• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Compare and contrast proof and probability. (10 marks)

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

﻿Compare and contrast proof and probability. (10 marks) Proof derives from a priori grounds which are deductive. A priori is based on solid facts and logic so there is only one possible conclusion. ?An argument which starts from one or more premises, which are prepositions taken for granted for the purpose of the argument, and argues to a conclusion? (Swinburne). In mathematics and logic, a statement is proven if it cannot be proven to be false. For example, 1+1=2 cannot be incorrect as it abides the laws of mathematics. ...read more.

Middle

A posteriori relies on our senses rather than on facts which causes there to be many possible conclusions; the most probable answer is taken as the conclusion. The inductivity of a posteriori arguments always leaves a door for doubt and uncertainty. Probability measures the likelihood of a conclusion to be true; the most probable answer however is not the only conclusion. A problem with proofs is the dependence of limited human experiences and resources. As a priori relies on logical reasoning, there is an area exposed to flaws since the human reasoning may be inadequate or limited in knowledge. ...read more.

Conclusion

features of human experience? (Swinburne). Furthermore, there may be an alternative conclusion which is just as convincing as the other; the conclusion chosen is based on the person?s opinion. An advantage of a priori arguments is that they are appealing to logic and reason and so is understood better. The ontological argument sets out to prove that it is logically impossible to believe in the non-existence of god, using factual premises in order for the conclusion to be deductive. Although a posterior arguments are not deductive, they are convincing because they can be experienced which may be factual for some people. The cosmological and teleological arguments are a posteriori arguments therefore the conclusions are inductive and rely on probability. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

1. ## Compare and contrast arguments for and against belief in life after death.

The individual atoms of which we are composed would differ to those of our copy. We are contingent beings and given that there must be some gap in time in between us ceasing to be and our replica coming to be, then surely it cannot be the same person.

2. ## Moot-court Reflective Report.

could emphasise why this would mean that in the case that we were arguing, Jennifer was denied the right to a fair trial. Before concluding my argument, I then prepared a brief summary of the points that I was raising, so they would be fresh in the moot judges mind, so then I could formally conclude my argument.

1. ## Fathers and Sons - The Quarrel &amp;amp;#150; Chapter 10 .

without the principals that aristocrats preach; he is directly implying that Bazarov is ignorant and stupid. This argument I feel was more of a personal statement made towards Bazarov rather than a good argument to debate over, however Bazarov retains his dignity and moves to another topic, naming a few words used in aristocracy and labeling them as utter nonsense.

2. ## Outline the teleological proof of the existence of God

He explains that this motor is used to propel the bacterium forward and has about 50 different tiny parts to it and if one of these tiny parts were to be removed then the motor would cease to work. Professor Dembski would say about this that there must therefore be

• Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to