• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Clarify the key features of a deontological theory of ethics - To what extent if any, do the weaknesses outweigh the strengths of this theory?

Extracts from this document...


Clarify the Key Features of a Deontological Theory of Ethics. To what Extent if any, do the Weaknesses Outweigh the Strengths of this Theory? Claudia Bicen Kant's (1724-1804) Moral Law is a deontological theory of ethics based around the concept of duty and reason. Kant highlights the importance man's rational capacity and ability to think logically and separately from his own circumstances or preferences that distinguishes him from other creatures. This idea is expressed in Kant's greatest works, the Critique of Pure Reason (1781) and the Critique of Practical Reason (1788). Kant maintains that reason binds man to man since reason is an innate intellectual power which exists more or less equally in all men. Thus, such reason enables the individual to resolve his own problems in a way possibly acceptable to everyone. Kant argues that by using reason, one can find the answers to moral dilemmas that are right for everyone. Furthermore, Kant's moral Law is independent of God, i.e. a secular ethic. Kant defines the following words; 'analytic' as a statement where the predicate is included in the subject, thus necessarily true; 'a priori' where the truth is known independent of experience; 'synthetic' as a statement where the predicate is not including in the statement and 'a posteriori' where the truth is based on experience. ...read more.


Thus Kant would see it as immoral to be friends with someone for own rewards and selfishness. The third definition is similar to that of the first. The formula of the kingdom of ends affirms 'so act as if you were through your maxims a law making member of a kingdom of ends'. This last definition refers to self discipline and responsible behaviour because true good some from inside and acting upon it. From these definitions it can be concluded that there is great emphasis on universalisability. Kant maintains that to test if an action is moral it must be able to be applied consistently and logically to the rest of the world. The importance of Kant's moral law has increased rather than weakened with the years because without doubt various features of the theory remain attractive. Most importantly one must note the theory's ability to take good account of justice. It manages to be able to correct the utilitarian viewpoint that punishment of the innocent can be justified due to majority benefit, because the moral worth of an action comes from the intrinsic rightness of an action justice of the individual is safeguarded by the universal and objective character of the categorical imperative which obliges duties upon us all. ...read more.


What Kant appears to overlooks his problem in exclusion of exceptions. In Kant's contradictions in nature he maintains that telling lies and breaking promises are always wrong because they can never be consistently universalised, thus one can never lie or break a promise with no exceptions. However there are examples when such concepts can lead to serious dilemmas when duties conflict. Consider that one promises a friend that they will hide them from a murderer and later the murderer asks where they have hidden the friend. To tell the truth would be to break a promise, but to keep the promise is to lie. Kant's moral law provides us with no answer to such dilemma and therefore the theory is weakened because it fails to help us in every situation. Therefore in conclusion, clearly there are valid strengths and weaknesses of Kant's moral law. However I feel that the strengths outweigh the limitations of this theory. Such idea is clearly reflected in the fact that Kant's theory has become increasingly popular and accepted over the years. This has to show how successful Kant's ideas are even though they have been faced with criticism. However, one can ask themselves if there could be any moral law without weaknesses. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Analyse and explain the strengths and weaknesses of deontology

    This view may be argued to be guilty of GE Moore's naturalistic fallacy ; just because something is the case or because human nature is a certain way, does not give moral justification to such a state of affairs. It is not obvious, apart from intuitively, why we should not divorce emotion from moral decisions.

  2. Examine the key features of utilitarianism and its strengths and weaknesses of utilitarianism

    Although it has the benefit of being the most flexible, one problem of this is that the means may cause terrible suffering and anguish for many people but if the result is a good one then the actions are still, supposedly, morally good.

  1. Essay on Law vs. Justice

    That simple adjustment greatly overstated income because expenditures for capital assets are spread over the life of the asset instead of being deducted 100% from income right away. Sure, future reported income would be substantially reduced in the long run, but WorldCom management figured that, in the long run, they would not be around and probably all dead.

  2. Compare Utilitarianism With Kant's Theory of The Categorical Imperative And Explain Which You Think ...

    As well as providing justification for actions that break laws, and could thus cause chaos, Utilitarianism leaves individuals vulnerable. Such as with the example of Jim, it defends the sacrifice of one in order to benefit the majority - but who decides whom the individual is?

  1. Utilitarianism VS Kantian Deontological Ethics

    even if they do not result in bad acts. Once this is recognised, it can be argued that utilitarianism becomes a much more complex and rich moral theory, and may align much more closely with our moral intuitions. Intentions are addressed much more seriously in deontological ethics, reflected in Kant's opinion that "the aim of life is not to achieve happiness, but to deserve it".

  2. A) Clarify the key features of a deontological theory of ethics

    In essence, he believed he had created an autonomous method of working out universal moral rules. To clarify how we know which actions are good and which are not, Kant indicated two imperatives, the hypothetical imperative and the categorical imperative.

  1. Identify the distinctive characteristics of situation ethics. ii.) Consider the view that situation ...

    John Robinson, who was the Bishop of Woolwich, threw the Church into turmoil by arguing that Christianity needed to embrace the ?new morality? and that the only law in Ethics should be ?the law of love?. Robinson was in support of Situation Ethics and wanted to attempt applying a Christian moral view to changing society.

  2. The Main Features of Justice, Law and Punishment

    One person being punished could prevent others committing the same crime. Reform is concerned with changing the offender?s viewpoint or circumstances so that they will not reoffend. Prisons offer educational programmes. Protection is another type of punishment, to lock up someone in prison in order to protect the rest of society from their actions.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work