• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Defenders of situation ethics would argue that one of its key strengths is its flexibility; it allows for pragmatic decisions to be made where rule-based ethical systems follow their own absolute commandments.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

(ii) How far do the weaknesses lead to a rejection of the theory? 9 marks Defenders of situation ethics would argue that one of its key strengths is its flexibility; it allows for pragmatic decisions to be made where rule-based ethical systems follow their own absolute commandments. It takes the circumstances into account where they ignore them, disallowing some actions 'whatever the circumstances.' The frequent attempts to sidestep them are a tacit acknowledgment that this is the case, and can lead to some very confused situations. For example, the removal of the Fallopian tube, with its indirect result of the death of a foetus which would otherwise cause the mother's death, is ...read more.

Middle

This is a gut reaction, not in itself a reason for saying that killing is automatically wrong any more than the fact that some people are instinctively racist shows that racism is right. Its supporters would also claim that situation ethics focuses on humans rather than what amounts to a worship of laws and abstract principles. These only have ultimate value to the extent that they help people. The argument is that the only basis for something being morally good can be the resulting feelings of human beings, and situationalists like Joseph Fletcher have argued that because Christianity's God is a personal one, its moral approach should be centred around human beings too. ...read more.

Conclusion

Also, it is often very hard for someone to individually judge what is loving, as they are bound to see things from their perspective. Some selfishness can easily creep in with no firm rules, and love can also lead to favouritism. But a strong argument against situation ethics is that it tends to assume that just because an act is well motivated, it is automatically right. This is clearly not the case. Just because you wouldn't blame someone who accidentally killed two kids while trying to save his neighbour's dog, doesn't mean that his action was, with hindsight, objectively right. It could be argued that the motives did not love. ?? ?? ?? ?? Kerrie Freeman ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

3/5

The essay lands a couple of good points in favour of situation ethics. Nevertheless, it is held back by the absence of a clear conclusion, and indeed, argument in general, that addresses the question. Given the question, a little more focus on the weaknesses of the approach would be good here, even if it is ultimately argued that they do not overcome its strengths. While good points are made pro and con situation ethics more consideration is needed in terms of weighing these up, rather than just listing them.

Marked by teacher David Moss 31/03/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain how moral decisions should be made according to: Act and Rule utilitarianism

    3 star(s)

    Our actions should create the greatest happiness in the greatest number of people. However, just having the principle of utility is not enough, we need to calculate how much pleasure or pain an action has. To help us with this calculation, Bentham came up with the hedonic calculus.

  2. Explain Plato's Theory of Forms

    Within this theory it is assumed that particular examples of, e.g. good behaviour, are simply individual instances of the form of good. AO2 How convincing is his Theory's? Plato's Theory of Forms has had many criticisms; one being that it is not really a theory.

  1. The verification principle offers no real challenge to religious belief. Discuss

    Ayer suggested that something is "directly verifiable if it is either itself an observation- statement, or is such that in conjunction with one or more observation- statements it entails at least one observation- statement which is not deducible from these premises alone.

  2. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    Ockham did not think it possible to prove that there was only one God nor that the most perfect being possibly existed. Either God is:- The most perfect being that actually exists, in this case there is clearly such a being but this does not mean it is the

  1. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the teleological, deontological and hybrid systems of ethics ...

    Situation Ethics can again be used here as an example of this, as Fletcher's theory is based on Agape love and the idea of doing good. In a 21st century medical issue such as choosing between a heart transplant or several eye improving operations, it is easy to apply this

  2. Explain and evaluate the role of conscience in moral decision-making

    Sigmund Freud was a psychiatrist that took a secular view on the conscience. He studied the human mind and its effects on the body. He also saw that human personality like Butler could be put into a hierarchy. Both Freud and Butler put drives such as sexual drives at the bottom of the triangle.

  1. Evaluate the claim that the soul is distinct from the body:

    Bertrand Russell agreed and gave the examples of football to illustrate this point. He suggested that football couldn?t exists without footballers and in turn, the colour red, could not exist without red objects. As such, the soul cannot exist without a body to function in.

  2. Is Religious Language Meaningful?

    He suggests that religious believers have bliks about the world and use God to support it. Similarly empiricists have bliks and the way they see the world leads them to believe that everything must be scientifically proven. Hare says neither is more wrong or more right, thus religious language is meaningful but only to those with the same bliks.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work