• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Deontology - looking for an objective basis to ground all moral action.

Extracts from this document...


Deontology The deontologist, like the utilitarian is looking for an objective basis to ground all moral actions. Unlike a utilitarian, though, a deontologist would completely reject the idea that the goodness or badness of an act can be determined by its consequences. For the deontologist there must be something intrinsic to the act itself that determines its moral status. Wrong actions are wrong per se and actions which are right are not necessarily those which maximise the good. Deontology identifies those actions which are wrong even if they produce predicted or actual consequences, and are right simply because of the kind of actions that they are. Deontology takes several forms, these include: Rights - an action is morally right if it respects the rights which all humans have. This is known as Libertarianism, a political philosophy which claims that people should be free to act as they wish, as long as their actions do not impact on the rights of others. ...read more.


First, Kant argues that to act in the morally right way, people must act according to duty. Second, Kant argued that it was not the consequences of actions that make them right or wrong but the motives of the person who carries out the action. Kant's argument that to act in the morally right way, one must act from duty, begins with an argument that the highest good must be both good in itself, and good without qualification. Something is 'good in itself' when it is essentially good, and 'good without qualification' when the addition of that thing never makes a situation ethically worse. Kant then argues that those things that are usually thought to be good, such as intelligence, perseverance and pleasure, fail to be either essentially good or good without qualification. Pleasure, for example, appears to not be good without qualification, because when people take pleasure in watching someone suffering, this seems to make the situation ethically worse. ...read more.


There must surely be some things beyond fad or fashion. Finally, deontology provides objective guidelines for making moral decisions, without the need for lengthy calculation of possible outcomes. However, the weaknesses of the theory are that moral obligations appear arbitrary or inexplicable except by reference to duty. In reality, our decision- making is influence by many more factors, and it is indeed questionable whether duty is as good a motive as Kant suggested. Also how far can a good will or motive mitigate a disastrous outcome? Are we really only concerned to know the 'form' of moral behaviour (duty, for example) or do we want to know more about its content? Are we satisfied with being told 'Do your duty' without understanding why? Kant argues that what is good to do is what we ought to do and that what is inherently good and essentially right is the way in which we ought to behave for the mutual good of all, irrespective of consequences. In this respect, critics of Kant have accused him of committing the Naturalistic Fallacy - of turning 'is' into 'ought'. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Analyse and explain the strengths and weaknesses of deontology

    However, JS Mill has claimed that Kant was contradicting himself in first evaluating the consequences of universalising a maxim, and then declaring that this action was therefore good or bad in and of itself. This surely is merely another form of teleology masquerading as deontology, as it is only through

  2. Describe Kant’s theory of duty as the basis for morality.

    It has also been the inspiration for other philosophers. This is because it provides an excellent base for morality, as it considers the individual, though also provides a sense of moral obligation that makes you contemplate your actions.

  1. Explain Kant's theory of Duty as the basis for morality

    In his book, Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, quoted from above, he argues that the highest form of good is good will and to have a good will is to do one's duty. To do one's duty is to perform actions that are morally required, and to avoid actions that are morally forbidden.

  2. Utilitarianism VS Kantian Deontological Ethics

    Indeed, if everybody rang the ambulance whilst you were injured, it would not be the most effective aid for yourself, and thus would no doubt not be able to be willed as a universal law. Simply rewriting the maxim to something such as 'Always do the thing that will help most when someone is injured' could easily solve the predicament.

  1. Whilst Deontology has its attractions it fails to provide a reliable foundation for moral ...

    Like many theories, Deontology has its strengths and weaknesses. One of its main strengths is that it is an absolutist theory. This means it is either intrinsically good or bad, e.g. do not commit murder. This is a major strength as it makes an easy theory people to follow.

  2. Describe Kant’s theory of Duty as the basis of morality (33 marks).

    Kant simply states that ' a good wills only motive is to act for the sake of duty'. For an act to be universally, intrinsically good in itself, it must not be done because of its consequences, nor from self-interest, fear or as a means to an end, rather only because it is our soul duty to do it.

  1. Evaluate Korsgaard's discussion of the Universalizability Argument. In what ways does she conform with ...

    By virtue of which it becomes a substantive command. In this case, Korsgaard thinks that the person must think of himself first as a citizen of the Kingdom of Ends. Kant does not show that universalization must range over human beings as such. By this, the person must treat his humanity as a normative identity, a source of principles and laws for himself.

  2. Utilitarianism.After Bentham had established that pleasure and pain were the important factors in determining ...

    Bentham believed that if a person did not follow the utility principle they should be punished Bentham obviously realised that it was impossible to use the calculus in every small moral decision that had to be made and the methodology was extremely complex.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work