• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Defenders of situation ethics would argue that one of its key strengths is its flexibility; it allows for pragmatic decisions to be made where rule-based ethical systems follow their own absolute commandments.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

(ii) How far do the weaknesses lead to a rejection of the theory? 9 marks Defenders of situation ethics would argue that one of its key strengths is its flexibility; it allows for pragmatic decisions to be made where rule-based ethical systems follow their own absolute commandments. It takes the circumstances into account where they ignore them, disallowing some actions 'whatever the circumstances.' The frequent attempts to sidestep them are a tacit acknowledgment that this is the case, and can lead to some very confused situations. For example, the removal of the Fallopian tube, with its indirect result of the death of a foetus which would otherwise cause the mother's death, is ...read more.

Middle

This is a gut reaction, not in itself a reason for saying that killing is automatically wrong any more than the fact that some people are instinctively racist shows that racism is right. Its supporters would also claim that situation ethics focuses on humans rather than what amounts to a worship of laws and abstract principles. These only have ultimate value to the extent that they help people. The argument is that the only basis for something being morally good can be the resulting feelings of human beings, and situationalists like Joseph Fletcher have argued that because Christianity's God is a personal one, its moral approach should be centred around human beings too. ...read more.

Conclusion

Also, it is often very hard for someone to individually judge what is loving, as they are bound to see things from their perspective. Some selfishness can easily creep in with no firm rules, and love can also lead to favouritism. But a strong argument against situation ethics is that it tends to assume that just because an act is well motivated, it is automatically right. This is clearly not the case. Just because you wouldn't blame someone who accidentally killed two kids while trying to save his neighbour's dog, doesn't mean that his action was, with hindsight, objectively right. It could be argued that the motives did not love. ?? ?? ?? ?? Kerrie Freeman ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

3/5

The essay lands a couple of good points in favour of situation ethics. Nevertheless, it is held back by the absence of a clear conclusion, and indeed, argument in general, that addresses the question. Given the question, a little more focus on the weaknesses of the approach would be good here, even if it is ultimately argued that they do not overcome its strengths. While good points are made pro and con situation ethics more consideration is needed in terms of weighing these up, rather than just listing them.

Marked by teacher David Moss 31/03/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Plato's Theory of Forms.

    discover 'new truths', and that it is easier to stick with what we already know - in other words, to be ignorant. The prisoners' gradual adjustment to the light shows we only learn through questioning, and the light, or the Sun, resembles 'Goodness' - warmth and light, essential to life.

  2. Explain what Plato meant by the Form of the Good?

    that the existence of the Forms is not necessarily the obvious conclusion of logical reasoning or the only conclusion after the evidence that Plato presents us with. Plato also doesn't provide a convincing argument in favour of belief that the there is a world of ideas which is more real that the world of appearances.

  1. Explain Plato's Theory of Forms

    It relies on the 'Analogy of the Cave' to support and explain its' details. This suggests that Plato is unsure of Forms himself, or at least how to explain them. It is suggested that the Theory is unsure of the extent of the Forms, for example, is there a Form for humanity or each individual?

  2. Critically assess the design argument

    The argument from Aquinas is without doubt significant to the design argument as it clearly appears to demonstrate evidence which suggests towards cause and effect in the world. This cause and effect theory attempts to show that things are

  1. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    no way of moving from this to showing that God is the most perfect possible being.33 Another form of the cosmological argument is the Kalam Cosmological argument which was first put forward by Islamic theologians and philosophers. Kalam means 'discourse' or 'argument'.34 Instead of arguing that the universe depends on

  2. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the teleological, deontological and hybrid systems of ethics ...

    Situation Ethics can again be used here as an example of this, as Fletcher's theory is based on Agape love and the idea of doing good. In a 21st century medical issue such as choosing between a heart transplant or several eye improving operations, it is easy to apply this

  1. Explain and evaluate the role of conscience in moral decision-making

    Sigmund Freud was a psychiatrist that took a secular view on the conscience. He studied the human mind and its effects on the body. He also saw that human personality like Butler could be put into a hierarchy. Both Freud and Butler put drives such as sexual drives at the bottom of the triangle.

  2. Philosophers have proved conclusively that religious language is meaningful. Discuss

    The group didn?t seek to understand how we gain knowledge about the external world but how we use language as means of conveying that knowledge. The main principle of logical positivism was that only those propositions which can be verified empirically have any meaning.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work