• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and Contrast the Cosmological and Ontological Arguments.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and Contrast the Cosmological and Ontological Arguments "Why do I exist? What created the universe? Does God exist?" Questions which have challenged philosophers for many years. The Cosmological and Ontological arguments attempt to answer these questions. Through this essay I hope to explore the methodology and formation of the arguments in their early stages, and their development through the years. I will also explore the extension of the arguments in the modern era, for both supporters and critics of the arguments. The modern era provides a wide range of developments to the arguments, and I will explore the ideas and thoughts of many 20Th Century philosophers. At the core of this essay is the two very different approaches of the arguments, the a posteriori based Cosmological, and the a priori based Ontological 1. ...read more.

Middle

The basis of the argument itself depends on ones understanding of the nature of God. The argument attempts to prove Gods expistence through the meaning of the word GOD. The Cosmological argument on the other hand, is a a posteriori based argument. They argue that the truth of a proposition may only be known to be true after empirical knowledge is utilised to prove the statement true or false. 2 The two arguments were both first begun by the classical Greek Philosophers Aristotle and Plato. Plato argued one of the Cosmological arguments earliest forms. He argued that "the power to produce movement logically comes before the power to receive it and pass it on"3 This basically means that if there if movement, then something has to have caused this. ...read more.

Conclusion

So both arguments take with them the ideas and concepts of classic Greek philosophers, albeit in very differing ways. The ontological argument attempts to suggest the existence of there being a creator, or God. There are two main contributors to the Classical Ontological argument for the existence of God. These were St Anselm and Descartes. The main creators of the Cosmological were Aquinas and Leibniz. 1 Though David Hume believed that the Cosmological was an a priori based argument. General consensus has decided that he was wrong in this assumption. 2 This can be used to prove that a statement COULD be true. If a statement cannot be proved to be false then it has a possibility of being true. (this is important to the Cosmological Argument) 3 Extract from Jordan,Lockyer,Tate Philosophy of Religion For A Level ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Compare and contrast arguments for and against belief in life after death.

    Some critics have suggested that this does not explain all mental behaviour. If we are for example wishing for something, this does not mean we are behaving in a particular way. You could counter this by saying that the number of subconscious thoughts we have are numerous, and they often

  2. Compare and Contrast the Philisophical Contributions of Nietzsche and Mill to our understanding of ...

    The new philosophers or "noble breed" will possess the "master morality" the morality of the aristocratic, that which makes values for others and sees itself as noble. At this point, Nietzsche introduces the 'notion of superiority' - the idea that these "free spirits" or new philosophers will assume a place

  1. Leaving home - a corrected essay.

    without feeling obligated to his or her state, but the choice is still difficult to make. When loyalty is questioned, one becomes very pessimistic of his or her own conclusions, as loyalty is a feeling that is not reasoned, but is not irrational.

  2. Comapring Aristotle's Prime Mover and the Judeo-Christian God

    Considering that many Christians and Jews do not take the creation story to be literally true, the creator part of God is not what is important to them, and therefore they serve very different purposes for the people who believe in them and so I think that they are very different from each other.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work