• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe the origins and nature of the Ontological argument for the existence of God.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Transfer-Encoding: chunked Describe the origins and nature of the Ontological argument for the existence of God. [35] The question of the existence of God is one of the most debated concepts for humanity. For centuries theologians and philosophers alike have put forward arguments, one of which is the ontological argument. This argument is debatably the most logical but also the most difficult to grasp; this is due to its nature as a priori deduction that does not require physical evidence. It is an argument of credo ut intelligam ? I believe in order to understand. In examining the ontological argument, a good place to start would be Anselm?s view on it. Anselm was Archbishop of Canterbury from 1033 ? 1109. He wrote the ontological argument in the second chapter of his Proslogion. It is worth noting that he was writing in order to assure theists of their faith, not to convince atheists. ...read more.

Middle

The painter can imagine what he wants to paint, but the painting does not truly exist until he paints it. In the same way, God cannot only exist in the mind. Furthermore, Anselm uses God?s perfection to prove his existence as part of the ontological argument. God is the ultimate perfect, and to be truly perfect he must exist in both mind and reality. He can?t be perfect if he does not exist. He effectively defines God into existence. If this was applied in the world this would be absurd, a criticism Gaunilo picked up on. Gaunilo was a theist, but critical of the ontological argument. He argued that he could just as easily imagine the perfect holiday island, but that does not mean it exists in reality. Anselm countered his argument by asserting that an island is subjective in its perfection, but God is not. ...read more.

Conclusion

These include Platinga and Malcom. Platinga argued the possible worlds theory: if there are any number of possible worlds, God must rationally exist on at least one of them. If God possess the qualities of maximum greatness and perfection on this world, he must logically possess these characteristics on all worlds. Our world is a possible world, so therefore God must exist. Malcom follows on and argues that God cannot be contingently existent (relying on something else), so he must be either necessary or impossible. We cannot say that God is totally impossible unless we have existed in all times and all places to verify that God is nowhere to be found. He is not impossible, therefore he must be necessary. If he is necessary, he exists. To conclude, the ontological argument ? when understood ? is a very logical argument that continues to be used by scholars today. It may not be the most effective for convincing the atheist, but it serves its primary purpose of assuring the theist of their faith. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. The Ontological Argument - Critique

    Kant argued that existence, in the form which Descartes presented it, was not a true predicate to anything; Kant maintained that, for something to be a true predicate, it must change our perception of the object it refers to: a valid predicate to a book may be hard backed, it

  2. Compare and contrast the contributions of Descartes and Humes on the issue of the ...

    Hume describes causation as a feeling of expectation we get when we have experienced a constant conjunction of events. The teleological argument is the argument from the order in the world to the existence of a being that created it with a specific purpose in mind.

  1. Examine the major features of the Ontological argument for the existence of God.

    The ontological argument does fail as a proof of God's existence for a number of reasons, for example, in the second for of the argument it does not come to a conclusion and therefore cannot be a proof. There have been advocates that have tried to defend the argument and

  2. Give an account of the ontological argument for the existence of God

    Decartes saw existence as perfection and therefore God must have all the perfections including existence. If we tried to imagine God without existence it would be illogical. We cannot separate existence from the essence of God. Malcolm said that God's existence was necessary, just like Anslem because he is the

  1. The Metamorphosis: Existence.

    (Kafka 38) Mr. Samsa, like Gregor, lived his life secluded from the outside world. He allowed for his inabilities to get in the way and gave up sharing and communicating with the "living" community. He was merely existing; just breathing. There was no change or opportunity in his life.

  2. Outline the Ontological argument for the existence of God. Comment on the claim that ...

    However, just because I can conceive it - does it mean that it exists? In this case, it is clear to see that the answer is no. Another analogy which can be used to explain Guanilo's argument is one of a '�100 note.'

  1. Utopia - The Impossibility of Perfection

    a society that disavows private ownership, Hythloday only replies that the concern is not uncommon. This question one that is crucial to the understanding of Utopia remains unanswered, and indeed unanswerable. While Utopia can be regarded as crossover between an awkward blue print for a social system and a fantasy

  2. Outline the Ontological Argument for the existence of God.

    Reductio ad absurdum is a method of reasoning used by Anselm in the Proslogion which aims to demonstrate the truth of something by reducing to absurdity the opposite of what is being proved, Anselm uses this method to reduce to absurdity the opposite of his conclusion, this being that God does not exist.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work