• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do you think the Ontological argument proves the existence of god?

Extracts from this document...


Before exploring the title of this essay we must understand the ontological argument. According to philosophers such as Anselm, it can be proven that God's existence is necessary; it is, they argue, a tortology such as the statement 'all bachelors are unmarried men' an apriori analytic truth, falsifying such argument means self contradiction. The ontological argument reasons through 3 premises, and accepting that these to be true reach the conclusion that god must exist. The first premise states that: God is that which nothing greater can be conceived. The second premise states: that which nothing greater can be conceived possesses all perfections. The third premise states finally that: existence is perfection. Finally the conclusion reached is that if these premises correspond to reality is: God must exist. The first premise in the ontological argument clearly states that god is that which no greater can be conceived. ...read more.


This last philosopher, Guanilo, was contemporary to Anselm himself and criticised the argument in that it according to the grounds of the ontological argument, it was possible to prove the existence of any perfect being, and he took the example of a perfect island to demonstrate this. He constructed an ontological argument for the existence of a perfect island; by the same token, he argued that in order for the perfect island to be perfect, much like god, it must exist. If it did not exist it would not be perfect. This argument can then be applied to any perfect thing such as the perfect basketball player of the perfect wife. However, in all these arguments, these perfect beings must exist in order to be perfect, but we know that the perfect wife or island do not exist and neither does the perfect basketball player. ...read more.


It is an apriori argument. Although the arguments debate that a God that does not exist, though, cannot be that than which no greater can be conceived, for he could be conceived to exist which would be greater. God, therefore, cannot be non-existent; he must exist. These ontological arguments it can be said, still face the critical problem that in both cases the first premise indicates the existence of a god. It is very difficult for us as humans to understand the world without god, as it is in our nature to want to be happy and to wish for a greater being. However we must be careful in not assuming god's existence before logically reaching this answer. I do not believe that the Ontological argument proves the existence of god, as its starting point is an assumption. The argument does not prove anything in itself and is definitely not enough proof to justify the existence of god. Do you think the Ontological argument proves the existence of god? By : Solange Di rocca ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Examine the major features of the Ontological argument for the existence of God.

    Descartes argument brought with it many criticisms, Gassendi was the first to say that existence was not a property but was something else. He argued that a being without existence would not be imperfect; the being would be nothing as it would not exist.

  2. The Ontological Argument - Critique

    share common concepts of God; it would be wholly viable, should such an idea hold true, that we would share the idea of God as a common truth, presented to us by our souls previous knowledge of the forms; thus the idea of God, that he is that than which

  1. Outline the ontological argument and explain how it proves the existence of God and ...

    Existence is a predicate of, or an intrinsic attribute of God. The argument has similarities to that of Plato as it looks at the issue of perfection. Plato called these perfect abstract versions "forms". Anselm only looks at the perfection of God, rather than that of objects.

  2. Analyze the distinctive features of the Ontological Argument

    He claimed that in one possible world there exists a being with maximal greatness. He then concluded that this being only has maximal greatness if he exists in all possible worlds. Additionally there were modern philosophers who were against the Ontological argument for instance Bertrand Russell.

  1. The Metamorphosis: Existence.

    Gregor's relationship with the magazine cut out, rather than of a real woman, demonstrates his alienation from human beings. Over the table...hung the picture which he recently cut out of a glossy magazine and lodged in a pretty frame. It showed a lady done up in a fur hat and

  2. Assess whether the cosmological argument proves the existence of God.

    thousand years later and be took out of its context, however its weaknesses are evident and overshadow the strengths. Saint Thomas Aquinas was a scholastic philosopher who sought greatly to prove the existence of God; in his Summa Theologica he presents many ways to prove the existence of God.

  1. Outline the Ontological Argument for the existence of God.

    He aims to show this is absurd by means of an argument which shows that the existence of God is logically necessary, and he cannot not exist. René Descartes composed many different Ontological arguments developing them from Anselm’s original argument.

  2. Describe the origins and nature of the Ontological argument for the existence of God. ...

    He must exist both in intellectu and in reality in order to be truly great. It is a logical contradiction to claim that God does not exist, because he has the characteristic of necessary existence. Anselm?s argument was not a new one ? In Psalm 14 we read, ?The fool

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work