• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the suggestion that it is pointless to analyse religious experience

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Discuss the suggestion that it is pointless to analyse religious experience Religious experience, by its very nature, is a realm of religion that cannot be empirically scrutinised to the extent that a scientific consensus can be found. The question however still arises as to whether there is sufficient cause or worth to analyse religious experience, or whether, at best it is merely a superstitious delusion by the individual, or at worst a method propagated by the religious institutions intentionally to compound its unaccountability. Many thinkers have posited over religious experience, and although many have spoken at length on the subject, there are those that view the analysis of the actual religious experience as meaningless. However this is by no means split between secular and religious thinkers, although they do evidently have a different approach to the experience. First, it is important to define (roughly due to the imprecise nature of the topic) what religious experience shall mean. It is an unexplainable subjective experience of contact with what the individual believes to be a transcendent or supernatural being. In this case, one may be able to say with a fair degree of reliability that a majority of religious believers hold the view that religious experience is genuinely an encounter with God or the holy spirit. Although the average religious believer (especially with regards to Christianity) may have something in common with existentialism when analysing what their experience meant to them, they certainly analyse it to the point that they appear to 'self-rationalise' the experience and those who believe genuinely believe that they have encountered God. ...read more.

Middle

In this respect James' position on the worth of analysing religious experience is mixed, as he believes not in the worth of the cause or root of the experience (suggesting that he may see it as a worthless endeavour) yet devised a way of categorising religious experience so as to make them more analysable. Ultimately James advocated that the study of religious experience may be beneficial insofar as giving greater strength to the effects it may have on people on a real and tangible level; but he did not suggest that through analysis of religious experience one could derive an argument for the existence of God. James himself believed that there was a substantial difference between institutionalised religion and personal religion. To James the thought of a personal loving God who at the same time was all powerful and creator of the universe is conflictual. However before moving onto existentialism, which along with modern anti-theism is perhaps the greatest proponent of the meaningless nature of religious experience analysis, there is also a strong secular argument for the worth of analysing experience. Freud, Marx and Jung all commented on the existence of 'religious experiences' or religious illusions as Marx referred to them. They all approached them with a secular view, yet still found their analysis incredible useful. They believed that religious experience is a product of the psyche and the incredibly complex and still unknown effects of the unconscious. ...read more.

Conclusion

Richard Dawkins, who is vehemently opposed to religion and religious experience on the grounds of their being very little evidence for the existence of God in the first place. He states that even if a person did encounter a 'religious experience' there is nothing to suggest that it is religious based rather than any other phenomenon of biology or the unknown. However Dawkins allowed Dr. Persinger to stimulate his temporal lobe to see if he could stimulate the feeling of a religious experience; and Dawkins stated that although he felt shortness of breath, he felt no religious experience. Thus religious experience, although evidently hugely meaningful for a great number of people, is ultimately subjective. To propose scientific empirical analysis of what is essentially a mystical and wholly unfalsifiable phenomenon is to misunderstand the nature of scientific analysis. One should not confuse objectivity and rational logic with the idea of mystical feeling, and as such the nature of religious experience in itself should not be analysed. However, where the existentialists are correct, is that religious experience provides a great deal of meaning and benefits to those who believe in it, and as such their responses and the good and bad that can result is worthy of analysis. Religion, regardless of its validity, exists in the world; its real world effects and impact should always be analysed and scrutinised so that we can judge it just like any other field of humanity. Harry Hurd Harry Hurd ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Religious language is meaningless, Discuss

    We know what the term creator means and by an analogy we can use this word it to god and describe him. However, under no circumstances should no model be taken literal or univocal about God. Qualifier is the way in which the model is developed.

  2. The verification principle offers no real challenge to religious belief. Discuss

    In other words its truth or falseness could be tested against empirical observations of the universe. Astrology on the other hand was labelled as unscientific. Thus if applied to religious belief falsification raises a question about the nature of the claims that religious people make.

  1. Assess whether religious experience demonstrates the existence of God?

    Brain Davies responds to this by noting that people interpret things in different ways (an argument used by the sceptics), two people may see a red Ferrari one may argue that it is an ugly car where as the other could argue it is a beautiful piece of machinery, they

  2. "Plato does not value experience enough" Discuss

    through sensory experience, and that, we could not, for example, be kept in isolation from birth with no education or experience of things outside our prison, and released on our 18th birthday and instantly be able to recognise a horse through the Form we dimly remember.

  1. Ethical language is meaningless. Discuss.

    For this reason, intuitionism cannot be used to argue that ethical language is meaningful. The second approach to the meaningfulness of ethical language is the non-cognitivist approach. This is the idea that when someone males a moral statement they are not describing the world, but expressing their feelings or telling people what to do.

  2. Philosophers have proved conclusively that religious language is meaningful. Discuss

    So according to logical positivists, as religious propositions can?t be analysed using empirical methods, they are then meaningless. The falsification principle is another response to the verification principle, it maintains a similar approach to it. Many philosophers regard the falsification principle as a more serious challenge to the meaningfulness of religious language, Anthony Flew developed the principle in the 1950s.

  1. Discuss the study of Religious Language

    Aquinas argued therefore that we couldn?t use univocal or equivocal language to talk about god only analogy can be used. He argued that analogy is a compromise and a way to solve the problem caused by univocal and equivocal language as it enables people to speak meaningfully about the transient God.

  2. Evaluate the claim that corporate religious experience is no more than an illusion

    way we interpret religious experiences; the noetic quality and transient nature of religious experiences hint to a reality beyond this world); pluralism (although religious experiences in different religious are very varied, they all experience the ultimate reality and are interpreted as evidence of God?s existence)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work