• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe Kant’s theory of duty as the basis for morality.

Extracts from this document...


Describe Kant's theory of duty as the basis for morality. Kant's ethical theory's had an immense effect on how people viewed morality. The German Protestant lived from 1724 to 1804, and worked to create a rational basis for morality. His ideas are highly significant, as the influence from science, the enlightenment and Rousseau's positive view of human nature, has challenged and influenced many people's views. The foundation of this theory is the sense of moral obligation, or duty, we each possess. Kant then proceeded to use this idea as a foundation for his own moral philosophy, as have many philosophers after him. Kant proposed that our actions cannot be good unless they are also morally right- these two qualities must exist together. By this, Kant is separating the ideas of good behaviour and good will. 'Good will' is a term often used by Kant, and can be also defined as 'good intention.' Kant put this concept at the centre of his ethical theory by suggesting, 'there is no possibility of thinking anything at all in the world, or even out of it, which can be regarded as good without qualification, except a good will.' Kant's most important contribution to ethics was his idea that our actions are only truly good when we do our duty for it's` own sake. ...read more.


Although criticised for being too optimistic by some, if all people followed his theories as he suggested, the world would benefit considerably. How satisfactory is Kant's theory for practical purpose. A main criticism of Kant is that it is far too optimistic. This can be attributed to many factors, but mainly that Kant himself had an unrealistic positive outlook on the world. This is why his theories are often difficult to apply to practical situations. Kant's maxim does have a certain advantage in practical situations. It provides a test, which people can work out themselves- they do not have to look at physics or God to decide on morally right actions. Apart from this plus, it is difficult to find any other examples of Kant's theory being useful to apply to practical situations. An example of this is Kant's belief that all humans have a sense of moral obligation. This is not necessarily true, many people do not think about the morality of their actions, or feel that they have to. Kant also suggested that our moral actions should be categorical imperatives not hypothetical ones. But if you take away desire and consequence from an ethical decision, it does not encourage people to act morally at all. ...read more.


However, if I was poor and starving and needed to steal to eat, I could excuse myself as I could see my actions as right, as I need to steal in order to survive. Didn't Kant say that humans are of value and should be respected, especially above objects? Kant also suggested that if something cannot be universalised, it cannot be right. How far can this rule apply in practical situations? Kant said the principle of universalisability applies to people in the same situation as you. Therefore, stealing when you are starving can be seen as morally right; as you may believe it is acceptable for everyone who is starving to steal. What are the boundaries to this rule though? Is anyone ever in the same situation? A person could say that it is fine for 44 year old, divorced and alcoholic homeless men to steal to survive, but not for anyone else. The theory then begins to seem illogical, as the principle becomes relative, rather than absolute. Kant never explored these ideas. In conclusion, it seems as though Kant's ethical theory is awkward to apply to practical situations, as the faults in Kant's work only makes moral choices more complex. It can be said though, that Kant's theory can help to guide our practical ethical decisions, by making us consider the morality of our actions- as long as we do not follow his rules to closely. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Explain Kant's theory of Duty as the basis for morality

    Kant (1788) He did not look at the world and ask if freedom and moral choice where possible. Instead, he started with the existence of moral choice, and then sought to find its implications. So, for example, we know we are free because we experience moral choice, we do not

  2. `Always tell the truth and Always keep your promises' Kant's Categorical Imperative.

    I am logically committed to having everyone else treat me simply as a means to their ends. I am opening up the door for everyone else to swindle me without any compunction or consideration. Clearly, if I were to assent to this I would not be rational but singularly foolish.

  1. The Ethical Debate Concerning Cloning.

    I am personally confident that this is indeed good medicine, i.e., humane, but to see it this way is to have chosen a quality-of-life ethics instead of the traditional sanctity-of-life ethics. 2 The issue has its bearing on many other problems of medical management, such as the current National Institute

  2. Emotivism as an Ethical Theory

    Stevenson was interested in the way people use moral terms in everyday language. What could be said about conversation? It is possible to see three features emerging from Stevenson's analysis. The fact that genuine moral agreements and disagreements occur within (them); The fact that moral terms have, a 'magnetism'; The

  1. Deontology - looking for an objective basis to ground all moral action.

    Deontology therefore consists of two strands - identifying what is permissible and what is impermissible. Immanuel Kant's theory of ethics is considered deontological for several different reasons.

  2. Religion and Morality

    There are theories in concurrence with Autonomy which allow still for a good, firm morality without dependency on religion such as Utilitarianism (greatest good for greatest number)

  1. Explain the differences between absolute and relative morality. 'Relativist theories give no convincing reason ...

    But relativism is a lot less clear. Not only are we not provided with a clear reason to be good, the very definition of good may change, depending on circumstances, time period, culture or individual. So how can anybody know that they are truly doing the 'right' thing?

  2. Examine the key ideas of one critique of the link between religion and morality. ...

    Christians are reduced to acting out of fear of divine punishment in order to gain eschatological reward. This presents the question of whether their actions are truly moral, if their motives are tainted.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work