• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess whether the problem of moral evil casts doubt on the existence of God

Extracts from this document...


Assess whether the problem of moral evil casts doubt on the existence of God St. Augustine once defined evil as that "which we fear, or the act of fearing itself". He and Aquinas (1225-74) both deny the existence of evil as a thing in itself, but rather as an absence of good. This is linked to Aristotle (390-323 BC) and Plato's (428-348 BC) definition of good as the complete fulfilment of a being's natural telos. "[Evil is] nothing but the corruption of natural measure, form and order."-Augustine. More specifically however there are two sorts of evil; natural and moral. Natural evil is that over which humans have no control e.g. natural disasters. Moral evil is that which is caused by humans e.g. the holocaust. The problem of evil affects all theistic religions, whose followers must each respond to John Hick's (1922-) question: "Can the presence of evil in the world be reconciled with the existence of a God who is unlimited both in goodness and power?" The logical problem of evil proposes that the idea of world full of suffering created by an omnipotent, omnibenevolent God is a logically inconsistent one. David Hume (1711-76) stated that one of these three propositions must be false. It is impossible to deny that there is evil and suffering in the world, so he claimed that God must be limited either in His power or in His love. ...read more.


For instance, the concept of an uphill slope can exist only alongside the concept of a downhill slope. Without evil, we could not recognise good just as if we lived in world with no darkness, we would not recognise light. However, this isn't a theodicy, but rather process theology. It denies God's ability to create a world of pure goodness which humans could still recognise, and thus qualifies his omnipotent nature. Furthermore, it could be claimed that good and evil are not opposites in the same way that up and down are, and so to compare them would be a disanalogy. Hick points out that causes and physiology of pleasure and pain are work in entirely different ways, and so it is illogical to think of them as opposites. In addition, what is Heaven if not a place devoid of evil? Its inhabitants experience no suffering, and yet still experience pleasure. Leibniz's (1646-1716) theodicy is founded on faith alone. He maintains that due to God's omnipotence and omnibenevolence, this must be the best possible world. The fact that we understand why yet is just part of God's plan. Swinburne (1934-) argues that evil is a means to a greater good. For example, courage and charity couldn't exist without danger and need. He views the balance between good and evil as a moral dimension in which our actions have meaning. He goes so far as even to include the Holocaust in this. In reply to Leibniz and Swinburne, Voltaire (1694-1778) ...read more.


In conclusion, the logical and evidential problems of evil attempt to show atheism as either deductively or inductively rational. Vardy's free will defence responds by claiming that evil is instead a logically necessary. It is a side effect of God allowing us the greatest possible good i.e. the ability to have a genuinely loving relationship with Him. Determinism in turn denies the existence of free will altogether and so points towards atheism. Leibniz however side-steps the logical and evidential problems by maintaining his faith beyond any reason certain to him. This is in keeping with the principle that religion is to an extent, detached from reason. What is certain however, is that all theists must respond to the problem of evil in their own way. Some align with Voltaire in that they cannot reconcile the brutality of their experiences with their faith, finding Augustine's theodicy of a "balance of moral beauty" inadequate. There are many who on the basis of experience alone would refute Swinburne's claim that good and evil are in balance as evil is means to a greater good. Swinburne studied at and conforms to the the school of the Ivory Towers of Oxford. His experiences of evil seem pathetically muted in comparison to Holocaust victims, and so it appears naive for him to make this judgement. However, there are also many in the world who in the face of evil, embrace God all the more. In the grim experience of reality, what use is a critical analysis in comparison the comfort provided by religion? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Christianity section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Christianity essays

  1. Outline the cosmological argument for the existance of God. and plan.

    And this includes the theory of God. Kant refuses to accept God as a satisfactory answer to the universe. Russel describes the universe as a 'brute fact' and says that we have to deal with it. Some people would argue that this is a very immature response to the problem and that to refusing to take the

  2. Life after death and problem of evil

    Furthermore, the theologian Hick would also agree that life after death solves the problem of evil. For Hick we are in a struggle for moral perfection. Evil exists to challenge us to become more like God. Therefore, while evil exists, our ability to face it and overcome it is rewarded by an after life.

  1. RS Evil and Suffering Essay

    When Adam and Eve used their free will and ate from the tree, evil came into the world and we are still suffering its effects now. The world is a fallen world and all we can do is try to use our free will to make the right decisions rather than the wrong ones.

  2. Compare and contrast the key features of Natural Moral Law & Virtue Ethics

    Natural Law's absolutist stance states that certain actions, such as the abuse of the innocent, will always be wrong and therefore is immune to modern flexible morality or cultural relativism. This means that Natural Law upholds values such as human rights, for example, it is never right to torture someone to get information.

  1. The Synoptic Problem

    When talking about friends you do not only write the good. You write the bad also because you just write as you see it, with no bias. This suggests that Marks gospel is the truer and therefore oldest account. Holtzman's two source theory states that Matthew and Luke used Mark

  2. What are the moral and religious differences, if any, between euthanasia and suicide? Why ...

    Interestingly a recent survey has been done which revealed that teenagers spend up to 35 hours a week on the computer but only 35 minutes talking to their parents.16 From the religious point of view there cases would consider to be wrong, Plato stated 'we must not put an end

  1. Reasoned arguments cannot account for the amount of evil in the world. Discuss.

    It is undeniable that the suffering some people experience is simply too extreme and as a result their will is broken. God could have taught them the same lessons but with a lesser degree of pain. Moreover, a truly omnibenevolent God would not test someone beyond his limits.

  2. Gods omniscience and omnibenevolence are compatible. Discuss.

    Thus, God cannot know the future as it has not happened yet- it is thus not logically possible to know it. However, these criticisms do not destroy Boethius? argument- they in fact further support the view that omniscience and omnibenevolence are compatible.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work