• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess What Can Be Concluded From The Teleological Argument

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The teleological argument (often referred to as the Design Argument) deciphers that the world cannot have been a chaotic chance occurrence, but rather a well designed creation with a supreme creator who Paley observes to be God. For the purpose of this argument, we are referring to the God of classical theism who is supposedly, "all-loving," "all-powerful," and "all-knowing." The word 'telos' is Greek for aim, goal or purpose and the word 'logos' means reason and the relevance of these can be seen throughout the argument as countless philosophers over a period of more than 200 years have tried to prove, using this argument, that the world was created with an aim and purpose by God. With the publishing of the Natural Theology (1802) came the first comprehensive and detailed description of the Teleological Argument, by the Peterborough born William Paley, although Hume had published a similar idea many years previously. Paley was a devout Anglican and sought to prove the existence of God through reason, at the time he published many books about Christianity and philosophy which were very influential. Paley explains his argument simply to the reader by using an analogy of himself stood on a heath. He observes two objects initially, a stone and a watch. As he comes across the stone he decides that there is nothing to make him think other than that it has always been there and it has occurred naturally; it requires little or no explanation. ...read more.

Middle

From the evil in the world, we cannot assume an all-loving God, and from the diversity in the universe we cannot assume only one God; this contradicts the theory of the God of Classical Theism. There is also the argument that the cause of anything is only great enough to have caused its effect. From this we may establish that a contingent world would not have been created by a necessary being, i.e. God. The idea that there may be multiple God's was illustrated by an analogy of a ship: A ship has many builders, why can a world not have the same with many world builders? Several Gods may have co-operated on creating the world. Following on from this, Hume argues that if it's not the God of Classical Theism then why not an apprentice God? This would provide feasible explanation for the imperfections existent in the world. Furthermore, the teleological argument fails to prove the current existence of a God as the creator of the world could now be destroyed as is suggested by some Christians, this would add further explanation to the imperfections in the world. Hume's arguments should not be disregarded as although they differ from Paley's slightly in that they both use different analogies, Hume provides far more criticisms for his argument which come from a wider variety of approaches. In my opinion despite Paley's argument having a stronger case due to its relevance in modern society and links to an individually specified object, unlike Hume who seeks to relate to a wider population by using a more generalization of a man-made machine. ...read more.

Conclusion

This suggests that God and evolution are compatible in the sense that if things hadn't been created exactly as they are evolution could not have taken place and therefore the universe must have had a designer. This argument is a successful one for me, as it would support the view that God created the world then ceased to exist or that he created beings that would evolve to be humans, with their own free will. This would also justify the imperfections in the world as the free will given to humans allows them to do as they wish with the world. In conclusion, the argument may evoke a greater sense of wonder amongst people, although is unlikely to convince atheists as to God's existence. Criticisms of the argument will fail to dishearten those who already view the world with fascination either. The argument is does not prove the existence of one God or a God that is any of the characteristics outlined in the Classical Theistic description of God. The a posteriori nature of the argument means that it is not logically compelling yet fascinates countless numbers of people. In my own opinion I find the Anthropic Cosmological Principle most compelling with the ideal that God did have a hand in the creation of the universe yet much of it still relies on the natural process of evolution, which despite remaining a theory has strongly supporting scientific evidence (e.g. the pea plant experiment). ?? ?? ?? ?? Wednesday 1st November 2006 Assess What Can Be Concluded From the Teleological Argument (24marks) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The design argument is also known as the teleological argument. The argument looks at ...

    3 star(s)

    Hume also argued that we can only attribute to a cause whatever qualities are needed to produce the effect. So the design argument, if it works only proves the existence of a design producing being. We cannot also say that this being has any of the attributes traditionally ascribed to God (classical theism).

  2. Compare, contrast and evaluate Plato and Mill on the relationship between individual and society

    Children are to be removed from their parents and are not to know who their parents are and visa versa. They are to call all males old enough 'father' and all females 'mother', the purpose of this was to minimise private possessive emotions therefore reinforcing their focus on their relationship with their community.

  1. Outline the teleological proof of the existence of God

    This argument is devastating because Mill himself comes from a religious background so it would shake himself as a person because it is damaging to his own faith. Darwin's challenge is that natural selection can account for the diversity of the universe and just by looking at somewhere like the

  2. (A) Explain Hume's objections to teleological arguments (B) God is the most likely explanation ...

    A major factor in Hume's challenge to the teleological argument is that you cannot understand the design of the universe in the way we would understand the design of a man made product which is often the result of many minds collaborating to produce the best design.

  1. Compare and Contrast the Philisophical Contributions of Nietzsche and Mill to our understanding of ...

    It is the role and duty of the 'new philosopher' to cultivate it. Nietzsche strongly attacks religion. Especially Christianity. For Nietzsche, religion is a modern manifestation of political and social tyranny. Religion seeks to suppress the will to power. He refers to religion as "an ongoing suicide of reason" and

  2. "The design argument is challenged far more by science than by philosophy." Discuss with ...

    In this way, evolution can be compatible with the Design argument and there is not really a challenge at all. Another point that a believer in the design argument could argue is that Darwin's theory just assumes that all of this stuff happened from scratch and he doesn't explain why the his theory is there is the first place.

  1. Mills objection to the teleological argument is stronger than the objections of Hume. Discuss.

    Mill also furthered his criticisms as he suggested that nature itself causes natural evil and suffering such as earthquakes and tsunamis.

  2. Explain the origins and development of the teleological argument

    He then goes on to notice the fact that these natural bodies ?lack intelligence?. By this he means that they are not conscious of their own movement, yet even so they appear to move or act in regular fashion, as our daffodil flowers every spring time.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work