• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the characteristics of the scientific method which makes it superior over other methods as a means of obtaining new and reliable knowledge.

Extracts from this document...


BA (Hons) Business Studies with Specialisms Quantitative Analysis / Research Methods Discuss the characteristics of the scientific method which makes it superior over other methods as a means of obtaining new and reliable knowledge Introduction Marketing research has borrowed liberally from other disciplines; this is not surprising because research methodologies and techniques have application over many fields of study. Like other emerging disciplines, marketing research theory has been developed by creative adaptation rather than blind adoption. The extent to which marketing theory has been built on borrowed concepts was noted some years ago by the Marketing Science Institute of America. Historically, most sciences started by borrowing their conceptual approach and general theoretical ideas from other sciences. Joyce1 has observed that: Market research is not a practice or study isolated from other practices or studies. It has drawn freely from certain expert academic fields and will no doubt continue to do so. Further, market research organisations make use of people with expert, specialist training - especially from those fields known broadly as 'the social sciences ' - both as staff members and consultants. It took a long while to determine how is the world better investigated. One way is to talk about it. For example: Aristotle, the Greek philosopher, stated that males and females have different number of teeth, without bothering to check; he then provided long arguments as to why this is the way things ought to be. This method is unreliable: to determine whether a statement is correct it requires evidence. ...read more.


When exploring a new set or phenomena scientists do use existing theories, however, it is always kept in mind that the old theories might fail to explain the new experiments and observations. In this case new hypotheses are devised and tested until a new theory emerges. A theory is accepted not based on the prestige or convincing powers of the proponent, but on the results obtained through observations and experiments which anyone can reproduce. Most experiments and observations are repeated many times. If the original claims are not verified the process returns to the origin of such discrepancies. Epistemology is the branch of philosophy that studies knowledge. It attempts to answer the basic question: what distinguishes true (adequate) knowledge from false (inadequate) knowledge? Practically, this question translates into issues if scientific methodology: how can one develop theories or models that are better than competing theories? It is possible to construct a useful and reliable model for understanding scientific reasoning, known as the "Hypothetico-Deductive" model. The heart of the "Hypothetico-Deductive" model is deductive reasoning (induction plays a role primarily in generating laws about observations that are then deduced from theory, such as the law of multiple proportions). According to the H-D model, hypotheses and theories are sets of general principles that are said to explain and predict observable results. A theory is successful insofar as observable consequences can be deduced from those general principles and statements. When a positive instance of a predicted observation occurs, it is said to confirm that theory. Deductive and Inductive Thinking In logic, two broad methods of reasoning are referred to: the deductive and inductive approaches. ...read more.


A priori knowledge is any kind of knowledge that is in no way derived from sense experience, observation or experiment. What might be called the classical empiricist view is associated especially with Locke, the first of the so-called British Empiricists, and his successors Berkeley and Hume. Empiricism has its roots in the idea that all we can know about the world is what the world cares to tell us; we must observe it neutrally and dispassionately, and any attempt on our part to mould or interfere with the process of receiving this information can only lead to distortion and arbitrary imaging. Conclusion The scientific method is intricately associated with science, the process of human inquiry that pervades the modern era on many levels. While the method appears simple and logical in description, there is perhaps no more complex question than that of knowing how we come to know things. In comparison with the non-scientific sources the emphasis here is that the scientific method distinguishes science from other forms of explanation because of its requirements of systematic experimentation. We use specific methods because they are objective, public and can give repeatable results. The question of how science is so successful at improving understanding is hardly every presented as a question at all. No matter what happens, you will learn something. Science is not only about getting 'the answer'. Scientists who study extremely complex problems can spend a lifetime and not find 'the answer'. Even so, their results may eventually play a part in completing the full picture of understanding. Animal and children may learn about whatever they pay attention to, and so do scientists. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess Empiricism. In this essay I intend to seek the values of Empiricism ...

    4 star(s)

    It is the combination of these impressions that Empiricists claim we can form any concept, even one we have not perceived. For example, we are able to imagine mystical creatures such as dragons even though we have never seen one.

  2. Evaluate Descartes Method of Doubt

    I have learned from or through the senses.' This, Descartes states, included the laws of mathematics and geometry, because we learn, initially at least, about these laws through the senses. He proceeds to doubt the reliability of these sense experiences in this passage 'sometimes the senses deceive us, concerning things which are barely perceivable or at a great distance.'

  1. What are the principles of natural law? Every adult has the right to become ...

    (2)The Means-End condition states that the bad effect must not be the means by which the good consequence is achieved. (3)The Right Motive condition states that the motive must be the achieving of the good effect only, with the bad effect being only an unintentional side effect.

  2. Discuss critically the use of symbol as a means of expressing ideas about God

    This is qualifying our language to talk about God. Aquinas' other theory is of attribution this is the claim that God is the creator of the universe, there is however no link between God and the universe other than that he created it.

  1. Plato and Nietzsche on Authority

    Plato, on the other hand, consistently advocates an ascetic lifestyle, especially when he is discussing his people in authority. They do not care for pleasures of this world: those of body or money. We can apply the same thoughts to asceticism as we can to Plato's philosopher without emotion.

  2. Introduction to Philosophy.

    > Death --> brings liberation of the soul from the body. > What is the good life? ---> Knowledge is virtue that leads to good action. This is the main theory of Plato's moral philosophy: 1)an idea of life 2)

  1. Theory of Knowledge

    to the fact that it is just a common sense theory of a matter which is highly beyond it. This being the case, we should surly dismiss the theory altogether, as it is nothing more than a viewpoint of the ignorant masses which needs not to be examined.

  2. Conscience is innate. Discuss

    If you have a mistake in reasoning then your conscience will be flawed and your action will be immoral. Because of this, Aquinas did not see it advisable to follow our conscience at all times as even though we may think that we are carrying out a correct moral action,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work