or 'grey' are just copies of sensing hard or grey from seeing and touching a rock. ...read more.


Kant's synthesis combines the ideas of rationalism and empiricism and creates a theory that the mind has three categories: Sensibility (Empiricist) Reason (Rationalist) and Understanding (Empiricist and Rationalist). Kant claims the rationalists were right to think that a priori knowledge is possible, only instead of a priori revealing the structure and anatomy of things, it reveals the structure their experience must have. Conclusion After considering the claims on rationalism I have demonstrated how one can have synthetic a priori knowledge through understanding simple concepts and combining them into a complex idea. I have also assessed the arguments against rationalism from the empiricists who claim that all knowledge is derived from experience and therefore cannot have a priori knowledge at all. Nonetheless I have decided that we can have synthetic a priori knowledge; Kant's synthesis, in my opinion has supported the idea of rationalist a priori knowledge and the theory on space and time reinforces my argument. However for others to decide whether it is possible to decide whether synthetic a priori knowledge can be, I believe that it is completely down to the individual. If you are loyal to the empiricist view then you would not agree with the thought of synthetic knowledge. But if your heart beats with the likes of Descartes and Galileo then you would agree with the idea. ?? ?? ?? ?? Chris Septim Synthetic A Priori Paper Page 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess Empiricism. In this essay I intend to seek the values of Empiricism ...

    4 star(s)

    So if I was to encounter it again, I could recognise it but more importantly I am able to hold a belief about it - such as it helps me to stay awake. We also have inner impressions such as discomfort or happiness.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Assess Rationalism. In this essay I intend to seek the true values of ...

    3 star(s)

    Thus, to have the idea of God, we cannot have produced it (through experience); it must have been an innate idea. (Though this comes from Descartes Trademark Argument, primarily as a theory for God's existence, it also arguably justifies innate ideas).

  1. Assess Empiricism

    on an inductive argument, there is an even greater problem for Empiricists to overcome. That is that we may not necessarily be able to trust our senses. As Descartes points out as the start of his Meditations, he is unable to trust his sensory data as there

  2. Discuss the characteristics of the scientific method which makes it superior over other methods ...

    A correct inductive argument may have true premises and a false conclusion. Induction is not necessarily truth preserving. 3. New premises may completely undermine a strong inductive argument. Induction is not erosion-proof. 4. Inductive arguments come in different degrees of strength.

  1. How to create a completely peaceful world. To create a fully peaceful world, ...

    On the other hand, the world government may have to use war to stop the war. For example, if one nation invades another nation, the world government may have to attack the invader to force it to retreat from the victim country.

  2. How can we have knowledge? LOCKE ESSAY

    The mind identifies the agreement or disagreement of two ideas by their own immediately, exclusive of others' interference. Intuitive knowledge is the clearest and of most certainty, with no double nor hesitation. It is irresistible and immediately perceived by the mind.

  1. Locke says that before we experience anything our minds are blank, what he calls ...

    This is a view that can be associated with the real world. The empiricist's view that you are born with no knowledge works in that you must learn everything. First you have to decide what counts as knowledge. For example, a rationalist could argue that you are born able to

  2. Critically Assess the View that, Without a Predetermined Conceptual Scheme, Our Sense Experience Would ...

    This is because you will simply have no memory of where it might be, as there is no system to find it. In the same way, this can be applied to ?Condillac?s Statue?. Kant stated a set of categories by which he believed the mind organises raw sense data.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work