• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of Utilitarianism

Extracts from this document...


Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of Utilitarianism Strengths * Utilitarianism is simple. It doesn't have a lot of complex rules, but instead the individual can decide would be the 'best', by how it affects others. * It is flexible: no law or principle is unchallengeable. * It allows for circumstance, so you can decide what is the best thing to do given the current circumstance. * It ties in with the Christian ethic of unconditional love, as preached by Jesus. * If someone believes that both lying and breaking promises are acts that are intrinsically wrong, utilitarianism provides a principled way in which they can choose which moral rule to break if forced to make a choice between them. * The emphasis on impartiality, unselfishness and altruism is to be commended. * There is no need to consider precedents as absolute - just because one action worked for someone does not mean that it must be enforced again, when it may not work for someone else. ...read more.


Some would claim that utilitarians are simply idealistic and unrealistic because they do not accurately evaluate human behaviour and just assume we are all perfect, caring equally for everyone. * It is impossible to be certain about a consequence, which is a general problem with teleological ethics. * It is very difficult to measure pleasure given by any outcome. It will take a great deal of time, thought and study, considering effects on both people and the situation. * Can we compare one person's happiness to another person's happiness? * If only the total happiness counts, imagine these two situations: [A] 80% population live very well and are very happy because the other 20% are their slaves. [B] There are no slaves and everyone is happy but not as happy as the 80% in situation A. The total and average happiness in both situations is the same, therefore to a utilitarian there is no difference between the two, and both are equally morally right, but slavery is considered wrong. ...read more.


* Rule utilitarianism may just be act utilitarianism in disguise: all the rules are focussed around the maximisation of happiness. Rule utilitarians believe that the best way to maximise happiness is to maximise happiness with every act- but this is just act utilitarianism. * Human rights, justices, and other such values may not have any place in a utilitarian ethical system if the wishes of the majority override them. * Christians, Muslims, and others of religious faith would argue that god decides what is rights, and what is the best outcome; it is not four humans to try to calculate. * Utilitarianism ignores 'meaning well' - benevolent motives. * Utilitarianism "seems to require more of a human that many are capable of providing" * Just as there are no absolutes for determining acts which are intrinsically wrong, there is also no way to define what is universally good. * There must be sufficient account taken of the minority view - the majority are not always right, even though the satisfaction of their wishes might create the most happiness. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Analyse and explain the strengths and weaknesses of deontology

    It is clear that they are not analytically true, and it is necessary to hypothesise on what would happen if everyone followed a certain rule. However, since it is obvious that in this world not everyone does follow that certain rule it is not logically impossible to advocate lying in

  2. Outline the main features of Utilitarianism andExamine critically criticisms that have been offered against ...

    action may not be outweighed at some future date by negative ones. The procedure advocated by utilitarianism, therefore, is unrealistic and impractical as a method for calculating the real consequences of an action, only for postulating the possible consequences as far as we are able to make estimation.

  1. Examine the key features of utilitarianism and its strengths and weaknesses of utilitarianism

    Higher pleasures were associated with the mind, such as mental disciple and cultural activities, where as lower pleasures were pleasures associated with the body such as satisfying the bodily need for food and sleep. As Henry Sidgewick stated though "In practice it is hard to distinguish between higher and lower pleasures."

  2. Identify the main problems of Utilitarianism. To what extent do these make Utilitarianism unacceptable? ...

    For many this is a huge obstacle, making Utilitarianism unacceptable. Contrary to the link that I earlier made between Utilitarianism and religion, many feel that they theory is very secular.

  1. Outline and explain the ethical theory of utilitarianism b) ...

    followed by other pleasures, or pains by other pains), its purity (or how likely the pleasure is of being followed by pain) and its extent (or how many people will be affected by the pleasure). To sum up, the action that leads to the best consequence (i.e.

  2. What is Natural Moral Law? What are the strengths and weaknesses of NML?

    We are meant to live, grow, reproduce and die. However there are people such as Mother Theresa and St Thomas Aquinas who have both failed to reproduce - does that mean that these two are wrong bad bad people ?

  1. The Ethical Debate Concerning Cloning.

    He is contradicted by quarantine, compulsory vaccination, and mandatory autopsies in mysterious epidemics. And these things are only minor complications of traditional medical piety, compared to what is coming. What medicine needs is a moral telescope, not a moral microscope.

  2. Explain the strengths and weaknesses of Utilitarianism

    Furthermore, it means that present circumstances can be judged without reference to past precedence. In this way the theory is greatly similar to 'situation ethics' that allows certain actions to be taken which suit the particular situation. Nevertheless, the principle of utility has come under fire from a number of different sources.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work