• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe Kant’s theory of duty as the basis for morality.

Extracts from this document...


Describe Kant's theory of duty as the basis for morality. Kant's ethical theory's had an immense effect on how people viewed morality. The German Protestant lived from 1724 to 1804, and worked to create a rational basis for morality. His ideas are highly significant, as the influence from science, the enlightenment and Rousseau's positive view of human nature, has challenged and influenced many people's views. The foundation of this theory is the sense of moral obligation, or duty, we each possess. Kant then proceeded to use this idea as a foundation for his own moral philosophy, as have many philosophers after him. Kant proposed that our actions cannot be good unless they are also morally right- these two qualities must exist together. By this, Kant is separating the ideas of good behaviour and good will. 'Good will' is a term often used by Kant, and can be also defined as 'good intention.' Kant put this concept at the centre of his ethical theory by suggesting, 'there is no possibility of thinking anything at all in the world, or even out of it, which can be regarded as good without qualification, except a good will.' Kant's most important contribution to ethics was his idea that our actions are only truly good when we do our duty for it's` own sake. ...read more.


Although criticised for being too optimistic by some, if all people followed his theories as he suggested, the world would benefit considerably. How satisfactory is Kant's theory for practical purpose. A main criticism of Kant is that it is far too optimistic. This can be attributed to many factors, but mainly that Kant himself had an unrealistic positive outlook on the world. This is why his theories are often difficult to apply to practical situations. Kant's maxim does have a certain advantage in practical situations. It provides a test, which people can work out themselves- they do not have to look at physics or God to decide on morally right actions. Apart from this plus, it is difficult to find any other examples of Kant's theory being useful to apply to practical situations. An example of this is Kant's belief that all humans have a sense of moral obligation. This is not necessarily true, many people do not think about the morality of their actions, or feel that they have to. Kant also suggested that our moral actions should be categorical imperatives not hypothetical ones. But if you take away desire and consequence from an ethical decision, it does not encourage people to act morally at all. ...read more.


However, if I was poor and starving and needed to steal to eat, I could excuse myself as I could see my actions as right, as I need to steal in order to survive. Didn't Kant say that humans are of value and should be respected, especially above objects? Kant also suggested that if something cannot be universalised, it cannot be right. How far can this rule apply in practical situations? Kant said the principle of universalisability applies to people in the same situation as you. Therefore, stealing when you are starving can be seen as morally right; as you may believe it is acceptable for everyone who is starving to steal. What are the boundaries to this rule though? Is anyone ever in the same situation? A person could say that it is fine for 44 year old, divorced and alcoholic homeless men to steal to survive, but not for anyone else. The theory then begins to seem illogical, as the principle becomes relative, rather than absolute. Kant never explored these ideas. In conclusion, it seems as though Kant's ethical theory is awkward to apply to practical situations, as the faults in Kant's work only makes moral choices more complex. It can be said though, that Kant's theory can help to guide our practical ethical decisions, by making us consider the morality of our actions- as long as we do not follow his rules to closely. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Emotivism as an Ethical Theory

    fact that the scientific, or empirical method of verification is not sufficient for ethics. The first of these features is apparent in everyday life. Disagreements in ethics are often genuine and not superficial. If A says that euthanasia is unacceptable and B argues the opposite they are disagreeing on a number of fundamental issues.

  2. Deontology - looking for an objective basis to ground all moral action.

    He concludes that there is only one thing that is truly good: "Nothing in the world-indeed nothing even beyond the world-can possibly be conceived which could be called good without qualification except a good will." - Kant Kant then argues that the consequences of an act of willing cannot be

  1. Ethical Criticism of McDonalds

    The impact of a McDonald's diet on children is also a major ethical concern, as an increasing number of children are faced with obesity problems. 'Every month, 90 percent of the children between 3 and 9 in America visit a McDonald's' (Schlosser, 2001).

  2. "Humanitarian intervention, which is ruled out by realism and the morality of states, can ...

    If there are no universally acceptable moral standards, no moral standards can be applied across the globe. It is very difficult to decipher whether or not humanitarian intervention is in conflict with the doctrine of cultural relativism. If one supposes that humanitarian intervention is justified in one instance, for example

  1. Evaluate Korsgaard's discussion of the Universalizability Argument. In what ways does she conform with ...

    It sets the stage for the acknowledgment of self as Citizen in such Kingdom of Ends. Third, moral identity emerges from deep-seated particular ties and commitments. It is identified as the meta-entity to practical and social identity. Fourth, moral identity is the universal ethical self.

  2. The Ethical Debate Concerning Cloning.

    These are success problems, not failure problems. They come about because of biomedical advances. The entrance of science into medicine at the Renaissance changed it from stop-gap fatalism to a real and effective control over illness and health. For example, when I listed the various historic meanings of the word hospital, I left one out- "spital."

  1. Kant's Theory of Universal Law

    (Sherman, notes) In addition, the Categorical Imperative operates under the belief that all beings respect the Universal Law themselves.

  2. Explain the differences between absolute and relative morality. 'Relativist theories give no convincing reason ...

    Absolute refers to the fact that the moral laws will not and cannot change, and are the same for everyone everywhere through all periods of time, such as Kant's deontological theory. Relative means the rules may change depending on the circumstances, the individual, the society or the time period.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work