• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Capital Punishment - analyse the views of Ernest van den Haag and Hugo Adam Bedau,

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Marisol Torres Capital Punishment: Ernest van den Haag and Hugo Adam Bedau As a society we have an established set of rules and norms that are enforced by our justice system which we as a people have deemed as the highest power to determine when these rules and norms are broken and what appropriate punishment should be given. We live in a world filled with diversity. Not only diversity in cultures but diversity with people in terms of character and morals. Society is filled with both good upstanding people but also those people who find it less than necessary to follow any norms or rules society has created but instead find a life in crime. Crimes can range from something minimal such as theft to the most serious which is murder. This introduces us to capital punishment or more commonly termed, the death penalty. Though openly controversial, capital punishment has its share of opponents and supporters. Many philosophers have discussed issues in relation to violence, laws and punishment. Malcolm X is one such philosopher. His beliefs in violence in terms of self defense can relate to the issue of capital punishment. Malcolm X believed that one should defend themselves by all means necessary when it means self defense. He believed in non violence unless one?s life was at risk and needed defending. In such cases self defense should be practiced. ...read more.


Therefore Haag uses the lives of future innocent victims as the advantage of capital punishment whereas Bedau though agreeing with Haag about the possibility of executing innocent people, identifies the risks as ?social costs? (pg. 367). Bedau proceeds to discuss the economic costs that the death penalty incurs. Cost of housing the prisoner while on death row, cost of the capital trial and of the appeals. Bedau discusses the risk of executing innocent people just as Haag but Bedau finds different aspects of it to elaborate and approaches the matter in terms of costs to society. Haag makes two points in regards to deterrence for which Bedau has an argument he presents. According to Haag, capital punishment deters other criminals from committing murder and per the Ehrlich study 1 execution saves 7 or 8 innocent lives and not executing the murderer is a form of irresponsibility when the only reason is that there is no guarantee that their execution will lengthen or save future innocent victims who would be murdered had the murderer be spared. Bedau argues that capital punishment cannot deter murder but instead it can possibly only prevent it. Bedau draws a distinction between the death penalty as a crime preventive and death penalty as a crime deterrent. Haag does not make a distinction and instead only discusses the death penalty as a crime deterrent. It is only reasonable that the distinction be made. ...read more.


This approach will of course never happen so I will offer a different one. Considering that it is argued that capital punishment is unfairly applied and that an accused murderer?s innocence or guilt is determined based on how much funds they have to afford good counsel and appeals then as a way to eliminate this risk every single person who si accused of murder should have the best counsel available to them regardless of whether they can afford it or not. This will allow every single person to get a fair trial and the possibility of executing someone who is actually innocent will no longer exist. A person will no longer be executed with the possible doubt that they may be innocent but just could not afford to be defended fairly. If someone murderers another human being then they should be punished just as severely, but also until their guilt is proven they should be defended like anyone else, regardless of how much money they have. Innocence and guilt should never have a price tag. Capital punishment is our society?s way of keeping moral boundaries and norms in place. We as a people can have different opinions about the severity of the death penalty but that is all they are, opinions. Whether we agree with the death penalty or oppose it we must learn to recognize other points of views and educate ourselves. Murder is the most severe of crimes and the death penalty is the most severe of punishments. Therefore, each one of us has a choice to decide whether they go hand in hand. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Consider the arguments for and against paid organ donation.

    These factors would make it impossible to be able to value an organ without creating protest and controversy. Many religions would protest, as would ethicists and philosophers, until there became a unifying agreement about how valuable body parts are, and this will not happen because we cannot prove or disprove these religious theories about valuing organs.

  2. Essay on Law vs. Justice

    Recent scandals' involving some of the best known companies in the world (Enron, World Com) raises concerns about trust and corporate integrity. Corporate ethical challenges are not new and many would argue that the level of ethics practiced in the corporate world cycles up and down over time.

  1. Utilitarianism is unjust

    He points out the fact that it would only be true if spending our lives in the machine would maximize our satisfaction, and continues with the belief that it would indeed do so. However, the problem with his argument is that living inside an experience machine would not necessarily produce the most satisfaction.

  2. Arguing against the death penalty. Truly there is no purpose to the Death Penalty ...

    How can this be? All the teachings of Christ, save for those which have been horribly twisted by his followers, are opposed to any form of criminal justice. It seems that the modern Christian has begun to accept only those teachings which feel convenient.

  1. Should capital punishment be reinstated?

    Anti-capital punishment campaigners in the U.S. believe that it costs more to execute someone rather than having someone in prison for life, but this, whilst true for America, has to do with the endless appeals and delays in carrying out death sentences that are allowed under the U.S.

  2. The only punishment that can achieve justice is retribution DISCUSS

    This absolute pretty much out rules capital punishment, which means that if the retribution was taken as 'eye for an eye' sort of thing, murderers could not be punished by being killed themselves. The punishment that is 'deserved' is hard to distinguish as some people will be more against certain

  1. Assess whether an unequal distribution of property between individuals could be a feature of ...

    Even if one does not buy this argument, Rawls claimed that injustice in the distribution of property in society can work to the advantage to the poorest in society ? via a welfare state etc. Rawls invented the ?veil of ignorance? to prove in the ?original position? what justice should be.

  2. DNA and capital punishment

    A confession by the defendant is not a dependable indicator of guilt. Manipulation and pressure by the police and the presence of mental retardation or mental illness on the part of the defendant can lead an innocent suspect to be overly cooperative with the authorities by supplying information the police

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work