• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Determinism and free will can never be reconciled. Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


?Determinism and free will can never be reconciled.? Discuss. In order to discuss the above statement, we must first understand the terms determinism and free will. Determinism is the philosophical idea that every event, including every human decision and action, is the inevitable and necessary consequence of previous events and are ultimately determined by causes external to the will. Determinism can be divided into two branches; Hard determinists and Soft determinist. Free will, on the other hand, essentially is the human will to act freely without the constraint of necessity or fate. Free will and Determinism can be seen as complete opposites, thus agreeing with the statement. However some believe that the two can be combined. Compatibilism is an attempt to reconcile both free will and determinism and suggests that it is possible to believe both without being logically inconsistent. ...read more.


This idea is summed up well by Locke: ?Our idea of liberty reaches as far as that power, and no farther.? This brings up the question ?so are we truly free?? and there is no straight yes or no answer to that. Free will is our own free choice to make any decision we desire, but how do we come about making a choice? We turn to our conscience which chooses the most desirable choice for you. However, for us to be truly free, our conscience must have no bias, and not be influenced in any way, otherwise we are not, in essence, truly 100% free. Our conscience (i.e. our choice) is influenced by our surroundings, by authority figures like our parents or teachers, by people we look up to and idolise, and by our environment. ...read more.


This is because it doesn?t believe in free will meaning that holding someone accountable for their actions is wrong as they have had no choice in committing the crime. To hold a person morally responsible requires for them to make a choice between two, or more, truly possible alternatives. The only way of reconciling free will and determinism is through the idea of Compatibilism. However, some believe that a compatibilist?s view of free will is incorrect. Compatibilism defines free will as the freedom to act, whereas incompatibilists believe that free will is more than that and to say it is just the freedom to act is not sufficient. This suggests that both determinism and free will cannot be reconciled, which is more likely, as they are two very different, if not opposing ideas. However, Compatibilism is a good attempt to combine these two philosophical ideas. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Plato and Nietzsche on Authority

    From this comes a tyrant, who 'is not afraid of murder' and 'stirs up war'. Another point he makes is that 'it is simply never right to harm anyone at any time' - which obviously is a specific way of showing his feelings on violence and this would apply to taking a country or state by force.

  2. Is free will compatible with determinism?

    The possibility of freedom from the 'shackles' of determinism is also troubling, as it would seem to be impossible, even the having the

  1. 'God is omniscient so therefore we cannot have free will(TM) Discuss.

    Skinner used positive and negative reinforcement on animals to encourage the specific behaviour he wanted decrease the behaviour he did not want. Teaching in classrooms today rests on this principle with children given praise, when they do something well and withdrawal of privileges .for undesirable behaviour.

  2. Sartre is a very strong proponent of strong determinism, that is, he does not ...

    According to scientific explanation, almost any behavior becomes seemingly explainable. Those processes that are not scientifically explained (such as quantum mechanics) are currently being "researched" in order to discover the "laws" behind them. This belief is quite hard to argue against, particularly when talking about a purely physical world.

  1. Philosophy - Conscience (90/90)

    Noted examples of this are Aquinas' 'Hierarchy of Being', Plato's 'Allegory of the Chariot', Freud's idea of the id, ego and superego, and others; all leading to one literally presented conclusion - conscience is 'boss', and ergo, should be 'followed'.

  2. Conscience is innate. Discuss

    They are also less dependent on the authority of the people around them and are able to distinguish between right and wrong for themselves. This is clearly a developmental approach to conscience, not a religious one which claims that it is innate.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work