• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the Relationship between law and morals. Consider how far the law seeks to uphold and promote moral values.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Discuss the Relationship between law and morals. Consider how far the law seeks to uphold and promote moral values. Total marks = 30. The relationship between law and morality is not an easy one. Moral rules and legal rules have some similarities: like all rules, according to Hart, they share a general (though not necessarily universal) habit of obedience within the society to which they apply, and a "critical reflexive attitude" (a sense of "oughtness"). Moral rules and legal rules are certainly not the same: there are some legal rules that are not moral rules and vice versa. In some cases the moral view and the legal view overlap, this will be discussed later. There are several differences between law and morality. Firstly, in general, the law applies to everyone in society whereas morals are more of a personal opinion and can apply to individual groups of people. For example, the practice of Christianity and other denominations holds many moral views and lessons such as 'thou shalt not commit adultery' but this is not a law and does not bind society as a whole. The law is laid down in statute and enforced by the judiciary and police whereas moral rules are difficult to find an absolute and are enforced through social pressure and supported by an appeal to respect them. ...read more.

Middle

The Catholic Church and non-religious people tend to look to the so-called "natural law" as a guide. For example, Catholics look at the natural consequences of sexual intercourse is conception: if this is what is in nature, this is what should be, and anything that interferes with this natural process is contrary to morality. Realists see moral assertions as inherently true or inherently false. There may be uncertainty and argument about their truth but they have an eternal truth or falsity independent of changes in society. Relativists argue that moral truths may change from time to time and from place to place. Three hundred years ago it was morally acceptable for a husband to beat his wife if she misbehaved. In fact, he would have been failing his duty if he did not. Such a thing would be clearly immoral today. Whether we are relativists or realists we must decide what the moral rules are, morality itself may or may not change but the public understanding of morality certainly does. We take it for granted now that all human beings are entitled to the same human rights, but only two hundred years ago the prevailing morality of Western Europe and America was that black people were less than human. ...read more.

Conclusion

Society's attitudes to specific areas of crime demonstrate that we have a collective morality, more diverging than converging to any conclusion. If there is a close alliance between crime and moral sentiment, and if we acknowledge that the association is a healthy one, it seems clear-cut in acts that are a menace to the system we support and the rules we are set to serve. The morality or immorality of acts such as murder, rape and theft did not change over night, but their legal nature did. The test of a crime against immorality is an ongoing one. Many summary offences are crimes but the question of are they immoral is not so straight forward. When adultery is compared to having a faulty break light on a car or the license disk is on the wrong side of a car windscreen the test of morality becomes less helpful. Although it is seen that adultery is the worst act in this case, only the car driver would actually be committing an illegal offence. Therefore, although the law is continuously seeking to uphold and promote moral values it remains a continuous battle to find a balance between the legal applications and moral views in such a diverse pluralist society. Laura Wing Law Homework ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Teenagers today lack moral values and self-discipline. Do you agree?"

    One example is the fact that promiscuity is on the rise. Many youngsters are even engaging in pre-marital sex, against their moral values. One reason for this is that many teenagers lack the self-discipline to resist the temptation, and their raging hormones overpower their ethics.

  2. "Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they ...

    Do human beings not have moral rights, the most fundamental of all being the right to life? Does the cancer patient then not have the right to life that the process of utility cannot infringe on, regardless of how long that life might be?

  1. natural law

    Natural law is a fusion of the secular philosophy of Aristotle (who claimed that everything had a purpose and therefore the fulfilment of these purposes was good, e.g. a good knife cuts well) and the religious tradition of the church by Aquinas.

  2. Critically examine what is meant by natural moral law.

    primary ideal being the three ideals established at the beginning of essay). It promises an immediate benefit, but the act itself is degrading an immoral. Natural law would dictate that torture is irrational and goes against the first ideal to preserve the lives of others.

  1. Natural Law

    Aquinas felt that the more things that moved toward actuality, the better it becomes at fulfilling its purpose. He merged these into Christian theology. All of these ideals can be developed by living life within the cardinal virtues. These are reasons which distinguish between a real good and apparent good.

  2. Essay on Law vs. Justice

    codify all ethical requirements; 2.) An individual or a group may perceive a given law as immoral, not as a guide to ethical behavior In today's world it is all too prevalent to see more and more people hungry to gain success at an ever-increasing rate.

  1. Capital Punishment - analyse the views of Ernest van den Haag and Hugo Adam ...

    approach and perspective to Haag in terms of the death penalty and its application. Haag states that unequal justice is still justice and that equality before the law should be enforced but never at the expense of justice. Bedau offers a different perspective.

  2. Explain some of the religious and moral issues relevant to the development of new ...

    This destroys individualism and Christians refer to it as, ?playing God.? According to the Free Presbyterian Church, ?remember that each time cells are harvested for the treatment of someone who is sick, a new and sacred life is callously ended.? Moving on, reproductive technology can be evaluated according to traditional ethical principles.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work