• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe Aristotle's teaching about the difference between the final cause and the other sorts of cause.

Extracts from this document...


Aristotle's Four Causes a) Describe Aristotle's teaching about the difference between the final cause and the other sorts of cause. (25 marks) Unlike Plato and Socrates before him, Aristotle did not believe in the World Of Forms and therefore the idea that everything could be measured using it's 'Perfect Form'. He was an empiricist, and believed that everything in this world has four reasons for being rather than just it's purpose. He said that each thing had four reasons which explained what, why and how they were, these reasons were what he called The Four Causes. The Four Causes are: 1) The Material Cause - what a thing is made of i.e. metal, wood etc., 2) The Efficient Cause - how it came into being, i.e. what/who made it, 3) The Formal Cause - what characteristics does it have that makes it what it is, i.e. What makes a table fall into the category of furniture, and finally 4) ...read more.


or "What is it for?", it is occasionally "Where did it come from?" or "What is it made from?" and very rarely "What makes this fit into (category i.e. furniture)?". So, from our (and Aristotle's) point of view, The Final Cause is very important or most important. The difference between Aristotle's Final Cause and his other three is that Final Cause is the only one concerned with the purpose of something rather than what makes/made it what it is. For instance a baby: a baby's Material Cause is organs, blood, bone and tissue, it's Efficient would be it's parents who created it, it's Formal Cause is that it is human and it's Final Cause would be that it will inevitably turn into an adult human or rather that it has the potential to become an adult. However, the Final Cause is impossible without the other causes and vice versa. According to Aristotle, if for instance the Material Cause is altered (i.e. ...read more.


According to Aristotle's theory using an object for anything other than what it was made for should turn it into something else. Another problem with Aristotle's theory is similar to those posed by Plato's Perfect Form theory. This is that according to Aristotle, if anything reaches it's full potential (does what it is supposed to do, it's Final Cause), then it has reached perfection. However, this does not work with our idea of 'perfection', if Aristotle's idea is right then when a disease for example, whose Final Cause is to be fatal and to cause pain achieves it's Final purpose then it is perfect, but how can it be perfect if it kills or harms someone? On the other hand, the Four Causes theory does seem more valid than for instance Plato's World Of Forms. Aristotle's theory accounts for us being able to categorize objects, define what they are made from and how they came into existence without having to say "They just are.". According to Aristotle the only thing which 'just is' is the Prime Mover. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Plato versus Aristotle on well being

    thing to do in this situation then I must follow that it is the most beneficial and right thing to do in all situations. But why is it the most beneficial? Why should people be just, Plato believes that it is down to the tri-partite nature of the soul; if

  2. Evaluate plato and aristotle on well being

    Justice in the soul can only be present when the tripartite elements are in accurate harmony; when reason is ruling over spirit and spirit is controlling desires or appetites; wisdom can be seen to represent the rational part of the soul and courage parallels the spirited part of the soul with discipline existing in controlling desires.

  1. Describe Aristotle's teaching about the differences between the final cause and other sorts of ...

    It is the means, which brings something about. It is the source of motion, generation or change. Thirdly, the formal cause, this cause produces the characteristics, which make the "thing" fit into whichever category it fits into. It is the species, kind or type. An example of how this works is a statue.

  2. A) Explain what Aristotle meant by the final cause.

    'Aristotle was wrong to say that everything has a purpose'. Discuss. Some people perceive the above statement to be true. This is understandable because the telos of certain objects can be hidden and difficult to understand. Eg, what is the purpose of a person?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work