• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Belief in life after death is only coherent if we believe in resurrection. Discuss

Extracts from this document...


Belief in life after death is only coherent if we believe in resurrection. Discuss The belief in life after death can only be discussed coherently once you have firstly established the mind-body problem, and secondly identified the problem of personal identity. The mind-body problem questions how the mental and physical aspects of a human being are related, or in other words, how the body and the mind are related. Dualists, such as Descartes, hold that the body and soul are separable and can exist independently. Descartes maintained in his theory of interactionism that since minds and bodies are so metaphysically different, they cannot causally interact with each other, despite being able to exercise their influence on one another. Monists, on the other hand, believe that the body and soul are inseparable and cannot exist without one another. Essentially monists are materialists, holding that the only form of existence is physical and therefore it is not possible to talk about the existence of the soul separate from the body. ...read more.


they have the same memories, aims and personality. On the other hand, believers in resurrection can appeal to both approaches. A person can survive death just by showing some indication of physical continuity with a person who passed before, and it does not matter whether or not there is an additional indication of mental continuity. However, according to Peter Geach, traditional platonic dualists and believers in reincarnation must accept that personal identity is not due to the memory criterion and those differences of memories or of aims can not comprise the difference between two disembodied minds or spirits. This type of spirit feels no pain, has no thoughts and therefore is not physical and has no mind or brain. It is entirely dehumanized. In its disembodied state, only a remnant of a given person survives, just enough to preserve some sort of physical or mental continuity, but not enough to constitute life after death on the basis of memory criterion or to differentiate between it, and that of another. ...read more.


If someone's soul does not unite with its body and come to life by 'resurrection', then only a mental remnant of him survives death, and he does not live. This belief is inline with that of the traditional Christian one. Resurrection is central to the system; it acts as a guarantee that all Christians will be resurrected, and is represented in the depiction of the 'firstfruits' in 1 Corinthians 15:3. Whilst the present body is perishable, weak and dishonourable, the resurrected body is glorious, powerful and immortal. Therefore, to conclude, I would agree with the given contention that belief in life after death is only coherent if we believe in resurrection, despite the problem at first appearing to be a subjective matter. Believers in resurrection can appeal to every solution where the mind-body problem and the problem of personal identity are concerned, and as argued by Peter Geach, even dualists/ believers in reincarnation must return to resurrection to coherently justify life after death. Consequently, in my view, only the possibility of resurrection provides any hope for life after death, ?? ?? ?? ?? Sophie Hicks ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Theories of the resurrection of the body are logically coherent.

    4 star(s)

    Ryle points to the fact that dualism commits a category mistake by separating physical behaviour from mental behaviour. He draws a parallel with the analogy of the foreigner who goes to visit a university and is shown round colleges, laboratories, libraries etc...

  2. Theories of Resurrection of the body are logically coherent - Discuss

    The idea of Hell can also be seen as illogical in the foundations of Christianity; if God is meant to be omniscient and omni-benevolent, then why does he seemingly allow people to enter eternal damnation. Despite this, one could argue that the epistemic 'gap' between humans and God means we're incapable as finite beings of understanding life after death.

  1. Compare and contrast arguments for and against belief in life after death.

    Human beings have a soul or self that is capable of intellectual life. Only humans can reflect on feelings and sensations and grasp 'universals'. In this way we come to understand eternal truths and in doing so we move on to achieve a higher level of existence.

  2. An embodied life in heaven is entirely possible. Discuss.

    This means Christians believe each person will live on this earth once and after that will be judged by God. Whilst Hindu's believe time is intermittent (or cyclical), meaning that they believe people do not live and die once but are able to be reborn a number of times before reaching their final concluding state.

  1. 'A belief in the life after death solves the problem of evil' Discuss

    The idea being that the human race was not created in a state of perfection but in a state of imperfection but leading to a state of perfection. In order for us to develop morally toward God we had to be created and exist at a distance from him, therefore there had to be horrid things in the world.

  2. Assess the view that identity is psychological continuity

    This belief is created by our memories. A second argument in favour of psychological continuity is that it allows for physical change in a way that physical continuity cannot. Our bodies grow and regenerate and may contain different matter over time, our mental faculties provide continuity where matter cannot.

  1. The Concept of Life After Death is Incoherent - Discuss.

    If there is no absolute proof or evidence of an afterlife realm or some kind of existence the argument falls with every question raised.

  2. discuss the claim that any belief in life after death is a theodicy in ...

    Christians claim that in heaven we will be timeless but physical bodies would need food and drink and would perform the normal bodily functions so would we continue to age and eventually grow old or would God somehow restore our youth and enable us to remain forever young?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work