• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe the origins and nature of the Ontological argument for the existence of God.

Extracts from this document...


Transfer-Encoding: chunked ´╗┐Describe the origins and nature of the Ontological argument for the existence of God. [35] The question of the existence of God is one of the most debated concepts for humanity. For centuries theologians and philosophers alike have put forward arguments, one of which is the ontological argument. This argument is debatably the most logical but also the most difficult to grasp; this is due to its nature as a priori deduction that does not require physical evidence. It is an argument of credo ut intelligam ? I believe in order to understand. In examining the ontological argument, a good place to start would be Anselm?s view on it. Anselm was Archbishop of Canterbury from 1033 ? 1109. He wrote the ontological argument in the second chapter of his Proslogion. It is worth noting that he was writing in order to assure theists of their faith, not to convince atheists. ...read more.


The painter can imagine what he wants to paint, but the painting does not truly exist until he paints it. In the same way, God cannot only exist in the mind. Furthermore, Anselm uses God?s perfection to prove his existence as part of the ontological argument. God is the ultimate perfect, and to be truly perfect he must exist in both mind and reality. He can?t be perfect if he does not exist. He effectively defines God into existence. If this was applied in the world this would be absurd, a criticism Gaunilo picked up on. Gaunilo was a theist, but critical of the ontological argument. He argued that he could just as easily imagine the perfect holiday island, but that does not mean it exists in reality. Anselm countered his argument by asserting that an island is subjective in its perfection, but God is not. ...read more.


These include Platinga and Malcom. Platinga argued the possible worlds theory: if there are any number of possible worlds, God must rationally exist on at least one of them. If God possess the qualities of maximum greatness and perfection on this world, he must logically possess these characteristics on all worlds. Our world is a possible world, so therefore God must exist. Malcom follows on and argues that God cannot be contingently existent (relying on something else), so he must be either necessary or impossible. We cannot say that God is totally impossible unless we have existed in all times and all places to verify that God is nowhere to be found. He is not impossible, therefore he must be necessary. If he is necessary, he exists. To conclude, the ontological argument ? when understood ? is a very logical argument that continues to be used by scholars today. It may not be the most effective for convincing the atheist, but it serves its primary purpose of assuring the theist of their faith. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. The Ontological Argument - Critique

    Kant argued that existence, in the form which Descartes presented it, was not a true predicate to anything; Kant maintained that, for something to be a true predicate, it must change our perception of the object it refers to: a valid predicate to a book may be hard backed, it

  2. Examine the major features of the Ontological argument for the existence of God.

    Descartes argument brought with it many criticisms, Gassendi was the first to say that existence was not a property but was something else. He argued that a being without existence would not be imperfect; the being would be nothing as it would not exist.

  1. Analyze the distinctive features of the Ontological Argument

    We cannot conceive of things we did not experience. As Kant responded to Descartes argument, if there is no triangle there are no 3 sides or any degrees so if there is no perfection God does not exist. Apparently perfection does not exist in our world so God cannot exist..

  2. Compare and contrast the contributions of Descartes and Humes on the issue of the ...

    Movement: A moved by B moved by ............first mover itself unmoved = God Cause: A caused by B caused by ...................first cause itself uncaused = God Existence: always dependent or contingent A is what it is because B is what it is...............first existence is necessary Descartes uses the cosmological argument

  1. Outline the Ontological argument for the existence of God. Comment on the claim that ...

    He did this by using an analogy of a triangle. Descartes asks: 'can you imagine a triangle without three sides?' The answer to which is NO - simply because the very definition of a TRI-angle is to have three sides and three angles.

  2. Utopia - The Impossibility of Perfection

    Furthermore, through the ironic contradiction between a blessed anarchy and a benevolent autocracy, the audience is again presented with the paradoxicity of utopian thought as a whole. It can also be argued that Gonzalo's Commonwealth is but a concentrated microimage of the even bigger utopia in The Tempest that is, the play itself.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work