• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the suggestion that it is pointless to analyse religious experience

Extracts from this document...


Discuss the suggestion that it is pointless to analyse religious experience Religious experience, by its very nature, is a realm of religion that cannot be empirically scrutinised to the extent that a scientific consensus can be found. The question however still arises as to whether there is sufficient cause or worth to analyse religious experience, or whether, at best it is merely a superstitious delusion by the individual, or at worst a method propagated by the religious institutions intentionally to compound its unaccountability. Many thinkers have posited over religious experience, and although many have spoken at length on the subject, there are those that view the analysis of the actual religious experience as meaningless. However this is by no means split between secular and religious thinkers, although they do evidently have a different approach to the experience. First, it is important to define (roughly due to the imprecise nature of the topic) what religious experience shall mean. It is an unexplainable subjective experience of contact with what the individual believes to be a transcendent or supernatural being. In this case, one may be able to say with a fair degree of reliability that a majority of religious believers hold the view that religious experience is genuinely an encounter with God or the holy spirit. Although the average religious believer (especially with regards to Christianity) may have something in common with existentialism when analysing what their experience meant to them, they certainly analyse it to the point that they appear to 'self-rationalise' the experience and those who believe genuinely believe that they have encountered God. ...read more.


In this respect James' position on the worth of analysing religious experience is mixed, as he believes not in the worth of the cause or root of the experience (suggesting that he may see it as a worthless endeavour) yet devised a way of categorising religious experience so as to make them more analysable. Ultimately James advocated that the study of religious experience may be beneficial insofar as giving greater strength to the effects it may have on people on a real and tangible level; but he did not suggest that through analysis of religious experience one could derive an argument for the existence of God. James himself believed that there was a substantial difference between institutionalised religion and personal religion. To James the thought of a personal loving God who at the same time was all powerful and creator of the universe is conflictual. However before moving onto existentialism, which along with modern anti-theism is perhaps the greatest proponent of the meaningless nature of religious experience analysis, there is also a strong secular argument for the worth of analysing experience. Freud, Marx and Jung all commented on the existence of 'religious experiences' or religious illusions as Marx referred to them. They all approached them with a secular view, yet still found their analysis incredible useful. They believed that religious experience is a product of the psyche and the incredibly complex and still unknown effects of the unconscious. ...read more.


Richard Dawkins, who is vehemently opposed to religion and religious experience on the grounds of their being very little evidence for the existence of God in the first place. He states that even if a person did encounter a 'religious experience' there is nothing to suggest that it is religious based rather than any other phenomenon of biology or the unknown. However Dawkins allowed Dr. Persinger to stimulate his temporal lobe to see if he could stimulate the feeling of a religious experience; and Dawkins stated that although he felt shortness of breath, he felt no religious experience. Thus religious experience, although evidently hugely meaningful for a great number of people, is ultimately subjective. To propose scientific empirical analysis of what is essentially a mystical and wholly unfalsifiable phenomenon is to misunderstand the nature of scientific analysis. One should not confuse objectivity and rational logic with the idea of mystical feeling, and as such the nature of religious experience in itself should not be analysed. However, where the existentialists are correct, is that religious experience provides a great deal of meaning and benefits to those who believe in it, and as such their responses and the good and bad that can result is worthy of analysis. Religion, regardless of its validity, exists in the world; its real world effects and impact should always be analysed and scrutinised so that we can judge it just like any other field of humanity. Harry Hurd Harry Hurd ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Religious language is meaningless, Discuss

    If you believe God is omnipotent, omniscience etc, it makes perfect sense to use an analogy. However, without these assumptions it becomes less convincing. Ian Ramsey developed the term analogy using terms: model and qualifier. Model has a straight forward meaning when it is applied to ordinary things which we experience but it is also used to describe God.

  2. Natural law is the most reliable approach when making judgements about sex and relationships. ...

    In a question like this one we must make sure that we have a clear cut idea of what all the words mean to make sure that everyone is really making the best judgements about whether or not natural law is the most reliable approach when making judgements about sex and relationships.

  1. In what ways may suffering create philosophical problems for religious believers? Outline two solutions ...

    completely different as being in the image of God, according to Irenaeus, is to be able to reason, be intelligent as well as knowing morality; but being in God's likeness is basically being exactly like God in all of his ways.

  2. The verification principle offers no real challenge to religious belief. Discuss

    can sum up all this by saying that the criterion of the scientific status of a theory is its falsifiability, or refutability, or testability. Popper gave the example of a comparison of Einstein's theory of gravity with astrology. Popper argued that Einstein's theory of gravity was scientific because it was potentially falsifiable.

  1. God is most clearly revealed to humanity through scripture. Discuss

    was ever produced by the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit" (2 Pet 1:20-21) However Roman Catholics and Protestants differ on their beliefs in authority. Roman Catholics believe God is their authority, while Protestants believe that scripture alone is authority.

  2. Religious Experience - Edexel A2

    The other group, private experiences, are ones that are for a certain individual only. They may include experiences such as seeing the Virgin Mary, or the feeling of a 'presence' that you associate as being religious. Although not always describable, the experiences are nearly always a lot more convincing to those who experience them, than to someone hearing about them.

  1. Evaluate the claim that corporate religious experience is no more than an illusion

    and have caused internal spiritual revolutions, meaning that religious experiences are not merely illusionary. In the case of the Toronto Blessing, some non-Christians have experienced this and as a result changed their mind regarding religion and the existence of God, although this is not always the case.

  2. Philosophers have proved conclusively that religious language is meaningful. Discuss

    Tillich believed that religious language operates as a symbol and therefore it must be meaningful. Tillich maintained that religious language is a symbolic way of pointing towards the ultimate reality, the vision of God which he called ?Being-Itself?. ?Being-Itself? is that upon which everything depends for its being and Tillich

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work