• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast the immortality of the soul and the resurrection of the body. To what extent is one of these a more convincing position than the other?

Extracts from this document...


Compare and contrast the immortality of the soul and the resurrection of the body. To what extent is one of these a more convincing position than the other? 40 marks There are many different ideas to what happens to the body after death, two of these ideas are the immortality of the soul and the resurrection of the body; both of these are valid ideas and there are different philosophers who agree with both of these perspectives. The idea of resurrection began to appear in the ancient world, but there were other theories which were arising such as in the 4th Century Plato was teaching that the soul would survive after death. Resurrection (from the Latin resurrectus) is believed in by Muslims, Jews and Christians, the idea is that God will raise the dead back to life at the end of time and then they will be judged, the righteous and the good will form an eternal Kingdom of God (heaven in the Christian teachings) and then the sinners would be excluded. Therefore the idea of resurrection suggests that this life is the testing ground for the next life. Although Christianity, Islam and Judaism all believe in resurrection, they all have their different interpretations of the idea. ...read more.


Thirdly Plato believed that the body has an affinity with the earth and that the soul has an affinity with the eternal realm of forms, this is because the body is a composite and then at death it is dispersed to the earth. Since the soul is simple it can not be dispersed at death and therefore it returns to the realm of forms where it had an affinity. Finally Plato suggests that since the soul is simple and it can not be destroyed then when death occurs it must be destroyed or retreat, the soul is unable to be destroyed and so it has to retreat and it goes into the realm of the forms. These four arguments which were suggested by Plato were created deductively and therefore they do not rely on empirical and this is the main weakness of the argument. Ren? Descartes argues that the existence of the true self can be known through reason, in his book Mediations, he attempts to prove his existence through his argument "I think, therefore I am" (cogito ergo sum). Descartes believes that this is therefore proof of humans as thinking beings, he suggests that we are "thinking things" (res cognitans), this means that knowledge is separate from the body. ...read more.


idea, especially if someone has a terminal illness it would not just be comforting to the suffer, but also to the family if they believe that their soul is immortal. Also some religious experiences, such as near death experiences, people's testimonies may support this concept. Some testimonies suggest that they look down on their body; therefore this is evidence that the soul is separate from the body. Although there are strengths to the immortality of the soul argument, it does suffer from some significant weaknesses; the idea that the body is separate from the soul could be seen as unnecessary and unscientific as Ryle pointed out. Also this idea lacks a basis in traditional religious teachings, therefore Jews and Christians should be seen to reject it, because resurrection is a key feature of the Christian traditions. In conclusion, both the immortality of the soul and resurrection of the body are convincing positions, but to some extent, the immortality of the soul is more a convincing idea, this is because although resurrection does play a major role in the bible, Plato, Kant and Descartes all give convincing arguments to dualism. Also resurrection does have major weaknesses, because it is less verifiable than the immortality of the soul, there are many accounts of near death experiences and out of body experiences. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Theories of the resurrection of the body are logically coherent.

    4 star(s)

    Hick's theory avoids disrupting personal continuity and is, generally speaking, coherent as a whole. However, I would strongly argue against it on the basis that it depends on far too many hypothetical preconditions, such as: that God exists, that there can be another world, and, more importantly, given that such

  2. Theories of Resurrection of the body are logically coherent - Discuss

    Flew says how people are what you meet, a combination of body and mind unification, and it's 'self-contradictory' to refer to someone by name after death - it makes no sense. This is similar to what Aristotle wrote; he wrote how the soul gives the body 'activity', taking a biological approach to the unification.

  1. Body soul destinction

    claims to be Jesus appears to be unrecognisable implying he has a different physical appearance. For Christians this will act as firm evidence that there is a body soul distinction, however for those who are not Christian the evidence may not be so reliable.

  2. Compare and contrast the contributions of Descartes and Humes on the issue of the ...

    Likewise perfection can't be ascribed. An example would be that from footprints in the sand one could infer that a person has walked here, however you could not infer that the person was wearing a Walkman just from the footprints. It is impossible to tell whether this system has faults and even if it was

  1. Compare and contrast arguments for and against belief in life after death.

    Williams argues that memories are not a good guide to identity. Memories and personality can be fabricated and personal identity cannot be proved through mental activity alone. He believed that identity comes from physical characteristics as well. Personal identity depends on the way in which we recognise each other and without our bodies we cannot be fully identified.

  2. Explain Plato's and Aristotle's ideas of form, body, knowledge and soul.

    Just as Plato had, Aristotle faced the problem of identifying continuity of being (essence) in an ever-changing world. Plato considered the physical realm to be less than perfect (it was always changing), which is why he located perfection elsewhere. However Aristotle believed the physical realm was not imperfect so he looked for explanations around him.

  1. Comparison of Plato and Aristotle's views of how knowledge is obtained and the body ...

    And the fourth cause is 'the final cause'; this is the most important of all causes. It is that all objects have an ultimate reason for existing. E.g. the painting's existence may be to create a beautiful, decorative object for people to admire and enjoy.

  2. Evaluate the claim that the soul is distinct from the body:

    of a person.? A lot of psychologists agree with the position that Dawkins hold and argue that the soul is nothing more than a human fantasy brought about through fear of death.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work