• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the view that conscience is given to us by God.

Extracts from this document...


Lila Muneer Assess the view that conscience is given to us by God. The conscience is usually seen as a device for moral decision making, it gives us a feeling or sense of morally right or wrong actions. So where does the conscience come from? Thinkers such as Newman and Aquinas argue that the conscience is God given. However there is a strong case against this put forward by Piaget and Kohlberg. Newman believed conscience was the voice of God. He said the conscience should be as equally acknowledged as memory, reason and imagination as a part of our psychology. He claimed that the conscience is an indisputable fact of our psychology. For Newman the conscience is a device for governing our moral choices, he states that without conscience there could not be morality (precondition) and that conscience converts our moral feelings into moral rules, it is authoritative. This is proven by the fact that we feel guilt or shame when we ignore our conscience, we would not have these feelings if conscience did not have authority. As a result of this we are duty bound to obey our conscience. ...read more.


It makes no sense to say that our conscience can be wrong but we should follow it regardless of this fact. Perhaps the fact that we can make wrong decisions enables us to grow and develop our conscience further? The idea of real and apparent good seems rather na�ve. If no one ever knowingly does wrong why does there seem to be countless cases where people knowingly do wrong? For instance Hitler's mass genocide of the Jewish during the Second World War, despite knowing murder is wrong he ordered the deaths of millions. Looking at the flaws it seems that the views of Aquinas fall short. Unlike Aquinas and Newman, Piaget and Kohlberg argue that the conscience is not God given. They argue that conscience is a natural progression of our moral compass over time. Piaget's work involved playing marbles with boys of different ages and questioning them on the rules. He found that boys he worked with aged 5-10 thought that the rules of the game of marbles came from a 'semi-mystical' authority, such as older children or even God. These rules have always existed and can't be changed. ...read more.


Just as children learn to use the laws of grammar practically before they come to look at grammatical theory, children also learn to use the laws of morality before they acquire the skills to reflect upon the theory. The issue with Kohlberg is although he believed in the progression of conscience up to stage six he couldn't get enough people to define it, this begs the question of does stage six actually exist? The flaws of this theory are limited and do not seem to render this theory as invalid. In conclusion Newman's theory never recovers from the fact that conscience should be universal if it is in fact the voice of God. Aquinas' theory never recovers from the fact that idea of real and apparent goods is na�ve, people do knowingly do evil and the idea that we should follow our conscience despite it potentially leading us to do wrong still seems absurd. The idea that our conscience develops over time as put forward by Piaget and Kohlberg seems far more logical and coherent. The views of Newman and Aquinas on conscience seem to fall short as conscience can be better explained by Piaget and Kohlberg without the use of God. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Philosophy - Conscience (90/90)

    But where does this come into the idea of 'following' one's conscience? Simply put, it is the idea that the conscience is dominant in its essence; that theologians, philosophers and psychologists throughout times past have placed it above appetites and affections.

  2. Synoptic Study, Satre, Engels and Marx

    are part of our facticity in which we must exercise our freedom. The drug addicts child through might be more vulnerable to addiction than some one with out those genes but nether the less those genes do not entirely govern their life, they still posses the freedom to choose not

  1. Conscience is the voice of God - discuss

    In order to achieve a via media between the two, Proportionalism, which has been promulgated by Roman Catholic revisionists such as Hoose and Mahony, tries to deal with these precise issues. Proportionalists, while still following Roman Catholic Magisterium, would say that an action can still be intrinsically violating an informed

  2. Assess the view that conscience is not the voice of God, but is learned?

    he believed that it was innate to do good. Aquinas recognised that there were people in the world however who did wrong, he argued that these people who committed sinful acts were doing bad as they were not putting their conscience into practice and were instead ignoring it.

  1. Explain and evaluate the role of conscience in moral decision-making

    Newman also believed that the more relativist (atheist) a person is the less of a conscience they will have as they do not follow a God (an absolute unchanging moral authority).

  2. Critically assess the claim that the conscience is the voice of reason (35)

    Newman?s reasoning to believe that the conscience is the voice of God outweighs the belief that it is purely the voice of reason and consequently disagrees with the beginning statement. To reason and rationalise makes man different from animals and thus one may argue that the conscience is the voice

  1. The existence of evil makes belief in God impossible. Assess this view.

    The evidential problem tries to show that the existence of evil, although it could be logically consistent with the existence of God, lowers the probability of theism being true. For David Hume, the existence of evil makes it more probable that God does not exist, as he says in his

  2. Critically Assess the View that, Without a Predetermined Conceptual Scheme, Our Sense Experience Would ...

    to do on a day to day basis, such as mass calculations or playing chess. However, computers find it extremely difficult to perceive objects in the world, something we would find easy and natural. For example we can easily distinguish all the objects that may be resting on top of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work