• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Body soul destinction

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'Religious philosophy can offer no firm evidence for a distinction between body and soul.' Discuss. Humans appear to have both a body and a mind, the body which is related to physical movements and appearances. And the mind which relates to feelings and emotions, qualia. Many philosophers therefore make a distinction between the mind and body, the dualist view that a person is made of two separate substances. On the other hand, some philosophers take a monist/ materialist view that the mind and the body are the same substance. This is a contentious area of philosophy, and has created a debate known as "the mind, body problem". Such philosophers as Plato take a dualist view and try to offer evidence to suggest a distinction between the body and soul. Plato saw the body and soul as two separate entities. The soul that most closely resembles the divine and immortal. While the body resembles the human and mortal, which is endlessly changing and can be broken down. Plato was not trying to suggest the soul was perfect as it joined the body which it is inhibited by, however, he explains that by taking care of the soul the person can develop knowledge. Plato used evidence such as the "world of the forms". ...read more.

Middle

For Descartes the mind is I, that we can live without the body as the mind makes us who we are. Descartes took the religious view that after our death the soul is able to continue and be with God. " A man's soul is that to which the pure mental properties of a man belong." Richard Swinburne developed a dualist view based on the soul being indestructible and indivisible. Swinburne suggested that is a logical possibility for a person to exist after the body dies, as the soul lives on. The soul according to Swinburne is linked with mental processes and activity and it's independent from the body. Evidence for Swinburne's theory comes from near death experiences. In many instances people have claimed to have had near death experiences whereby their hearts have stopped during surgery and yet they have reported detailed accounts of what happened during the time they were clinically dead. For some this is evidence for consciousness, however if the body and soul is one entity this would be impossible. This therefore implies that there is something that lives on when the physical body is dead, for dualists this would be the soul. On the other hand although the details of the experiences seem to be accurate there is no proof that the experiences may not be caused by another physical phenomena. ...read more.

Conclusion

We already know only 10% of the brains capacity is used consciously and therefore it is a logical assumption that our mind is located within the brain. An analogy for this is that a woman can be a mother, a daughter and a sister etc. The same person can have many functions, it is therefore the same for the brain which as well as having the functions we already recognise such as controlling physical activity, speaking and controlling bodily functions it can also control the mind. Overall, although religious philosophy offers an explanation for the body soul distinction it is based on little empirical evidence. For those who already follow the religion it may fit in with their beliefs however, for those who are atheist of follow another religion the evidence that it uses makes little logical sense. Such dualists views as Plato where the assumptions are based on everyday life may be more appropriate, however there is still little empirical evidence to prove the theory. On the other hand materialists put fore ward convincing arguments based on scientifically testable theories i.e. Dawkins. But neither arguments yet put enough evidence fore ward to either prove their views or disprove that of others. Therefore the statement Religious philosophy can offer no firm evidence for a distinction between body and soul may be considered as correct, however there is not yet enough evidence to suggest that religious views of dualism cannot be true. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Theories of the resurrection of the body are logically coherent.

    4 star(s)

    the most logical I can safely say that the idea of the resurrection of the body is coherent. However, having rejected the metaphysics behind the concept of life after death the materialist approach also encounters various problems. The materialist approach I have put forward merely argues that it is coherent

  2. Comparison of Plato and Aristotle's views of how knowledge is obtained and the body ...

    The soul tries to gather the two together, rather than allowing them to be pulled apart in opposite directions. Many people never achieve this direction; they allow their lives to be dominated by the bodily needs and pleasures. Philosophers in contrast try to minimise their interests in bodily needs.

  1. Arguments For Property Dualism

    If we answer "yes" to this question, then we have committed ourselves to property dualism. If Mary has exhausted all the physical facts about experiencing colour prior to her going out the room, then her encounter with some new property of colour upon experiencing its Qualia, reveals that there must

  2. How successful are Descartes' arguments for the real distinction of mind from body? Upon ...

    The argument from doubt is I believe the weakest of Descartes arguments a view I think i share with the father of modern philosophy himself "These very things which i am supposing to be nothing, because they are unknown to me, are in reality identical with the I of which i am aware?

  1. Evaluate the claim that the soul is distinct from the body:

    and indeed says ?science has either killed the soul or is in the process of doing so?. However, he does accept the definition of the soul in the Oxford Dictionary, which goes as follows: ?an intellectual power that alludes to the high development of mental faculties, deep feeling and sensitivity

  2. Examine the concepts of immortality of the soul with resurrection of the body - ...

    the same way a soul must escape the physical body when it dies. The body is made up of physical matter and thus will eventually decay, the soul is a non-contingent entity which has an affinity to a higher place Plato describes as the ?realm of forms?.

  1. Evaluate Aristotles view that the soul is mortal and inseparable from the body, making ...

    plants because they have appetites, but humans are above all animals and plants alike because people have the power of reason. If a rationalist was to take Aristotle?s theory at face value, they would find a great deal of difficulty justifying souls being separable from the body, as that would

  2. What makes a person valuable?

    of alienating one another, we should consider everyone a person based on another reason other than this as this is prejudice morally segregation of who are and who aren?t a person. Now I will explain my view on what I think makes a person, a ?person?.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work