• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess whether 'God exists' is a testable hypothesis.

Extracts from this document...


Assess whether 'God exists' is a testable hypothesis Ultimately, God's existence cannot be classified as a 'testable' hypothesis. A hypothesis is a proposal, which can be tested and then either confirmed or rejected. God's non-physical state makes this virtually impossible, as we are unable to use our senses to confirm his presence or absence. Anthony Flew and Ludwig Wittgenstein's theories provide a considerable amount of evidence, which suggests that there cannot possibly be a religious hypothesis. Good introduction. Firstly, Anthony Flew's parable of the gardener is highly vital in the quest to prove that God's existence is not a testable hypothesis. The scenario includes two explorers, who discover a humanly made clearing, yet evidence suggests that it occurred naturally. Both explorers have contrasting views, one favours natural causes and the other favours human intervention. Subsequently, no evidence of the gardener is present, however is invisible. Flew's claim hinges on falsification,and if a religious claim cannot be falsified it is essentially meaningless, as the claimant hasn't allowed themselves to be proven wrong. The hypothesis of God's existence is relatively similar to this case, as God is 'transcendent' and beyond our experiences, which by Flew's logic makes the religious hypothesis meaningless, as it is not testable. ...read more.


Hick uses the parable of the Celestial city to illustrate this. It includes two men, who are travelling to the same destination, yet have contrasting expectations of what they will find. This parable hints towards Eschatological verification, which relates to Hick's argument that many claims are reliant on the presence of the afterlife. Nevertheless, critics suggest that we will never be able to truly verify our experiences. This essentially applies to the existence of God and heaven if God is a figure beyond our thoughts, it is hard to envisage how we will be able to identify that we are experiencing God and heaven, rather than merely a illusion. Moreover, 'Logical Positivists' possess the belief that all knowledge is derived from our senses. Therefore, if knowledge is not empirically gained, it is meaningful. God's alleged characteristics hint toward him being non-physical, making it impossible to empirically witness his existence. This led to logical positivists claim, that God's existence is not testable and the claim is meaningless, as it is empirically not verifiable and cannot be tested. Equally, the flaws within the verification argument are highlighted regularly. History and Science exploit the weaknesses for all to see. ...read more.


Despite this, faith is not without it's faults. Believers often require a purpose in life, which hey gain from a supernatural being.Ultimately,our faith in God may well stem from our own insecurities and the desire to feel that there is an afterlife waiting for us if we abide by God's rules. To conclude, ultimately, the existence of God's is not and will never be a testable hypothesis, for an array of reasons. The main issues arise from the fact that God can not be empirically proven, due to his non-physical state, making it far from testable, which makes it hard to provide support for the case of it being a hypothesis. The case brought forward by Anthony Flew and Ludwig Wittgenstein is compelling to say the least, as they highlight several issues, which back up claims that God's existence is not a testable hypothesis. The inability to falsify religious claims essentially makes them meaningless, as there is no possibility of the clamant being proved wrong, therefore since God's presence cannot be empirically know, we cannot test his existence. Wittgenstein highlights the subjective nature of nature, which prevents you defining a term, and he claims that hypothesis are scientists rather than believers. Therefore, we cannot label the God's existence as a hypothesis, as we're unable to gain access to it empirically or otherwise. Meaningful conclusion. Junaid O'Balogun ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Free essay

    Language game

    Also religious language alienates those outside the game, meaning that those who don't understand or have not yet learnt the rules, will misunderstand what is trying to be said. Furthermore the rules of the games cannot be changed to allow outsiders in which could be seen as unfair.

  2. `I know God exists, because I have an idea of perfection Discuss whether knowledge ...

    Also, the potential to gain knowledge only via sense experience appears far-fetched, due to it being virtually impossible to define a 'simple idea'. There is a lack of clarity surrounding when an idea can actually be classified as a simple one.

  1. The verification principle offers no real challenge to religious belief. Discuss

    The two explorers set a watch; they even use dogs to hunt for the gardener and put up an electric fence to detect anyone entering. No one is ever detected. One of the explorers says "there is a gardener, invisible, intangible, insensible to electric shocks, a gardener who has no

  2. "Religious Language is meaningless." Discuss.

    Both have similar experiences on the journey. One sees these experiences as gifts from God, while the other sees them as just luck or misfortune. Only when the two people reach their destination will they know the truth". This parable asks the question as to how it could be verified

  1. The debate about religious language starts with the question of whether God can be ...

    This link between us is a link between our attributes and God?s attributes. This is most clearly explained with an example. Brian Davies gives the example of the bread and the baker. The bread is good because the baker is good and so the goodness relies on the link between them.

  2. Outline and assess the main objections to representative realism

    where I did not see it; thus we shall have to suppose that it did not exist at all while I was not looking, but suddenly sprang into being in a new place. If the cat exists whether I see it or not, we can understand from our own experience

  1. The world appears designed, so God exists - Discuss

    For example, an arrow does not direct itself towards its target but needs an archer to direct it. Therefore (by analogy) there must be some intelligent being which directs all unintelligent natural towards their end. This being we call God.

  2. The existence of evil makes belief in God impossible. Assess this view.

    J.L Mackie also created the ?Inconsistent Triad?, which shows that God?s attributes cannot be reconciled with the evil and suffering in the world and God?s loving nature. This argument uses deductive reasoning and is an a priori argument, which is contrasted to the following argument.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work