• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the Relationship between law and morals. Consider how far the law seeks to uphold and promote moral values.

Extracts from this document...


Discuss the Relationship between law and morals. Consider how far the law seeks to uphold and promote moral values. Total marks = 30. The relationship between law and morality is not an easy one. Moral rules and legal rules have some similarities: like all rules, according to Hart, they share a general (though not necessarily universal) habit of obedience within the society to which they apply, and a "critical reflexive attitude" (a sense of "oughtness"). Moral rules and legal rules are certainly not the same: there are some legal rules that are not moral rules and vice versa. In some cases the moral view and the legal view overlap, this will be discussed later. There are several differences between law and morality. Firstly, in general, the law applies to everyone in society whereas morals are more of a personal opinion and can apply to individual groups of people. For example, the practice of Christianity and other denominations holds many moral views and lessons such as 'thou shalt not commit adultery' but this is not a law and does not bind society as a whole. The law is laid down in statute and enforced by the judiciary and police whereas moral rules are difficult to find an absolute and are enforced through social pressure and supported by an appeal to respect them. ...read more.


The Catholic Church and non-religious people tend to look to the so-called "natural law" as a guide. For example, Catholics look at the natural consequences of sexual intercourse is conception: if this is what is in nature, this is what should be, and anything that interferes with this natural process is contrary to morality. Realists see moral assertions as inherently true or inherently false. There may be uncertainty and argument about their truth but they have an eternal truth or falsity independent of changes in society. Relativists argue that moral truths may change from time to time and from place to place. Three hundred years ago it was morally acceptable for a husband to beat his wife if she misbehaved. In fact, he would have been failing his duty if he did not. Such a thing would be clearly immoral today. Whether we are relativists or realists we must decide what the moral rules are, morality itself may or may not change but the public understanding of morality certainly does. We take it for granted now that all human beings are entitled to the same human rights, but only two hundred years ago the prevailing morality of Western Europe and America was that black people were less than human. ...read more.


Society's attitudes to specific areas of crime demonstrate that we have a collective morality, more diverging than converging to any conclusion. If there is a close alliance between crime and moral sentiment, and if we acknowledge that the association is a healthy one, it seems clear-cut in acts that are a menace to the system we support and the rules we are set to serve. The morality or immorality of acts such as murder, rape and theft did not change over night, but their legal nature did. The test of a crime against immorality is an ongoing one. Many summary offences are crimes but the question of are they immoral is not so straight forward. When adultery is compared to having a faulty break light on a car or the license disk is on the wrong side of a car windscreen the test of morality becomes less helpful. Although it is seen that adultery is the worst act in this case, only the car driver would actually be committing an illegal offence. Therefore, although the law is continuously seeking to uphold and promote moral values it remains a continuous battle to find a balance between the legal applications and moral views in such a diverse pluralist society. Laura Wing Law Homework ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Capital Punishment

    'image' and by insulting or harming a human being they are in result harming or insulting God. Christians believe that humans do not specifically have the 'image' of God in their visual appearance, but rather that we have the God image in our nature, which makes us special.

  2. Natural Moral Law

    Aquinas maintained that it is to live, reproduce, learn, worship God and order society. All things must operate in accordance with these principles to which man is naturally inclined. " Men will fall short of God's best for them because this is a fallen world and man violated the perfect

  1. Natural Law

    Real and apparent goods have to be distinguished from one-an-other; an apparent good meaning to think something is good when it is ultimately bad (a man masturbating for example is against God as it is morally wrong, but this has an alternate good meaning when the man has to masturbate

  2. Ethical Issues Involved In The Legislation of Euthanasia?

    Is it right that the quality of a persons life should be assessed by another person? Since, the view of the assessor will be based on their own experience and knowledge. A relativist would argue that there was no absolute moral position that would resolve this dilemma.

  1. RE euthanasia for and against

    Bentham clearly expresses this when he states, "The principle of utility is meant to... augment or diminish the happiness of the party in question"12. This is the greatest good for the greatest number and it can be argued that perhaps terminating someone's life might be the greatest good as their loved ones no longer have to see the patient suffer.

  2. Religious Studies - Ethics: Natural Moral Law

    Vardy and Grosch have also challenged Aquinas' final cause of reproduction in 'The Puzzle of Ethics' with this argument, stating the possibility that the function of genitalia is pleasure and not reproduction. Aquinas suggests that human reason is a shared tool for moral understanding since we all have this, all humans can be moral and can understand morality.

  1. Teenagers today lack moral values and self-discipline. Do you agree?"

    The masses of the youths today have little regard for moral values. As society is under the more 'open-minded' western influence, many teens are just blindly following trends, placing peer pressure and the desire to fit in over their own moral values.

  2. Natural Moral Law - in theory and in practice.

    We use as a moral code and are intrinsically inclined towards. This can be understood through the natural world and studying the Bible and because humans have been given both reason and freedom they can choose absolute morality and good.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work