• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the different ways in which the word "good" is used in meta-ethics.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

a) Discuss the different ways in which the word "good" is used in meta-ethics. Meta-ethics is the branch of moral philosophy which looks at the ways in which people use the language or morals, asking questions about what we mean when we call something 'good' or 'wrong'. Meta-ethics is the term we use to describe the language of morality. Meta-ethical philosophers try to work out what we are doing when we use moral language because if there is no agreement about the meaning of ethical language, then ethical debate is pointless and will never achieve anything. Do we know something to be good, or do we believe that it is good? Are we talking about facts or values when we use the language of morals? ...read more.

Middle

Ethical naturalists believe that it is equally possibly to establish morals facts and non-moral facts by looking at the evidence. G.E Moore had a cognitivist view on ethical language. He believed that it is still possible for us to decide whether a moral statement is true or false, even if we cannot use our powers of observation to give us the answers. He said that moral and ethical language cannot be defined through facts, if you want to find the goodness of moral actions you can find it through intuition or 'instinct'. We use our moral intuition and although we cannot explain how we know when something is good, we do still recognise goodness when we see it, we just know it. ...read more.

Conclusion

Where as if Stevenson were to say 'X is good', he would mean, 'I approve of X and would like you to do so, too', indicating that we use persuasive definitions and are not just expressing out feelings, but also persuading the feelings of others. Prescriptivism, still a non-cognitivist view, but is another approach to emotivism. It was developed by R.M Hare, his view declared that when we make moral statements, we a re not only expressing out feelings but are encouraging others to share our attitudes. We are prescribing out opinions, recommending that our listeners adopt our approach. If Hare were to say, 'X is good' he means that, 'I prescribe X to myself and everybody else'. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. "Examine the different ways in which 'good' is used in meta-ethics."

    Intuitionism holds that we should pick out our moral principles through what we think or feel. There is no definition of good that can always hold true. For example, if someone were to define good as 'pleasing', an Intuitionist would respond by pointing out that not all pleasing things are good.

  2. Virtue ethics is of little use when dealing with practical ethics Discuss.

    not always have a view about what makes an act right or wrong. Therefore I would argue virtue ethics is of little use when dealing with practical ethics. Rosalind Hursthouse believes in Aristotelian framework for her virtue ethics, even though she does not agree with all of Aristotle's conclusions.

  1. Business Ethics

    up to us to judge, however we can learn how important it is to be ethical in the business sector. Sometimes, the black and white areas become blurred by our own selfish desires. It is us humans that are the ones that cause ourselves to be in the grey area, having to make difficult decisions at times.

  2. Religious Ethics are not the best approach to environmental ethics'. Discuss.

    Kant also viewed animals as of no moral concern to humans; the only time it is wrong to hurt an animal is when it could instrumentally harm a human. However, by Kant's reasoning that we can only have concern for animals if the impact is on humanity, he is contradicting

  1. "Religious ethics are not the best approach to environmental issues". Discuss.

    However, it is the inhabitants of these countries that are the worst affected by our un-environmentally friendly life styles. A major aspect of this is natural disasters. According to Stephanie Bunker, spokesperson for the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, "the number of natural disasters is increasing and

  2. Examine Different Ways In Which the Word "Good" is Used In Meta-Ethics

    Ayer, a leading logical positivist would argue that anything non-empirically-provable is meaningless, or non-cognitive. A statement such as "your eyes are pretty" or "rape is wrong" is completely nonsensical, as it cannot be proved. According to him, all that we are doing by making such statements is expressing our personal approval or disapproval; saying "boo" or "hurrah".

  1. Discuss some of the issues raised in Meta-Ethics. How convincing is the view that, ...

    Ethics and ethical language, the study of which 'Meta-Ethics' is part, can be split into three distinct branches: descriptive, normative and meta-ethical. On the one hand, descriptive ethics describes the way we live and the moral choices we happen to make.

  2. Explain what scholars mean when they say that ethical statements are no more than ...

    Similarly, if we think about the statement 'giving money to charity is good', from the angle of a logical positivists, we can say that this too has absolutely no meaning. Both these statements are neither 'a priori' nor 'a posteriori'; they are not mathematically logical or scientifically testable.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work