• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Defenders of situation ethics would argue that one of its key strengths is its flexibility; it allows for pragmatic decisions to be made where rule-based ethical systems follow their own absolute commandments.

Extracts from this document...


(ii) How far do the weaknesses lead to a rejection of the theory? 9 marks Defenders of situation ethics would argue that one of its key strengths is its flexibility; it allows for pragmatic decisions to be made where rule-based ethical systems follow their own absolute commandments. It takes the circumstances into account where they ignore them, disallowing some actions 'whatever the circumstances.' The frequent attempts to sidestep them are a tacit acknowledgment that this is the case, and can lead to some very confused situations. For example, the removal of the Fallopian tube, with its indirect result of the death of a foetus which would otherwise cause the mother's death, is ...read more.


This is a gut reaction, not in itself a reason for saying that killing is automatically wrong any more than the fact that some people are instinctively racist shows that racism is right. Its supporters would also claim that situation ethics focuses on humans rather than what amounts to a worship of laws and abstract principles. These only have ultimate value to the extent that they help people. The argument is that the only basis for something being morally good can be the resulting feelings of human beings, and situationalists like Joseph Fletcher have argued that because Christianity's God is a personal one, its moral approach should be centred around human beings too. ...read more.


Also, it is often very hard for someone to individually judge what is loving, as they are bound to see things from their perspective. Some selfishness can easily creep in with no firm rules, and love can also lead to favouritism. But a strong argument against situation ethics is that it tends to assume that just because an act is well motivated, it is automatically right. This is clearly not the case. Just because you wouldn't blame someone who accidentally killed two kids while trying to save his neighbour's dog, doesn't mean that his action was, with hindsight, objectively right. It could be argued that the motives did not love. ?? ?? ?? ?? Kerrie Freeman ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)


The essay lands a couple of good points in favour of situation ethics. Nevertheless, it is held back by the absence of a clear conclusion, and indeed, argument in general, that addresses the question. Given the question, a little more focus on the weaknesses of the approach would be good here, even if it is ultimately argued that they do not overcome its strengths. While good points are made pro and con situation ethics more consideration is needed in terms of weighing these up, rather than just listing them.

Marked by teacher David Moss 31/03/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain how moral decisions should be made according to: Act and Rule utilitarianism

    3 star(s)

    Our actions should create the greatest happiness in the greatest number of people. However, just having the principle of utility is not enough, we need to calculate how much pleasure or pain an action has. To help us with this calculation, Bentham came up with the hedonic calculus.

  2. Explain Plato's Theory of Forms

    Plato is vague in this section when explaining what has forms. He is ambiguous as to whether or not there is a Form for literally everything. Plato's ideas of immortality of the soul are dependent on our acceptance of his other ideas about the existence of Forms and about knowledge being recollection or re-cognition of things we already know.

  1. The verification principle offers no real challenge to religious belief. Discuss

    however black holes cannot be observed; instead scientists demonstrated their existence by looking at other evidence which suggested the existence of the black hole Although there is still a major problem that Verificationism is unverifiable. Many philosophers have pointed out that claiming 'statements are only meaningful if verifiable by sense-observation' is itself unverifiable.

  2. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    If there actually is a cause of all existing things, but if that cause requires a cause and that cause another and so on ad infinitum, then nothing will exist at all. If it is true that the mere existence of things requires a cause, but if there is no

  1. Plato's Theory of Forms.

    The prisoners represent most people, who do not question, and are content within their "comfort zone". However, the prisoner who is let free, is a philosopher, namely Socrates, who is inquisitive and prepared to venture into the unknown. His first movements are painful because this shows how is hard to

  2. Examine the main strengths and weakness of the Cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    and the ball hitting the floor (effect) - or is there? One of the most credible premises of the argument has come under scrutiny by both modern science and philosophers. Famously, David Hume has claimed that humans allow themselves mistakenly to make a connection between cause and effect, saying that

  1. Explain and evaluate the role of conscience in moral decision-making

    Sigmund Freud was a psychiatrist that took a secular view on the conscience. He studied the human mind and its effects on the body. He also saw that human personality like Butler could be put into a hierarchy. Both Freud and Butler put drives such as sexual drives at the bottom of the triangle.

  2. Evaluate the claim that the soul is distinct from the body:

    Bertrand Russell agreed and gave the examples of football to illustrate this point. He suggested that football couldn?t exists without footballers and in turn, the colour red, could not exist without red objects. As such, the soul cannot exist without a body to function in.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work