• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Defenders of situation ethics would argue that one of its key strengths is its flexibility; it allows for pragmatic decisions to be made where rule-based ethical systems follow their own absolute commandments.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

(ii) How far do the weaknesses lead to a rejection of the theory? 9 marks Defenders of situation ethics would argue that one of its key strengths is its flexibility; it allows for pragmatic decisions to be made where rule-based ethical systems follow their own absolute commandments. It takes the circumstances into account where they ignore them, disallowing some actions 'whatever the circumstances.' The frequent attempts to sidestep them are a tacit acknowledgment that this is the case, and can lead to some very confused situations. For example, the removal of the Fallopian tube, with its indirect result of the death of a foetus which would otherwise cause the mother's death, is ...read more.

Middle

This is a gut reaction, not in itself a reason for saying that killing is automatically wrong any more than the fact that some people are instinctively racist shows that racism is right. Its supporters would also claim that situation ethics focuses on humans rather than what amounts to a worship of laws and abstract principles. These only have ultimate value to the extent that they help people. The argument is that the only basis for something being morally good can be the resulting feelings of human beings, and situationalists like Joseph Fletcher have argued that because Christianity's God is a personal one, its moral approach should be centred around human beings too. ...read more.

Conclusion

Also, it is often very hard for someone to individually judge what is loving, as they are bound to see things from their perspective. Some selfishness can easily creep in with no firm rules, and love can also lead to favouritism. But a strong argument against situation ethics is that it tends to assume that just because an act is well motivated, it is automatically right. This is clearly not the case. Just because you wouldn't blame someone who accidentally killed two kids while trying to save his neighbour's dog, doesn't mean that his action was, with hindsight, objectively right. It could be argued that the motives did not love. ?? ?? ?? ?? Kerrie Freeman ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

3/5

The essay lands a couple of good points in favour of situation ethics. Nevertheless, it is held back by the absence of a clear conclusion, and indeed, argument in general, that addresses the question. Given the question, a little more focus on the weaknesses of the approach would be good here, even if it is ultimately argued that they do not overcome its strengths. While good points are made pro and con situation ethics more consideration is needed in terms of weighing these up, rather than just listing them.

Marked by teacher David Moss 31/03/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Give an account of Kant's ethics

    3 star(s)

    To make a rule universal one must be able to put themselves into the positions of others meaning that the person who is about to carry out a certain act must not do so unless he/she is certain that all others in the same situation should carry out that specific act in the same manner.

  2. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    For must not the cause of existing things exist? We find ourselves faced with the possibility of an infinite regress. If it is true of A that it is caused to exist by B, why may not B be caused to exist by C,D,E...and so on ad infinitum?

  1. Analyze the distinctive features of the Ontological Argument

    He defined God as a 'Supreme perfect being' which possess all perfections. This perfect state must include existence. Descartes believed we can conclude that God exists because existence is a predicate of a perfect being; therefore God must exist to avoid being self-contradictory.

  2. "All Religious Language is meaningless"

    to convey ideals and that which cannot be expressed using straight language. It is not the literal myth which is significant it is the message, or meaning behind it.Yet there is still a problem here, we still arrive at the same problem; symbol and myth mean different things to different people.

  1. Ontological Argument - Edexcel A2

    The problem is, is that there is no way to get rid of the 'if'". To what extent, if any, is this argument a proof for the existence of God? (14 marks. Although it has been around for hundreds of years, it would not be fair to say that the Ontological Argument is not without its criticisms.

  2. Assess the view that conscience is given to us by God.

    Piaget concludes that children develop from egocentric to operational thought where they are able to consider things from another person's point of view. This suggests that a person's conscience is developed not God given. Kohlberg expands on this theory of moral development and identifies six stages which then fell into three levels.

  1. Evaluate the claim that the soul is distinct from the body:

    Bertrand Russell agreed and gave the examples of football to illustrate this point. He suggested that football couldn?t exists without footballers and in turn, the colour red, could not exist without red objects. As such, the soul cannot exist without a body to function in.

  2. Critically assess the claim that the conscience is the voice of reason (35)

    Piaget and Kohlberg believed that it is the authority figures in our life, most specifically our parents, which will influence the morals of our conscience. Between the ages of 5 and 10 our conscience is still immature and under the influence of our parents, to shows us the punishments for rules being broken; Heteronomous.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work