• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the role of faith in supporting religious belief

Extracts from this document...


Assess the Role of Faith in Supporting Religious Belief In 1877, William Kingdon Clifford propositioned in his book "Ethics and Belief" that belief in something without sufficient evidence is irrational. Whilst he accepted that in many beliefs there is often an epistemic gap between the evidence and the conclusion (inductive reasoning) he did also claim that "It is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence." Furthermore he claimed that that tolerating credulity (a tendency to believe readily) and superstition will damage ultimately society. He concurred with David Hume (1711-76) when he said "All wise men proportion their belief to the evidence." This stance - that belief without sufficient evidence is irrational - is called evidentialism, and is adopted by many atheists (including Clifford and Hume) in their view of theology. However, natural theology instead attempts to meet evidentialism on its own terms by trying to show that belief in God is actually rational. It draws collectively upon all of the a posteriori arguments for God's existence including the teleological, cosmological, moral and experiential arguments. However, it is rare that an atheist will be convinced by the evidence of these arguments anywhere beyond the point of agnosticism. It is generally accepted that belief in God requires some element of seemingly irrational faith. Indeed, the stance of fideism states that reason plays no part in belief. ...read more.


Could a child's belief in Santa Clause not be defined as properly basic? Plantinga would respond by saying that it is the beliefs directly connected to God's existence that are properly basic, rather than the belief in God's existence itself. For example, the guilt felt after committing a bad deed or the sense that something must have created and designed the universe. Blais� Pascal (1623-1662) deemed that it was reasonable to have faith in God by a sheer act of will, so certain was he that he put forward a wager: "Let us weigh the gain and loss in wagering that God is (exists)...If you gain, you gain all, if you lose, you lose nothing." By this, he meant that the theist stands the chance of gaining entrance to heaven at the risk of nothing, whilst the atheist however risks damnation to hell. However, surely this basis of self-gain is at odds with the teachings of the Christian church? W.K.Clifford suggested that God would deny heaven to those who followed Pascal's wager on the basis that faith should be founded upon trust and morality, not self gain. Pascal might have responded that true belief would arise from the habit of religion i.e. baptism, mass, prayer etc. However, this is contradicted somewhat by his opinion that one's relationship with God should be somewhat deeper. ...read more.


"to see oneself as a created, dependent creature, receiving life and well being from a higher source...the only appropriate attitude is one of grateful worship and obedience." - John Hick. To conclude; each of the arguments examined above vary in their relationship with reason, but what they all have in common is that faith is central to the believer and must work independently of reason to some degree. Some of the arguments incorporate reason, some reject it entirely, but the transcendent nature of God can never be proved, can never be indubitable, for faith is an integral part of religion. Perhaps then natural theology is not trying to prove God's existence to the point where faith is cast out and certainty resides in its place, but rather it is merely trying to explore God's nature. "I do not seek to understand so that I may believe, but I believe in order to understand" - St. Anselm (1033-1109) Proslogian 1. Natural theology could therefore be seen as an expression of faith, rather than a foundation for it. The majority of theists argue that faith is necessary, for if God proved himself to us, we would no longer have free will over our belief and so would be robots without dignity. On the other hand, surely God in His omnipotence could find some way of maintaining our freedom whilst simultaneously providing us certainty of his love? Why not give certainty to the millions of His helpless and suffering children who have lost faith; for where is their dignity? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Christianity section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Christianity essays

  1. The Ideas of Hell and Purgatory: A Wide Shift from Then to Now.

    In previous decades, the idea of a fiery hell with horrifying punishments was used to make people afraid of the possible consequences for their bad actions. On the other hand, freedom is a privilege, and when freedom is abused, penalties are given. God's law and man's law are different, however.

  2. Outline the arguments for the dependency of morality and religion

    One can therefore say that while morality does not rely on the existence of God, and the existence of God is not presupposed on the need for morality, that the two are linked. Our demand for a sense of ultimate morality, for a higher power to demand it, proves the existence of God.

  1. Critically assess the view that the two Patrick theory solves the puzzle of Patrick

    If we accept the theory that O'Rahilly suggests, then we are able to accept both dates suggested by the annals. It also gives us information about the famous Sen Ph�tric that is often referred to in Irish sources. There have been a lot of criticisms put forward regarding O'Rahilly's theory.

  2. Outline the cosmological argument for the existance of God. and plan.

    that God if may just be used to explain things we cannot yet understand through science. There may be a logical explanation that we cannot yet grasp to the creation of the universe, but until we find that God is given the job of being our explanation.

  1. Free essay

    RS Cosmological Essay

    In conclusion Aquinas drew the conclusion that the first mover and the first cause had to be God, the all-powerful being that sets everything else in motion. His argument was a Christian one although it was based on The Kalam argument, which is an Islamic on.

  2. 1.) Examine the evidence and reasons to support belief in God based on religious ...

    that such experiences do come directly form God, and consequently demonstrate that God exists. Firstly, the principle of credulity, states that if something appears to be the case, then, in the absence of contradictory evidence, it should be taken to be the case, and the principle of testimony, which states

  1. Faith should not be basis on reason alone. Assess this view.

    as ?like straw? potentially implying that he came to the conclusion that revelation is superior to reason further reinforcing the importance of revelation in faith rather than just reason alone. Clifford in contrast argues that it ?is unethical to believe anything on the basis of insufficient evidence? emphasizing the role

  2. No definition of a miracle is adequate. Assess this view

    requiring the physical intervention of God suggesting from the outset that it may be more adequate. This is because Holland only requires miracles to be an extraordinary coincidence of a beneficial nature interpreted religiously. The emphasis on interpretation also removes the difficulties associated with determining the cause of the miracle while still encompassing Biblical miracles.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work