• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the view that only a religious ethic can provide an acceptable basis for medical ethics.

Extracts from this document...


3. Discuss the view that only a religious ethic can provide an acceptable basis for medical ethics. Medical ethics concerns many areas of ethical debate. Including such controversial issues such as euthanasia, abortion and human cloning, medical ethics sparks lively debates. The issue of abortion is a very relevant and controversial issue. There are opposition and supporters from both a religious ethical background and a non-religious ethical background. Those who come from a Christian ethical background tend to have a similar argument, that of the sanctity of life. Roman Catholics oppose abortion using the Christian ethical theory of Natural Law. Abortion would be going against natural law as it interferes with God's will. Abortion is right in no circumstances, in other words it is intrinsically evil, as it involves the murder of an innocent life. Protestants do, in principle, oppose abortion on the ground that murder is wrong, as stated in the bible; "Thou shalt not kill" (Exodus) and as abortion is in effect murder, abortion must therefore also be wrong. ...read more.


These arguments also apply in relation to euthanasia. Roman Catholics view murder as wrong and as euthanasia is essentially murder, it must also be wrong. It would also be considered as going against Natural Law as it interferes with God's will, just as abortion does. Protestants would claim that the bible condemns euthanasia as it is murder, yet come more liberal Protestants again claim that all factors should be considered in order to make a decision relative to that person's individual situation. Many people would argue however that without a religious ethic there are no clear rules and boundaries. Deontological ethical theories, that are absolutist theories that apply in all situations, provide these boundaries as the answer will always be the same. Yet not all religious ethical theories are deontological, such as Fletcher's Situation ethics, which is teleological. This means that religious ethics do not always provide a clear cut answer, just as non-religious ethics may not. ...read more.


Although some Christian ethics will provide a stable answer for every situation, an answer that will never change and therefore will have clear-cut boundaries, not every person in the world will ever be of the same religion, and therefore it cannot be universal. Therefore a non-religious ethic which everyone could agree on seems more acceptable, such as one that allows situations to be considered, because therefore a religious ethic could be used in certain circumstances if the people involved would like to do so, as that happens to be their own "situation"; similarly if someone does not want to apply a religious ethical theory then they are not obliged to do so, because again this option would apply to their situation. Therefore situationist ethics that are not based on religion can be made universal, allowing religious ethics to be applied or not according to the wishes of the people involved and this seems to me to be the only acceptable basis for medical ethics, an ethic that will allow for everyone's personal beliefs. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Examine and comment on the view that the principle of the sanctity of life ...

    Simply, Singer considers the fact that the individual has the right to waive his/her own rights if the individual decides to do so. Also, the idea of respect for autonomy provides the thought of respecting the decisions rational agents, or the individual at hand, make including the decision to end his/her own life.

  2. RE euthanasia for and against

    Preference utilitarianism is distinguished, as everyone's experience of satisfaction is unique, as we cannot decide what is good as it differs for different people. We could apply this with statistics to see who would approve of euthanasia, as everybody's opinion would be different.

  1. Ethical Issues Involved In The Legislation of Euthanasia?

    But some people say that being dead is not different from not having been born yet, and nobody makes a fuss about the bad time they had before they were born. In my opinion there is a big difference, even though being dead will be no different as an experience from the experience of not having yet been born.

  2. "Religious ethics are not the best approach to environmental issues". Discuss.

    A utilitarian who follows Shallow Ecology believes that nature has no intrinsic value but instead has only instrumental value in the respect that its existence is necessary in order to bring about human happiness. They would argue that we have no obligation to care for neither plants nor animals unless they serve to promote happiness for human beings.

  1. Business Ethics

    These codes do not usually have legal authority. They are merely guidelines formulated over a long period. They reflect the honest desire of public officials to serve their respective communities with dignity and integrity. According to Hanekom and Thorn hill (1987:163), an ethical code has at least four main objectives:

  2. The Ethical Debate Concerning Cloning.

    He questions whether or not a clone can be a moral agent. By giving a child the same genetic makeup at someone who is already alive, do we take something from his or her identity? Will the child be compared to the person from whom the genes came?

  1. How are religious and ethical principles used in the abortion debate?

    Applied to abortion, this suggests that human life is always of absolute value and that it must always be protected. The foetus is a living human being, therefore it is argued that abortion is immoral in destroying this sacred life.

  2. Examine and comment on the view that religious and/or moral principles provide essential guidelines ...

    Therefore it is essential to explore some of the main religious and moral principles in order to ascertain whether or not they are essential guidelines for medical ethics. If one looks at the Hippocratic Oath in the field of medicine they will find the two key aims are to preserve life and to alleviate or prevent suffering.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work