• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast the ethical theories of natural law and situation ethics.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and contrast the ethical theories of natural law and situation ethics. There are two main approaches to ethics which are held by Christians today. Over the years it has proved to be a very controversial and widely debated issue. Catholics and certain other 'strict' denominations of the Christian church hold the view that natural law should be the means of making ethical decisions, whereas more liberal Christians consider situation ethics as a more suitable ethical system to go by. Natural law was advocated by St Thomas Aquinas in the thirteenth century. It states that all ethical decisions should be made by looking at the absolute moral laws which have been laid down for us by God. For Christians these stem from The Ten Commandments. Believers in this are known as Ethical Deontologists. They maintain that an action is intrinsically good, bad, right or wrong. When faced with a moral dilemma, one should refer to the Law, irrespectively of what the outcome will be. It is suggested that the human purpose of life is to live and reproduce, to live harmoniously, to learn and to worship God. ...read more.

Middle

Actions are good if they help human beings and they are bad if they hurt people - there are no other criteria. What is right in one case may be wrong in another. The individual and the situation are the only important thing when making a decision, rather than applying a principle (for example 'thou shalt not kill'). The following quotations help to summarise situation ethics, "There is only one ultimate and invariable duty, and its formula is 'Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself'. How to do this is another question, but this is the whole of moral duty." (William Temple)... "The law of love is the ultimate law because it is the negation of law; it is absolute because it concerns everything concrete...the absolutism of love is its power to go into concrete situations." (Paul Tillich) Even though the teleological approach is a relative theory of ethics, it still involves an absolute law which is to do everything in love. However, the relativity of this theory allows room for exceptions to rules. Relativism doesn't imply that anything goes. ...read more.

Conclusion

Bishop John Robinson once wrote, 'There is no one ethical system that can claim to be Christian' and I completely agree with that. A supporter of the natural law approach asks what the law says and the situationist asks what is the best decision to help human beings, but why can't there be a middle ground? We should be able to use what was once the Law as a guideline when making ethical decisions rather than sticking rigidly to one approach just for the sake of theological argument. The Pope believes that the Law is 'God's revealed will' but it could be said that God revealed his will most fully through Jesus' time on Earth. Not only did He preach on the importance of love, but He also showed us perfect examples of it throughout His life. It is the subtle difference between these doctrines that lies at the heart of many issues which are in hot debate at the moment. If the Church could ignore these theological ambiguities and become reunited, perhaps they could then learn to fulfill their purpose in Christ. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Explain the main ethical principle of Christianity.

    It is the same with the example with Hitler. If a man kills Hitler, it would not be considered wrong by both utilitarianism and situation ethics. By killing Hitler, you would be doing the most loving thing as you would be killing the person who caused and would probably have continued to have brought suffering to hundreds of thousands

  2. Examine the key features of situation ethics, and the main criticisms of it, and ...

    that the most important commandment is to love God and love your neighbour. Hr also said that love and justice are the same, and love is justice distributed, that love is not liking and always wills the neighbour's good and that situation ethics is a teleological theory that identifies the

  1. Essay on Law vs. Justice

    we can also de-program our current corporations of executives, lawyers, and accountants. While the President and Congress would have us scare them into telling the truth, we think the problem will be resolved more quickly and completely with a simple two-step approach.

  2. Explain the importance of good will in Kant's ethical theory.

    If euthanasia were good, it should be the duty of everyone, at least everyone in that situation. But euthanasia can not be a universal duty, and therefore, it can not be a good duty, and therefore, lacks moral value. Kant says that actions should be based on what is good.

  1. Compare and contrast the application of two ethical theories to a moral dilemma. Discuss ...

    Kant wanted to give this belief philosophical justification. In the case of the Utilitarian the action is decided upon what the consequences would be whereas the Kantian would consider the nature of the actions and the will of the agents.

  2. Describe and explain the distinctive features of 'natural law' and 'situation ethics'.

    For example, donating money to charity is a good exterior act, but if given with the wrong intention, it has a bad interior intention, making it an immoral act. However, the reverse is not true: a good interior intention cannot justify an immoral outward act.

  1. Evaluate the claim that conscience is a reliable guide to ethical decision making.

    Without the divinity attributed to conscience by Aquinas and Newman, and the recognition that reason is fallible, the prescription that we should follow conscience absolutely seems reminiscent of the General's pronouncement that 'While we accept that your weather reports are no better than random guesswork, we would like you to

  2. Religious Studies - Ethics: Natural Moral Law

    Aquinas presented the idea of efficient and final causes; the efficient cause being what gets something done and the final cause being the end product, for example, an efficient cause could be sexual intercourse and the final cause would be a baby.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work