• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare hard determinism and Libertarianism.

Extracts from this document...


Compare hard determinism and Libertarianism. However this theory of environment and genetics alone effecting our actions is contradicted by Libertarianism. In presenting their argument Libertarians often distinguish between a persons formed character or personality and his of hers moral self. Personality, according to libertarianism, is an empirical concept, capable of explanation and prediction and known through observation. The personality formed by genetics and environment limits the choice we have and makes us more likely to choose certain actions. This would back up the idea stated by hard determinists. However libertarianism goes on to state that however likely an action sated by genetic and environment it is not inevitable, it is possible for the moral self to counteract this. This then goes against hard determinism because in other words it is saying that even if your circumstance of genetic make up and environment go against you in your personality encouraging you to take certain actions, they can be overridden by the persons moral self. ...read more.


If heredity and environment affect my personality why is my moral attitude not shaped in the same way. The libertarianism assumes the existence of free will in moral choice but has provided no evidence for it. The libertarian reply is made up of 3 separate arguments. The first is an appeal to facts of experience, we all have the experience of being self-determining, this is present is everyday decisions, do I drink coffee or tea? it is common to all. In these we do not feel any difficulty choosing, and people whose choices are sometimes restricted (alcoholic) can still compare these situations with these they have no control, they recognize there limits but have sufficient other experience to believe free will exists. The second concerns on analysis of the way we make decisions, the act of decision making. ...read more.


In the same way, the evidence of decision-making can deceive us into believing that free will exists. The libertarian's third argument is designed to meet this objection, and it employs an important philosophical distinction. This is a distinction between two kinds of knowledge and, accordingly, between two kinds of truths which may be known to be true or false. "you cannot simultaneously be in the room and out of it" this statement is said to be necessarily true. This is because they could not possibly be false and because their truth is established independently of sense experience. " The table is brown" this statement is contingently true because these are verified by sense experiences and because they may conceivably be false. From this we conclude that, in our observation of the world around us, it is impossible to achieve complete knowledge; that, in the world of contingent events, the possible of error always exists. Gavin Huggett ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. "It is impossible to reconcile any kind of determinism with the concept of freewill." ...

    There seems to be a private sphere in our introspection, in which we cannot make mistakes. For example, you cannot be wrong about the fact that you are in pain when you actually are in pain. Who can tell but you?

  2. Business environment

    Business ethics are the key to profits. The issue of effectively integrating ethics into business decision making is a major area of debate confronting today's corporate leaders. Persistent media reports of unethical behavior by corporations, business executives, and governmental officials highlight the need for effective solutions to the ethics dilemma.

  1. Why is the distinction between Knowledge & Belief so important in Philosophy?

    For example, you see someone walking down the street and think it is your friend and wave only to discover it was someone entirely different. We believed our senses but they were mistaken.

  2. Assess the claim that Free Will and Determinism are compatible

    The victim acts spontaneously - they may decide to fight or to run away. The decision is theirs to make, but whatever they decide is not done by chance. It is a calculated decision. Hume and Locke uphold the notion that we can observe patterns in the physical world that

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work