• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically Assess the Claim That the Religious Believer Dies a Death of a Thousand Qualifications

Extracts from this document...


?Critically Assess the Claim That the Religious Believer Dies a Death of a Thousand Qualifications? The claim that ?the religious believer dies the death of a thousand qualifications? is one made by British Philosopher Anthony Flew. The meaning behind this statement is essentially that through constant qualification and amendment of the claim ?God?s exists?, by religious believers, it ultimately becomes meaningless because there is no way to falsify it. Flew illustrates his view by making use of John Wisdom?s parable of the gardener. He uses this parable and adapts it, to make an attack on the meaningfulness of religious language. In Flew?s adaption of the parable, two people spend some days in a garden. Unlike in Wisdom?s version of the parable, Flew?s sceptic (who doesn?t see any evidence of a gardener) views the claim that there is a gardener as a hypothesis that needs to be tested. Since they don?t see the gardener visiting the garden, the sceptic reckons there probably isn?t a gardener. However, his companion suggests that the gardener must come at night instead. So the two of the stay up all night keeping watch, however no gardener is spotted. Again the sceptic takes this as proof there isn?t a gardener. However, the believer then suggests that the gardener must be invisible. ...read more.


Therefore in that view, the religious believer does die the death of a thousand qualifications. Richard Hare responds to Flew by producing a parable of his own, known as the parable of the paranoid student. Similar to the person who believes in the invisible gardener, the paranoid student cannot imagine being incorrect. His claim ?my teachers are out to get me? is unfalsifiable. This view that the student keeps is called a blik. A blik is a belief that cannot be changed no matter what. However, Hare argues that this belief still remains meaningful, because it has an actual influence on how the student views the world, how he forms other beliefs, and how he lives his life. Although the statement operates very importantly within the students belief system, so that it cannot be falsified, and all the evidence is warped to fit with this belief; the very centrality of the belief means it?s very meaningful. This view is opposite to what Flew argued. Hence, Hare is arguing that it is possible to agree to a statement that is not falsifiable but which is none the less meaningful. According to Hare we all share some qualities with the paranoid student because most of us have fundamental beliefs or principles on which we base our actions on, and which we will never give up. ...read more.


Mitchell?s parable reflects the doubt that religious believers sometimes have when they encounter particular sufferings in life. Mitchell believes that these ?trials of faith? show that Flew is wrong to think that believers simply deny all evidence that goes against their beliefs. I think that Mitchell?s response is quite good because it seems the better example as to how life would be like for a religious person. There will be moments of doubts, but the idea of religion is to keep the faith. Mitchell?s parable also shows that belief can be falsifiable because of the facts that you might have doubts and hence there will be circumstances where you might give up your belief. In conclusion, I don?t think that religious believers ?die a death of a thousand qualifications? because although religious believers might make many qualifications to the statement ?God exists?, according to Flew the believers are essentially disregarding the evidence. However, I think Mitchell?s view is better because the idea that religious believers sometimes do have doubts is more plausible, but they normally still keep the faith. Yet, this also shows that the belief is falsifiable because you can imagine circumstances where you would give up your belief. Therefore since it isn?t completely unfalsifiable and unverifiable, then it isn?t meaningless either. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Compare and contrast arguments for and against belief in life after death.

    Unfortunately however this is not cohesive with creation theory. The theory also does not take into account personal development, if we are resurrected as a younger person of ourselves then it ignores part of what it is to be human - the ability to develop and change in order to achieve self-actualisation.

  2. "Religious Language is meaningless." Discuss.

    are used, for example in talking about one's love for a partner. This love would not be appropriate for talking about God because it would make God too human. Human love is fickle and we fall out of love with one another.

  1. Deontology has many strengths but it is justifiable to reject it. Clarify and assess ...

    Kantian ethics replaces the idea of God with the idea of rationality. Firmly based in reason, the theory argues that we can derive moral laws from rational precepts. According to Kant, anyone who behaves immorally is also acting irrationally. Kant formulated the Categorical Imperative, which in many ways resembles the

  2. Assess the claim 'Our lives are determined'

    A seemingly better working idea would be that of predestination. Predestination is similar to fatalism in the respect that our futures are known. However it leaves room for free will. Typically a religious view on determinism, predestination is the belief that we have taken an action because God knew that we were going to do it.

  1. Philosophy: Life After Death Analysis

    Unfortunately for Ryle he was speaking shortly after a very bloody war, to a nation who had just lost many loved ones, who were not really all too willing to accept they had simply been thrust into oblivion by the Nazi war machine.

  2. Critically assess the claim that religious language is meaningless.

    It is not a question of whether the statements are right or wrong but whether they are meaningful or not. Ayer admitted that a distinction between practical verifiability and verifiability in principle. There were many things which were meaningful at the time Ayer was writing but which had not been absolutely verified e.g.

  1. discuss the claim that any belief in life after death is a theodicy in ...

    Christians claim that in heaven we will be timeless but physical bodies would need food and drink and would perform the normal bodily functions so would we continue to age and eventually grow old or would God somehow restore our youth and enable us to remain forever young?

  2. How Can the Religious View Be Defended As a Way of Seeing the World?

    So it is only through observation of the way in which an object like a watch, for example, is produced in our world, that we understand that they require a designer. But if we never had any experience of its manufacture or design, then we would never be able to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work