• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the varieties of religious experience

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Discuss the varieties of Religious Experience (35) William James in ?The Varieties of Religious Experience? defines religion as ?the feelings, acts, and experiences of men in their solitude, so far as they apprehend themselves to stand in relation to whatever they may consider the divine? Ninian Smart defines religious experience as ?a mystery which is awe-inspiring and fascinating and points towards the Transcendent? * Here James suggests that religious experiences were solitary events in which the person experiences the divine. * Subjective Can be criticised as cannot be empirically analysed. Can?t be falsified scientifically. * James argues that religious experience stands at the heart of religion. Superior to the teachings and practices which he regards are secondary. * It is the actual experiences themselves that can be regarded as true religion. In Religious Experience Today David Hay published research from the Religious Experience Research Unit which included figures that show that about a third of British people and approximately a third of the American population have felt close to a powerful spiritual force, or have had what they consider a religious experience. Descriptions of these experiences include: short time frame, unlike anything ever experienced, and they?re thought to have given awareness that there is a greater reality from what we experience in our physical world. * Though there may be individual differences between these experiences there does seem to be recurring themes and accounts, and considering how prevalent religious experiences seem to be (according to surveys). ...read more.

Middle

His findings are rooted in three beliefs, firstly as an empiricist; empiricism (believes that empirical evidence is needed to deem something valid). However James is criticised on this point, and argue that he interpreted the effects of the experience, and thus there is no empirical evidence. James Responds ? we all interpret knowledge in order to gain empirical evidence. And furthermore argues the effects of these experiences are empirical evidence that the person did come into contact with the divine. Another belief is pluralism ? he argues that although people from different cultures may see different things in their religious experiences, this doesn?t mean that they are making it up. Amongst the psychology community the prevalence provides more evidence for religious experience. It is possible also to draw out similarities. James argues then that these people see the same thing but interpret it differently. Lastly there is pragmatism ? James believes that the truth was not fixed and that the truth is whatever has great value for us. Thus when looking at the effects of R.E we are obliged to conclude that religion holds truth. This is a similar argument to that of R.M Hare who claims we all have bliks (things that we regard are valid and true) whilst others may not see religious experiences as valid, for some who have that blik it is meaningful and so can be regarded as truth. ...read more.

Conclusion

However Rudolf Otto is in support of religious experience, in his Book ?The idea of the Holy?, he suggests that religion sprung from religious experience as James too believes. He describes it as something that is ?wholly other? than the natural world. Thus using this description of religious experience it would seem that the realms of science and psychology cannot be used to validate religious experience as it is so different, therefore many of these criticisms could be discounted. Martin Buber stresses personal relationships with God and that which underlies them. In his book ?I and Thou? he argues for two types of relationship the I-it and the I-thou. The former is where view things as merely phenomena. But by probing deeper we can enter the second relationship both with people and things. This is an interesting point as it could explain why people discount religious experience as nonsense; using Buber explanation it could be said that because they do not have a personal relationship with religion or God they see it as just a normal occurrence, but those who have actually had a religious experience move in the I-thou and therefore can see that it is extraordinary phenomena. Many have used conversion religious experiences as evidence of the validity of the experience; it is argued that such a dramatic chance in such a short space of time is great evidence of the actual reality of the experience. For instance St. Paul on the road to Damascus?. Edwin Starbuck criticises conversion religious experience and suggests it is a normal process that we all undergo. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess Empiricism. In this essay I intend to seek the values of Empiricism ...

    4 star(s)

    If Empiricists were to say that you could form the concept of the missing shade - which seems plausible - it means that it is possible to form a concept which has no corresponding impression. However, this goes against the Empiricist principle that nothing can exist in the mind that hasn't come through the senses.

  2. "Religious Language is meaningless." Discuss.

    They should not be considered as the truth, but they usually have morals attached to them or explanations to express worldly questions. Rudolph Bultmann 1884-1976 famously stated that we should not take stories from the Bible literally as they were relevant to the time two thousand years ago.

  1. Free essay

    Language game

    It is also possible that the language game theory is nothing more than a compromise. The aim of the principle is to avoid the problems in making religious claims which intend to make factual claims, but even though religious language clearly does use non-cognitive forms, many believers would not be prepared to say that all religious language is non-cognitive.

  2. Discuss the suggestion that it is pointless to analyse religious experience

    However, Swinburne's five categories of religious experience are inherently useful to both the theist and secularist, as they are a step towards a rationalisation of the experience. Swinburne's categories: Public - A perfectly normal non-religious object/event (e.g a sunset) Public - Through an unusual public event (e.g walking on water)

  1. "Plato does not value experience enough" Discuss

    said, none more so than in the case of Plato, where it was his experience of the death of Socrates, that drove him to a life of Philosophy and toward the discovery of the Forms. Plato however, would argue that we do not need experience to have knowledge, as we

  2. Evaluate the claim that corporate religious experience is no more than an illusion

    So it is no great thing if his servants disguise themselves to look like servants of righteousness. In the end they will get exactly what their actions deserve.? (Good News Bible) After all, the Toronto Blessing has left some of those affected by it damaged as a result of seizures,

  1. Philosophers have proved conclusively that religious language is meaningful. Discuss

    understand the idea of God?s omnipotence we can have an insight into God?s power because of our human experience of power. In the 20th century Ian Ramsey developed the theory of analogy. Ramsey refers to ?models? and ?qualifiers?. A model is an analogy to help express something about God.

  2. Discuss the issue that it is pointless to analyse religious experience

    Swinburne?s categories: Public experience - a normal, non-religious object/ event (e.g. a sunset) Public experience - through an unusual public event (e.g. walking on water) Private experience - private sensations expressible through normal language (e.g. a dream) Private experience - a non-specific, general feeling of God working in one?s life,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work